Cratter Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 With the new higher sales tax, Grand Forks can spend more money on things like this: Quote It's called the "Downtown Master Plan." City leaders voted Feb. 5 to begin seeking a firm to draw it up, and once it's finished, it will have suggestions for pedestrian and bike flow, downtown "parks and open space." They're apparently ready to spend six figures on a consultant's help. and then probably ignore the master plan when a private developer wants to build a condo instead: Quote Leaders from the city took a 2015 trip to Fort Collins, Colo., to explore ways to make Grand Forks more "vibrant"—drawing inspiration from public art, the city's farmers market and more. The earliest moves the city made in its "vibrancy initiative," which culminated in volunteer committees, community brainstorming and big ideas about the future of local public art and Grand Forks' downtown. One such committee delivered a "vibrancy report" built around several big ideas, like "create bold public spaces," "improve access to and around downtown" and "animate street life." The moral of the story is how do we make downtown more hip: Quote They're touting their support for Gov. Doug Burgum's own vision for hipper, more exciting Main Streets around the state. ....which sees hip downtown areas as magnets for talented young workers and a solution to the state's worker shortage. http://www.grandforksherald.com/news/government-and-politics/4406041-grand-forks-new-plan-key-downtowns-future-has-been-long-time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Grand Forks needs more downtown development to utilize the riverfront. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Kinda hip kinda now kinda cool kinda wow. IALTO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 what are the odd that this "consultant" is directly or indirectly related to someone down at city hall...seems kind of a steep price tag to come up with a plan or idea (especially since its not binding)? couldn't be just as easy as....someone own a downtown lot/space...person either wants to sit on it, develop it, or sell...then that person comes up a with plant to develop it...that person gets the permits and whatnot and that person builds on it...regardless of what someone else is doing three blocks over with their plot of land? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxbow6 Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 I'm getting the hats ready for Cratter's run for mayor......."MGFGA" 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxVolley Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 When the water plant is demolished, there is no reason that a ten story condo doesn’t go up in its place. Put a new library near there, with external balconies overlooking the Greenway. Think much of 3rd street could see development, as shown by the apartments replacing the old Simonsons Lumber Yard. The St Anne’s area / Gateway should see some high rises too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxVolley Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Always thought 3rd St needed at least one block that imitated Bergen, Norway architecture. https://goo.gl/images/Sxs3BP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cratter Posted March 6, 2018 Author Share Posted March 6, 2018 Grand Forks is going to make it harder to drive downtown. Am I missing a something? What problem are they trying to solve? I had no idea there was a walking downtown problem for the few people who do. Well maybe it wasn't much of a problem, but the cool kids are doing it: Quote This is sort of becoming the state and national trend for a reason," City Council member Crystal Schneider said. "I think a lot of the focus now is ... to make downtown, more pedestrian-friendly, more walkable, more vibrant, and adding the bump-outs does exactly those things." Quote The bump-outs narrow intersections so much that many downtown right-turn lanes along DeMers Avenue will be eliminated. Backup traffic downtown by eliminating right hand turn lanes so pedestrian traffic is safer on foot. Oh wait never-mind. It's not about safety, but downtown "Vibrancy." I had no idea it was this easy for the city to pull in $6.5 million is state, federal, and local funds for a more Vibrant Walking Experience. Surely a new 42nd Overpass and South End Bridge will be announced any day now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cratter Posted March 6, 2018 Author Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 2/20/2018 at 3:54 PM, Cratter said: Quote They're touting their support for Gov. Doug Burgum's own vision for hipper, more exciting Main Streets around the state. ....which sees hip downtown areas as magnets for talented young workers and a solution to the state's worker shortage. Thanks for increasing my commute time Doug. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdub27 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 11 minutes ago, Cratter said: Grand Forks is going to make it harder to drive downtown. Am I missing a something? What problem are they trying to solve? I had no idea there was a walking downtown problem for the few people who do. Well maybe it wasn't much of a problem, but the cool kids are doing it: Backup traffic downtown by eliminating right hand turn lanes so pedestrian traffic is safer on foot. Oh wait never-mind. It's not about safety, but downtown "Vibrancy." I had no idea it was this easy for the city to pull in $6.5 million is state, federal, and local funds for a more Vibrant Walking Experience. Surely a new 42nd Overpass and South End Bridge will be announced any day now. I agree somewhat, but the turn lanes are mostly worthless anyway due to street parking. Finding a way to divert large vehicle traffic would be a better way to spend money, though that likely involves a south end bridge and help from Minnesota among other entities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cratter Posted March 6, 2018 Author Share Posted March 6, 2018 21 minutes ago, jdub27 said: I agree somewhat, but the turn lanes are mostly worthless anyway due to street parking. Finding a way to divert large vehicle traffic would be a better way to spend money, though that likely involves a south end bridge and help from Minnesota among other entities. My inner "Moser" would say "Fargo doesn't seem to have any problems building new bridges." Grand Forks has been trying to build a south end bridge for 54 years! Funny