Blackheart Posted December 23, 2025 Posted December 23, 2025 Well, this was all kinda depressing... Quote
zonadub Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Native American group vows Supreme Court fight over woke New York mascot ban https://www.foxnews.com/us/native-american-group-vows-supreme-court-fight-woke-new-york-mascot-ban excerpts from the article: The Native American Guardian’s Association (NAGA) argued that the New YorkBoard of Regents’ 2023 rule banning the use of Native names or imagery by public schools is discriminatory and violates the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of equal treatment under the law. "Today, we take the next step in our journey to the United States Supreme Court, which is the only logical finish line," NAGA counsel Chap Petersen said in a statement. "The ‘Native Name Ban’ laws are both offensive and plainly unconstitutional. Their very existence is an embarrassment to all Americans, as well as the Native community." NAGA has stated that its broader goal is to eliminate such bans nationwide, including restoring names like the "Fighting Sioux" in North Dakota. Winning this case should lead to the wholesale voiding of ‘Name Ban’ laws, including the cancellation of the ‘Fighting Sioux’ name and symbol in North Dakota," NAGA President Clayton Anderson, who is enrolled in the Hidatsa Tribe, said in a statement. They’re only targeting one group, one ethnicity, to say you can’t be recognized, you can't be celebrated by the teams," Peterson added. "That’s a violation of the 14th amendment, which prohibits racial discrimination and gives all people equal protection under the law regardless of race or ethnicity." 1 Quote
CMSioux Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago On 12/23/2025 at 3:23 PM, ND_Texan said: I often wonder how many other UND alumni besides myself stopped giving money to the university when they dropped the Fighting Sioux nickname. Any others out there? Thought they have set records over the past decade in fundraising? Quote
CMSioux Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago On 12/23/2025 at 3:28 PM, ND_Texan said: We had a weak woke president that chose not to fight the matter. There most definitely was a choice. Revisionist history Quote
CMSioux Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago On 12/23/2025 at 3:47 PM, ND_Texan said: I got a call from the Alumni Association I believe in 2011, during the heat of the battle, asking why I hadn't provided my usual donation. I told them I will return to giving when they get the Sioux name back or fight the NCAA hard and honorably. Neither occurred and I kept my word. We had the opportunity to convince the Standing Rock tribe to vote on the issue, as their chief (a horrific drunk) at the time wouldn't allow a vote. We would have carried that vote like we did with the Spirit Lake tribe, but zero effort was made to get them to vote. That was the turning point. There was no effort by the university to make it happen then, in subsequent years, or even now. Why do you think that is? A majority of Standing Rock triable members live in South Dakota. They had/have much bigger issues than voting about a logo for a school hundreds of miles away they have no connection with. The mistake was when our AG agreed to UND having to get approval from two tribes - no other school had to do that. Really doubtful it would have passed on Standing Rock. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.