The Sicatoka Posted August 31, 2011 Posted August 31, 2011 DRAKE 96 SIOUX 5 Why not just pick it as eleventy-billion to two.* *charity safety ala UND v. UCD in DII playoffs Quote
Dagger Posted August 31, 2011 Posted August 31, 2011 I look for this game to be very competitive. After watching our team last year with the erratic quarterback play at best, so until they show me something different I will remain cautiously optimistic. I will have a much better idea around 10:00 tomorrow night. Quote
Wilbur Posted August 31, 2011 Posted August 31, 2011 Over under on the amount of times that Jer Garman gets his hands on the ball? I'll say +5.....hopefully. Quote
UNDvince97-01 Posted August 31, 2011 Posted August 31, 2011 I think the FBS win is a bonus not FCS success. Again Darell, show me where I said a signature FBS win makes FCS success? Do you just like to argue? Quote
Hayduke Posted August 31, 2011 Posted August 31, 2011 DRAKE 96 SIOUX 5 Give me the points and I'll take that bet! Quote
UNDColorado Posted August 31, 2011 Posted August 31, 2011 DRAKE 96 SIOUX 5 Lol the biggest tool from SU decides to weigh in. Still a loser! Quote
darell1976 Posted August 31, 2011 Posted August 31, 2011 Again Darell, show me where I said a signature FBS win makes FCS success? Do you just like to argue? But you're right, we need a signature win against a FBS school. No I don't like to argue I am just backing up my thought no harm no foul. Its just the key word that I questioned about your post. Quote
darell1976 Posted August 31, 2011 Posted August 31, 2011 Lol the biggest tool from SU decides to weigh in. Still a loser! In basketball he will predict: NDSU 987 UND 2. Quote
WYOBISONMAN Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 With the personnel changes at UND and what looks like a decent starting QB.......this game probably will be over in the first half. I would guess UND by 20+. Any DIRECTV on this one? Quote
Smoggy Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 With the personnel changes at UND and what looks like a decent starting QB.......this game probably will be over in the first half. I would guess UND by 20+. Any DIRECTV on this one? 623 with sports pack Quote
bincitysioux Posted September 1, 2011 Author Posted September 1, 2011 I actually agree with Darrell1976 on the subject of the significance of wins vs. FBS opponents...................... Of course I'd rather win against Idaho and Fresno, but losing to them doesn't bother me nearly as much as losing to UC Davis or South Dakota.................. The biggest benefit of winning an FBS game is on the recruiting trail.............UND doesn't recruit Idaho much. A good showing against Fresno would be more beneficial in that respect. The second thing is notoriety. Other than Texas Tech, UND hasn't played an FBS team that even a win against would garner an exorbinant amount of media attention. Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Iowa won't play us. Those are the 3 big FBS programs in our region. I'd rather be a 7-4 team against FCS competition than a 4-7 team with a win over a WAC or MAC team........................ Quote
bincitysioux Posted September 1, 2011 Author Posted September 1, 2011 Heard on the coach's show tonight that Mussman is very very high on Jer German................... Also the transition away from the pistol is mostly because he felt a "disconnect" last season with what he has been trying to do with the offense since he became OC in 2001. Lastly, he likes Joey Bradley's approach, skill, and willingness to learn....................said it was a huge benefit to get him here for the spring semester so he could acclimate to the program............ Quote
UNDvince97-01 Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 Ok, last post on this, I promise... In no way, shape or form did I say an FBS win is more important than FCS success. All i said was that we need a signature FBS win. It could not do anything but HELP our cause with recruiting. I never said I thought it was more important than doing well against FCS competition. If you think I said otherwise, go back and re-read my posts. Having said that, can't wait to watch the game tomorrow at the Alerus. Hopefully we have a full house. GO SIOUX! Quote