how when asked why Grand Forks doesn't have a south end bridge. One of the reason is money. Quote Part of the construction holdup, Haugen said, is funding. A new bridge would cost more than $20 million, and the MPO is juggling not only the needs of existing infrastructure but also a long list of important projects that take precedence -- such as rebuilding the Washington Street underpass. Fast forward a few month, and $7 million (1/3 cost of said bridge) was found for a "problem" no one in Grand Forks knew existed. We should never expect to hear the Metro Planning Organization mention the word "funding" for a bridge ever again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDBIZ Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 I guess I've never really seen the need for a south-end bridge. Wouldn't it just be a bridge to nowhere, as there's nothing developed on the Minnesota side? Would it just be a truck bypass? My first priority would be a 42nd St under/overpass at the railroad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tnt Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 22 minutes ago, jdub27 said: I agree somewhat, but the turn lanes are mostly worthless anyway due to street parking. Finding a way to divert large vehicle traffic would be a better way to spend money, though that likely involves a south end bridge and help from Minnesota among other entities. If there are traffic issues, people won't go downtown. Makes a lot of sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gfhockey Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 This is going to keep people away. Traffic already sucks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cratter Posted March 6, 2018 Author Share Posted March 6, 2018 7 minutes ago, tnt said: If there are traffic issues, people won't go downtown. Makes a lot of sense. That's really the point of it all. "Cool Hip Cities" (aka Liberal Car Hating) don't want vehicles downtown. They want walkers and bicycles. Curb extensions are used to discourage the use of automobiles by reducing the number of available lanes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 42 minutes ago, Cratter said: Grand Forks is going to make it harder to drive downtown. Am I missing a something? What problem are they trying to solve? I had no idea there was a walking downtown problem for the few people who do. Well maybe it wasn't much of a problem, but the cool kids are doing it: Backup traffic downtown by eliminating right hand turn lanes so pedestrian traffic is safer on foot. Oh wait never-mind. It's not about safety, but downtown "Vibrancy." I had no idea it was this easy for the city to pull in $6.5 million is state, federal, and local funds for a more Vibrant Walking Experience. Surely a new 42nd Overpass and South End Bridge will be announced any day now. This is actually a good thing. If you want GF to grow and become a better city it starts with a better downtown. Walkability is the key. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdub27 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 15 minutes ago, Cratter said: My inner "Moser" would say "Fargo doesn't seem to have any problems building new bridges." Grand Forks has been trying to build a south end bridge for 54 years! Funny how when asked why Grand Forks doesn't have a south end bridge. One of the reason is money. Fast forward a few month, and $7 million (1/3 cost of said bridge) was found for a "problem" no one in Grand Forks knew existed. We should never expect to hear the Metro Planning Organization mention the word "funding" for a bridge ever again. Was the toll bridge the last new one that was built? That turned out to be quite a mess. You're not comparing apples to apples on the projects due to what is and isn't eligible for different funding sources. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fetch Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 Make Golf Carts legal every where As long as they are street legal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 I would imagine that this makes it hell of a lot harder, and more expensive, to clear snow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 7 minutes ago, nodak651 said: I would imagine that this makes it hell of a lot harder, and more expensive, to clear snow. Ding-ding-ding! Look at the extensions in downtown Fargo -- whacked by plow blades and needing repair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFlop Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 2 hours ago, geaux_sioux said: This is actually a good thing. If you want GF to grow and become a better city it starts with a better downtown. Walkability is the key. Yes, now all we need is for someone on the council (or the "vibrancy" gang) to create a weather machine that can eliminate the months of late Nov/Dec through mid March so those of us in mainstream society that don't like walking/biking in Sub-Zero temps will actually use the new walk/bike friendly downtown. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisUND1 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 10 minutes ago, TheFlop said: Yes, now all we need is for someone on the council (or the "vibrancy" gang) to create a weather machine that can eliminate the months of late Nov/Dec through mid March so those of us in mainstream society that don't like walking/biking in Sub-Zero temps will actually use the new walk/bike friendly downtown. One word: DOME 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cratter Posted March 6, 2018 Author Share Posted March 6, 2018 "Curb extensions" would make a lot more sense on University Avenue. Wonder why they're not doing them there... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 1 hour ago, TheFlop said: Yes, now all we need is for someone on the council (or the "vibrancy" gang) to create a weather machine that can eliminate the months of late Nov/Dec through mid March so those of us in mainstream society that don't like walking/biking in Sub-Zero temps will actually use the new walk/bike friendly downtown. Works pretty well in Fargo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFlop Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 1 hour ago, geaux_sioux said: Works pretty well in Fargo. Because if Fargo does it Grand Forks needs to do it too. People live in different towns for reasons. Many people choose to live in Grand Forks because it isn't Minneapolis or Fargo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.