UND Fan Posted September 25, 2014 Posted September 25, 2014 I am concerned that it could be worse than this. MSU 52 UND 9 Quote
Shawn-O Posted September 25, 2014 Posted September 25, 2014 I'm no Beano Cook, but this one'll be ugly folks. MSU - 44 34 UND - 6 Quote
bincitysioux Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 I predict that North Dakota will have its best offensive showing to date. Quote
Shawn-O Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 I predict that North Dakota will have its best offensive showing to date. As in points on the scoreboard? Quote
The Sicatoka Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 I predict a wet ball. http://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?lon=-111.04962&lat=45.65876#.VCVmw_ldVZg Quote
geaux_sioux Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 I predict a wet ball. http://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?lon=-111.04962&lat=45.65876#.VCVmw_ldVZg Advantage us? You bet your ass. Quote
UNDBIZ Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 MSU - 38 (due in large part to amazing field position to start every drive) UND - 06 Quote
Matt Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 MSU-27 UND-10 Weather will be a factor, but not enough to give the dome team an advantage. Quote
airmail Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 Keeping it within 20 would be nice to see... Quote
gundy1124 Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 More bending, less breaking by our defense. I think our D is relatively healthy. MSU - 30 UND - 13 Quote
The Sicatoka Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 Advantage us? You bet your ass. On field turf, I believe a wet ball harms both teams' run game*, but it gives a minor edge to the wide receivers as they know when they're going to cut and the DBs do not. You tend to slip more when you are reacting than when you plan on cutting. (On natural surface the wet field starts to hurt the WRs equally as the ground starts to give.) *To quote Chris Berman, "Fum-BLE!" Quote
gundy1124 Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 On field turf, I believe a wet ball harms both teams' run game*, but it gives a minor edge to the wide receivers as they know when they're going to cut and the DBs do not. You tend to slip more when you are reacting than when you plan on cutting. (On natural surface the wet field starts to hurt the WRs equally as the ground starts to give.) *To quote Chris Berman, "Fum-BLE!" You are wise- Quote
mksioux Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 Montana State - 41 North Dakota - 10 Quote
geaux_sioux Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 On field turf, I believe a wet ball harms both teams' run game*, but it gives a minor edge to the wide receivers as they know when they're going to cut and the DBs do not. You tend to slip more when you are reacting than when you plan on cutting. (On natural surface the wet field starts to hurt the WRs equally as the ground starts to give.) *To quote Chris Berman, "Fum-BLE!" Aka misdirection plays and pa passes will be deadly. Quote
Hayduke Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 Montana Kitty Cats 44 North Dakota no-names 10 A brutal year...let's get some recruits and turn this thing around... Quote
dmksioux Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 I'm hoping our Offensive coordinator surprises a few people and opens up the play book a bit. That being said... MSU-28 UND-17 Quote
Oxbow6 Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 My revision of my mid week revised early week prediction: 42-17 Cats Quote
Hayduke Posted September 26, 2014 Posted September 26, 2014 My revision of my mid week revised early week prediction: 42-17 Cats I look forward to your game day early morning revision followed up by your pre-game later morning revision. 1 Quote
Hawkster Posted September 27, 2014 Posted September 27, 2014 38-6 Bobcats. Ain't gonna be purdy. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.