MafiaMan Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 One guy saying something didn't cause the universe to curse Zane with a goal-against. Maybe it was LaDue taking a major that led to that goal? It's 2015, not the Middle Ages. BURN THE WITCH AT THE STAKE! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxbow6 Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 During first period a SCSU mother of a player sat next to us.......she laid into the guy in front of us for standing up during play when things were getting exciting in front of the Q goalie/net (we were right behind net). He in no uncertain terms told where to go.......she and her lap dog husband were not around to begin the 2nd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
90siouxfan Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 Someone mentioned that Zane should been awarded a goal when the puck was played with a high stick to prevent an empty net goal, any chance the officials correct it post game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray77 Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 Someone mentioned that Zane should been awarded a goal when the puck was played with a high stick to prevent an empty net goal, any chance the officials correct it post game?  If there's an empty net and a player has a breakaway and is hauled down by a defender, or if the puck is shot and a defending player throws his stick to stop it a goal can be awarded. I don't think that's the case for a high stick. A high stick results in a whistle and faceoff in the zone, just like it does any other time during the game.  But dang, I wish Zane would have scored. If that went in Scheel's Arena would have absolutely blown up. He actually had a 2nd attempt at it and fanned on the shot! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dagies Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 BURN THE WITCH AT THE STAKE! Geez, we're going to run out of posters around here. I'm barely one step ahead of the vigilantes myself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ringneck28 Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 Is it just me or did Hak send a message to #8 last night by having him serve the 2 penalties too many men and 5 min. Major. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDBIZ Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 Is it just me or did Hak send a message to #8 last night by having him serve the 2 penalties too many men and 5 min. Major. I was wondering about that too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dagies Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 I don't think it's a message. I don't think Schwartz is a PK'er anyway, and you have to have someone who was on the ice serve the penalty. So it was logical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodbuster Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 If there's an empty net and a player has a breakaway and is hauled down by a defender, or if the puck is shot and a defending player throws his stick to stop it a goal can be awarded. I don't think that's the case for a high stick. A high stick results in a whistle and faceoff in the zone, just like it does any other time during the game.  But dang, I wish Zane would have scored. If that went in Scheel's Arena would have absolutely blown up. He actually had a 2nd attempt at it and fanned on the shot! That's what I was thinking, too. It would have been fun to hear the crowd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoneySIOUX Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 Is it just me or did Hak send a message to #8 last night by having him serve the 2 penalties too many men and 5 min. Major. He doesn't kill penalties... Simple as that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iluvdebbies Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 I don't think it's a message. I don't think Schwartz is a PK'er anyway, and you have to have someone who was on the ice serve the penalty. So it was logical. Anybody can serve those penalties......I doesn't have to be someone on the ice at the time of the penalty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fetch Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 So how hard was it to stand for 2 games ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ringneck28 Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 Anybody can serve those penalties......I doesn't have to be someone on the ice at the time of the penalty.That is what I thought too. Imo I thought it would have been Murphy. I really think it was a message. Gonna tweet Brad and see his opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stack Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 I'm a little tired hearing about how the Fargo regional is a home game for North Dakota. It is not in their home arena so no it is not a home game. It is a neutral site which the NCAA wanted. To have the arena completely fill with North Dakota fans shows how well they follow the team. Fargo is 75 miles from Grand Forks. In comparison: Manchester is 53 miles from Boston (home game for BU?) Providence is 51 miles from Boston home game for BC against Denver?  Having these teams travel less than an hour away for regionals is one of the main reasons that they make the Frozen Four so often.  Hopefully we can make that same thing happen tonight against Jan Brady State.   Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MafiaMan Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 I'm a little tired hearing about how the Fargo regional is a home game for North Dakota. It is not in their home arena so no it is not a home game. It is a neutral site which the NCAA wanted. To have the arena completely fill with North Dakota fans shows how well they follow the team.I've heard that enough this weekend as well. Some of the same folks refer to the X as a "neutral-ice" site. On the flip-side, I have heard Starman and others criticize the NCAA over Providence College playing Miami today in their own backyard as a #4 seed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iluvdebbies Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 I've heard that enough this weekend as well. Some of the same folks refer to the X as a "neutral-ice" site. On the flip-side, I have heard Starman and others criticize the NCAA over Providence College playing Miami today in their own backyard as a #4 seed. Did you catch it when the announcer referred to us as the Nodaks.....had a nice ring to it, eh? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxScore Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 Is it just me or did Hak send a message to #8 last night by having him serve the 2 penalties too many men and 5 min. Major. No message Nick just isn't a penalty killer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodbuster Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 Did you catch it when the announcer referred to us as the Nodaks.....had a nice ring to it, eh? Not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feff Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 Anyone have a link to highlights from last night? Can't find anything on ESPN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scpa0305 Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 He doesn't kill penalties... Simple as that I think hak was doing it on purpose. His body language was about as bad as any player I've seen in a long time. At one point NS turned to the bench and visibly mouthed "why" when being taken off the ice on the PP. Constantly rolling his eyes. My bro and I were both blown away by how he was acting. No other player was doing anything close. Last night was the closest I've ever sat at a Sioux game....I could see eye lashes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.357 Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 I think hak was doing it on purpose. His body language was about as bad as any player I've seen in a long time. At one point NS turned to the bench and visibly mouthed "why" when being taken off the ice on the PP. Constantly rolling his eyes. My bro and I were both blown away by how he was acting. No other player was doing anything close. Last night was the closest I've ever sat at a Sioux game....I could see eye lashes. It's behavior like that which needs to be nipped in the bud before it spreads to other players. Safe to say that the last thing UND needs at this point in the season is a player who's not giving his all cuz "coach won't play me when I want". Seems the Schmaltz bros have all the physical talent, but need some emotional maturity to make them more complete players. Good observation & something to watch for tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MafiaMan Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 I think hak was doing it on purpose. His body language was about as bad as any player I've seen in a long time. At one point NS turned to the bench and visibly mouthed "why" when being taken off the ice on the PP. Constantly rolling his eyes. My bro and I were both blown away by how he was acting. No other player was doing anything close.Maybe he was just trying to do an impression of Mike Reilly? If so, it wasn't bad! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yelo09 Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 So how hard was it to stand for 2 games ? It wasn't bad we were right on the glass lots of great Sioux fans around us they would respect your spot if you left. A very excellent experience Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InHeavenThereIsNoBeer Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 It wasn't bad we were right on the glass lots of great Sioux fans around us they would respect your spot if you left. A very excellent experience Well yeah, as long as you call no quack backs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.