tnt Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 Ok, last post on this, I promise... In no way, shape or form did I say an FBS win is more important than FCS success. All i said was that we need a signature FBS win. It could not do anything but HELP our cause with recruiting. I never said I thought it was more important than doing well against FCS competition. If you think I said otherwise, go back and re-read my posts. Having said that, can't wait to watch the game tomorrow at the Alerus. Hopefully we have a full house. GO SIOUX! I agree, a signature win gets the fan base excited more than beating teams that they have been playing and beating for years, provided you have a decent season besides. That extra boost of confidence for both the fans and the players should propel you to better things throughout the year. It seems people aren't excited about women's basketball as much as they were in the past, even though they have had good conference and post season runs the last couple of years, because they have been outmatched in many games out of conference. Quote
GeauxSioux Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 UND FOOTBALL: Bradley in the spotlight True freshman running back Jer Garmen will play tonight in the backfield and perhaps on some special teams. I was hoping Garman would be redshirted, but am excited to see him play. I predicted 27-14 over on the attendance thread. I'll stick with it. Quote
UND92,96 Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 Wayne Nelson's prediction: UND 28, Drake 20: Don Quote
homer Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 Looking forward to tonight. I'm bringing my son to his first Sioux football game and it will be the first home opener game I've been able to attend in some time. I'll take UND 27-10. Quote
UNDColorado Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 I will go with UND 31 - 17 I can't wait for the game; going to be a long day at work! Quote
The Sicatoka Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 Let's do a little theorhetical work here first: Assume a 90 man FB roster. Assumably seniors have earned three letters, juniors two, sophomores one, and freshmen and RFR haven't earned one yet. Assuming a balanced roster each class (Sr, Jr, So, Fr, RFr) would be 18 per class. 18 Sr * 3 letters per = 54 18 Jr * 2 letters per = 36 18 So *1 letter per = 18 18 Fr * 0 per = 0 18 RFr * 0 per = 0 Total letters = 108 letter on a hypothetical 90 man roster (1.2 letters per roster spot). That would be an "average" experience team under those assumptions. I counted 92 on the UND roster and only found 58 letters earned (0.63 letters per roster spot). This is still a very young team. Quote
darell1976 Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 Let's do a little theorhetical work here first: Assume a 90 man FB roster. Assumably seniors have earned three letters, juniors two, sophomores one, and freshmen and RFR haven't earned one yet. Assuming a balanced roster each class (Sr, Jr, So, Fr, RFr) would be 18 per class. 18 Sr * 3 letters per = 54 18 Jr * 2 letters per = 36 18 So *1 letter per = 18 18 Fr * 0 per = 0 18 RFr * 0 per = 0 Total letters = 108 letter on a hypothetical 90 man roster (1.2 letters per roster spot). That would be an "average" experience team under those assumptions. I counted 92 on the UND roster and only found 58 letters earned (0.63 letters per roster spot). This is still a very young team. Which means there will be lots of experience when we are playing for more than a conference title. Quote
Wilbur Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 Can't wait for tonights game, although I'll have to be one of those that tunes into the Fighting Sioux Sports Network and gets the action from Pat Sweeney. I used to turn down the game and listen to the radio, but the radio/TV delay is so long now that you wait five seconds to see what you heard happen. I'll stick to my choice....I'll say 52-21. Joey Bradley with a big game for the Sioux. Quote
WYOBISONMAN Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 FYI.....I just signed up for the Directv Sports Pack so I can see the game tonight. Regular price is $12.99/ month. I asked them if they could discount it for me and they are giving me the first 3 months for $7.99. So......if you are signing up for it.....ask for a discount. Quote
UNDColorado Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 FYI.....I just signed up for the Directv Sports Pack so I can see the game tonight. Regular price is $12.99/ month. I asked them if they could discount it for me and they are giving me the first 3 months for $7.99. So......if you are signing up for it.....ask for a discount. Dammit good work, I signed up the other day for the full 12.99. Oh well Quote
UNDColorado Posted September 1, 2011 Posted September 1, 2011 FYI.....I just signed up for the Directv Sports Pack so I can see the game tonight. Regular price is $12.99/ month. I asked them if they could discount it for me and they are giving me the first 3 months for $7.99. So......if you are signing up for it.....ask for a discount. Dammit good work, I signed up the other day for the full 12.99. Oh well Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.