bison73 Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 On 2/10/2016 at 9:42 PM, SiouxVolley said: His retiring does not change a thing. It shows that a plan is more than one person agreeing. Expand Please produce document where a majority of administrators agreed to go FBS. Quote
bison73 Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 On 2/13/2016 at 8:18 PM, SiouxVolley said: You and AGS said Coastal could never go FBS. You and AGS are jokes. Expand You also said the same thing to me but you couldnt produce those comments. Quote
SiouxVolley Posted February 14, 2016 Author Posted February 14, 2016 On 2/14/2016 at 2:45 AM, bison73 said: You also said the same thing to me but you couldnt produce those comments. Expand You bizon trolls are all the same to me. What's the difference? Quote
SiouxVolley Posted February 14, 2016 Author Posted February 14, 2016 On 2/14/2016 at 2:44 AM, bison73 said: Please produce document where a majority of administrators agreed to go FBS. Expand An overwhelming majority of bison trolls are not capable of critical thought or reasoning. You will have to wait until the Fargo Forum spells it out to you. Quote
bison73 Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 On 2/14/2016 at 5:44 AM, SiouxVolley said: An overwhelming majority of bison trolls are not capable of critical thought or reasoning. You will have to wait until the Fargo Forum spells it out to you. Expand Couldnt produce the required information so your response isnt surprising. Quote
bison73 Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 On 2/14/2016 at 5:33 AM, SiouxVolley said: You bizon trolls are all the same to me. What's the difference? Expand Manufacturing a lie to fit your narrative shows extremely poor form. Quote
SiouxVolley Posted February 14, 2016 Author Posted February 14, 2016 On 2/14/2016 at 6:19 AM, bison73 said: Manufacturing a lie to fit your narrative shows extremely poor form. Expand And trolling on a opponents message is? The minute the Big Sky even makes a move to FBS, you and Herd have to agree to ban yourselves from trolling on this board. Quote
niouxsiouxfan Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 On 2/4/2016 at 2:44 PM, darell1976 said: LSU 80 Idaho (FBS) 0 LSU 80 Idaho (FCS) 0 This could hurt LSU's SOS either way if they want to make it to that precocious "playoff". Expand On 2/4/2016 at 2:45 PM, JohnboyND7 said: They are in the SEC, making the playoff there is pretty manageable. Expand The Playoff will jump to eight teams as soon as they can, maybe 12-16 by then, Quote
darell1976 Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 On 2/14/2016 at 9:57 PM, niouxsiouxfan said: The Playoff will jump to eight teams as soon as they can, maybe 12-16 by then, Expand If they do 12-16 it should include all conference winners plus a few bubble teams. Makes the regular season more exciting if you are a fan of a team from a G5 conference. Quote
bison73 Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 On 2/14/2016 at 9:38 PM, SiouxVolley said: And trolling on a opponents message is? The minute the Big Sky even makes a move to FBS, you and Herd have to agree to ban yourselves from trolling on this board. Expand I dont troll this board. Ive actually had some very good conversations here. You on the other hand cant say the same. ps I noticed you didnt deny posting a lie. Quote
nd1sufan Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/13/2016 at 7:56 PM, Herd said: You are all alone in thinking that the BSC can go FBS. All over AGS, CAA fans are repeating again and again that if FCS conferences could move FBS, the CAA would have done so long ago, and that MA and ODU would still be in the CAA. The NCAA will squelch any designs that the BSC has to move FBS. Having Idaho in your conference as the reason will draw belly laughter for FBS conferences. Expand #buttidaho... You are forgetting the BSC has the Idaho wildcard in their pocket. They are their magic ticket to the FBS. Never mind that the Big Sky schools can't even afford FCOA much less 22 more scholarships. Quote
dakotadan Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 Honest question... why do FU fans care so much if this discussion is going on here? If you would stay away from this thread it would be nothing more than darrell and SiouxVolley going back and forth. 1 Quote
jdub27 Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/15/2016 at 12:57 AM, nd1sufan said: Never mind that the Big Sky schools can't even afford FCOA much less 22 more scholarships. Expand Link? 1 Quote
homer Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/15/2016 at 2:04 AM, jdub27 said: Link? Expand That is what I was thinking. You forget that FU fans know exactly which schools are offering because they announced it second. All of them knew UNI was offering this year. Quote
UND1983 Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/15/2016 at 12:57 AM, nd1sufan said: #buttidaho... You are forgetting the BSC has the Idaho wildcard in their pocket. They are their magic ticket to the FBS. Never mind that the Big Sky schools can't even afford FCOA much less 22 more scholarships. Expand Why are you worried about it? #buttout Quote
