Popular Post UNDErmines Posted June 23, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted June 23, 2016 That logo doesn't look at all like an ermine. I would grade it pretty low. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DamStrait Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 2 minutes ago, Blackheart said: SME is on the phone....they want to know if you have any other good ideas. Yes: Start over and select a new name that best meets the selection criteria, and include multiple logo mock-ups for each. If adding "Fighting" to any or all of them helps, then do it. Kick ROK in the 'nads - repeatedly. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 1 minute ago, UNDErmines said: That logo doesn't look at all like an ermine. I would grade it pretty low. And you would know low-grade ... So how would you feel about this as a logo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southpaw Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 24 minutes ago, DamStrait said: At the very, very, very least, the background should always be the geographical outline of North Dakota instead of just a rectangle. The "background" is actually just the jersey color. Clearly I'm bored today: If the concern is that nobody outside of North Dakota would know the ND was an ND and stood for North Dakota, then I think an improperly shaped rectangle would also cause issues. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 26 minutes ago, tho0505 said: Obviously being facetious. You have seen the logo and I assume you're a North Dakota hockey fan. Would you like to see it on our chest? As it was introduced yesterday, no I don't think that will look great on a hockey jersey. However I would deal with it if it was. The hockey jerseys with the Sioux logo were very nice, when that logo went away the jerseys were very nice. I have no reason to believe with all the resources thrown at that program (and rightfully so) the new ones won't be very nice. I even think they will look nothing like the artwork tweeted yesterday that has been reposted 100s of times. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Time Hockey Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 On June 22, 2016 at 0:20 PM, Boogieman said: So far this is my favorite! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fetch Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 1 minute ago, Old Time Hockey said: So far this is my favorite! That D looks like a D 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Time Hockey Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 On June 22, 2016 at 0:20 PM, Boogieman said: I hope you don't have copyright on this! i am having 200 printed today on Under Armour T Shirts. I will however give you one for free! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdub27 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 11 minutes ago, Old Time Hockey said: There are anti hockey folks, just like there are hockey only folks. In my opinion there are more hockey only than there are anti hockey but they both do exist. I bet a lot of those you claim are "anti-hockey" have season tickets at the REA and spend a lot more money watching hockey than the "hockey-only" crowd spends at the Alerus or Betty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND-1 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 http://www.grandforksherald.com/opinion/featured-columnists/4060835-mike-mcfeely-usual-und-nickname-reaction-takes-sad-path This entire column is wrong, uninformed, not true, baseless and shouldn't have been written. Sincerely, Siouxsports.com members 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 22 minutes ago, KSSioux said: I know this thread is specific to the reaction and grading of the logo. I would like to address it in a different way. We see the numerous pages trashing the logo and some say just to move on and suck it up. My question is, if this was the logo associated with "Fighting Hawks", would it have even survived to be in the final five? I know how I graded it, and I used that criteria in doing so. Some of the same people I have seen post on social media how they hate the logo were the same who voted for Hawks because "How About We Keep Sioux". Sticking it to the man. I have yet to ever seen a non cartoonish or really cool tough looking animal mascot so I am not sure what people expected. The only disappointment I have from yesterday is retiring the ND. The rest should have been seen when the Hawks name won the vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxperman8 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1981 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 4 hours ago, jdub27 said: Below is what FH voters wanted. Above is what they got instead. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post InHeavenThereIsNoBeer Posted June 23, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted June 23, 2016 4 minutes ago, UND-1 said: http://www.grandforksherald.com/opinion/featured-columnists/4060835-mike-mcfeely-usual-und-nickname-reaction-takes-sad-path This entire column is wrong, uninformed, not true, baseless and shouldn't have been written. Sincerely, Siouxsports.com members McFeely is a clown and a terrible writer. Also, he has one of those faces you wanna punch every time you see it. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND-1 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 2 minutes ago, Siouxperman8 said: Now that is actually pretty funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Time Hockey Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 6 minutes ago, UND-1 said: http://www.grandforksherald.com/opinion/featured-columnists/4060835-mike-mcfeely-usual-und-nickname-reaction-takes-sad-path This entire column is wrong, uninformed, not true, baseless and shouldn't have been written. Sincerely, Siouxsports.com members McFeelings always takes his shots against us whenever he has the chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND-1 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 Just now, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said: McFeely is a clown and a terrible writer. Also, he has one of those faces you wanna punch every time you see it. I am trying to argue with you about this........yah but he.......well you need to understand that......nope he is a dipsh*t. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdub27 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 2 minutes ago, UND1981 said: Below is what FH voters wanted. Above is what they got instead. A cartoon bird with a headdress is what people were hoping for? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDErmines Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 18 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: And you would know low-grade ... So how would you feel about this as a logo? That wouldn't work at all. However, it does symbolize the logo development process pretty well. Somewhere, someday, a visionary school will adopt the snowy white and vivid black of the ermine, and they will hoist a national championship trophy as a result. Ermines are nature's greatest combination of adorable and fearsome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnboyND7 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 7 minutes ago, Siouxperman8 said: Wonder what Brad said to him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1981 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 4 minutes ago, jdub27 said: A cartoon bird with a headdress is what people were hoping for? Ended up with just a plain cartoon bird. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 2 minutes ago, JohnboyND7 said: Wonder what Brad said to him. I doubt it was "way to stand up for your beliefs. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDvince97-01 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 8 minutes ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said: McFeely is a clown and a terrible writer. Also, he has one of those faces you wanna punch every time you see it. Post of the year. Truth and facts. Especially the last sentence. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 10 minutes ago, homer said: Some of the same people I have seen post on social media how they hate the logo were the same who voted for Hawks because "How About We Keep Sioux". Sticking it to the man. ... The rest should have been seen when the Hawks name won the vote. Yup. Like Ed said, "amateurs". 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodacker Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 1 minute ago, The Sicatoka said: Yup. Like Ed said, "amateurs". The only professional voters out there are democrats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.