Popular Post UND1983 Posted March 15, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted March 15, 2017 1 hour ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said: The only time many people (including myself) watch women's hockey that doesn't involve a friend or family member is the Olympics. That's a good talking point for them to argue for better pay. 1k a month is pretty paltry. Doubling it won't break the bank. 25k x 12 months is an extra 300k a year. It'll be more expensive if they wind up being represented by something similar to (or by) the NHLPA. Pay them 2K a month for four years to train for a two week event- really? lmfao. The US Olympic/USA Hockey program would go broke if they had to become every athletes main source of income. Plus, who says these players are going to actually make the team after they paid them all that money? Laughable. 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.