niouxsiouxfan Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/14/2016 at 11:07 PM, darell1976 said: If they do 12-16 it should include all conference winners plus a few bubble teams. Makes the regular season more exciting if you are a fan of a team from a G5 conference. Expand That is the thought for the larger groupings. The argument for eight as you can imagine is, "we have so many really good teams tho" coming from the big and good conferences (SEC, Big Ten, ACC). They want multiple teams represented. I'm sure the Pac 12 isn't far behind. And of course the idiots in the Big 12 (idiots because they don't know how to count to 12, I know Big Ten also has this problem, but they at least they got their minimum) want their conference represented. Add in a G5 program that is having a great year, or Notre Dame (tho I think they will fall into conference), and you are easily at eight, again upsetting the bigger conferences, so then you have to expand to at least twelve. ***There is some tread on what SiouxVolley puts forth about UND and BSC, I'll get into the whole realignment thing another day. But the Playoff Expansion is a part of it Quote
bison73 Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/15/2016 at 1:28 AM, dakotadan said: Honest question... why do FU fans care so much if this discussion is going on here? If you would stay away from this thread it would be nothing more than darrell and SiouxVolley going back and forth. Expand You have a point. Quote
bison73 Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/15/2016 at 4:07 AM, niouxsiouxfan said: That is the thought for the larger groupings. The argument for eight as you can imagine is, "we have so many really good teams tho" coming from the big and good conferences (SEC, Big Ten, ACC). They want multiple teams represented. I'm sure the Pac 12 isn't far behind. And of course the idiots in the Big 12 (idiots because they don't know how to count to 12, I know Big Ten also has this problem, but they at least they got their minimum) want their conference represented. Add in a G5 program that is having a great year, or Notre Dame (tho I think they will fall into conference), and you are easily at eight, again upsetting the bigger conferences, so then you have to expand to at least twelve. ***There is some tread on what SiouxVolley puts forth about UND and BSC, I'll get into the whole realignment thing another day. But the Playoff Expansion is a part of it Expand The P5 isnt going to allow anyone else in their party. Thats one of the reasons they have autonomy. Yes they will increase the playoff field but not the numbers some think to get a G5 in. Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/15/2016 at 12:57 AM, nd1sufan said: #buttidaho... You are forgetting the BSC has the Idaho wildcard in their pocket. They are their magic ticket to the FBS. Never mind that the Big Sky schools can't even afford FCOA much less 22 more scholarships. Expand most can if they wanted...um and msu don't really recruit against und so they don't have to...the ones that can't aren't going fbs (isu, wsu.... Quote
The Sicatoka Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/15/2016 at 5:13 AM, bison73 said: The P5 isnt going to allow anyone else in their party. Expand Undoubtedly. But, they will gladly and surely do whatever to "tier below them" to make their own lives easier. If that's change the FBS rules to make more "G5/tier below" teams to make guarantees cheaper, I could readily see that. Plus, it waters that "tier below" down to make the P5 appear all the better. Quote
niouxsiouxfan Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/15/2016 at 5:13 AM, bison73 said: The P5 isnt going to allow anyone else in their party. Thats one of the reasons they have autonomy. Yes they will increase the playoff field but not the numbers some think to get a G5 in. Expand And I suppose you were one to say the Big Ten would never add more teams. (Just a bit of useless trivia. With the financial issues in Illinois, if Chicago State wanted back in the Big Ten, they would have to be allowed in). The Big Ten will expand again likely to 16, the Big 12 wants to get back to at least twelve. I can't speak for the other conferences but they also have gone thru expansion. Quote
niouxsiouxfan Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/15/2016 at 4:39 PM, The Sicatoka said: Undoubtedly. But, they will gladly and surely do whatever to "tier below them" to make their own lives easier. If that's change the FBS rules to make more "G5/tier below" teams to make guarantees cheaper, I could readily see that. Plus, it waters that "tier below" down to make the P5 appear all the better. Expand You are onto something. It's a money thing. They can keep larger part of the pie amongst themselves. The tier below them still has bowls, but less likely to get into playoffs. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/15/2016 at 7:01 PM, niouxsiouxfan said: With the financial issues in Illinois, if Chicago State wanted back in the Big Ten, they would have to be allowed in Expand You're confusing Chicago State (holding nose from stench) with the University of Chicago (the AAU member and former member of the B1G). Quote
The Sicatoka Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/15/2016 at 7:03 PM, niouxsiouxfan said: You are onto something. It's a money thing. They can keep larger part of the pie amongst themselves. The tier below them still has bowls, but less likely to get into playoffs. Expand It's all about The Benjamins. Quote
niouxsiouxfan Posted February 16, 2016 Posted February 16, 2016 On 2/15/2016 at 7:15 PM, The Sicatoka said: You're confusing Chicago State (holding nose from stench) with the University of Chicago (the AAU member and former member of the B1G). Expand Thank you for the correction, you are correct! But premise still holds Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.