Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

If UND was the Oilers does visions of Wayne Gretzky or Houston come to mind?

It took until 11/20.....but we have a winner! Congratulations on posting the dumbest comment of the year!

  • Upvote 1
Posted

It took until 11/20.....but we have a winner! Congratulations on posting the dumbest comment of the year!

You should be congratulated on posting the dumbest comment of the year. Good job debbies.

Posted

Oh come on! Most of the names stated in this forum and others are already used by other institutions and sports teams.

There is a difference between a team that is a thousand miles away (Oilers) and one that was in a state across the river from GF. 

Posted

Sooooo....you're saying I need to rethink ....North Dakota Fighting North Dakotans

 

Dakota is a tribe. EPIC FAIL. ;):D

 

 

Side note: I laughed really hard at the words on the jerseys on the ice in REA last weekend ... North Dakota and Miami

Posted

There is a difference between a team that is a thousand miles away (Oilers) and one that was in a state across the river from GF. 

What's the difference? Please fill me in. Neither nickname is used anymore. They are both retired and are both free to be used if desired. Heck, any nickname is free to be used if desired. Just because another team, extinct team, or nearby state has a tie to a nickname, but does not use it themselves, means we can't use it? That's ridiculous 

Posted

Dakota is a tribe. EPIC FAIL. ;):D

 

 

Side note: I laughed really hard at the words on the jerseys on the ice in REA last weekend ... North Dakota and Miami

Too bad it wasn't throwback night.....Fighting Sioux vs Redskins

Posted

What's the difference? Please fill me in. Neither nickname is used anymore. They are both retired and are both free to be used if desired. Heck, any nickname is free to be used if desired. Just because another team, extinct team, or nearby state has a tie to a nickname, but does not use it themselves, means we can't use it? That's ridiculous 

 

I think you'll agree some names shouldn't be chosen to avoid (geographic) confusion. For example, Coyotes, Jackbunnies, Bisons ;) , Gophers, Grizzlies, ... et al. 

Posted

What's the difference? Please fill me in. Neither nickname is used anymore. They are both retired and are both free to be used if desired. Heck, any nickname is free to be used if desired. Just because another team, extinct team, or nearby state has a tie to a nickname, but does not use it themselves, means we can't use it? That's ridiculous 

Minnesota and North Stars go together. Why not be the UND Badgers, or UND Buckeyes. At least Oilers isn't a state/Province  nickname of Texas and Alberta.

Posted

You guys are missing the point. All of your examples are of existing team nicknames and mascots in our geographical region, apart from darells Oilers reference, whereas the North Stars is not being used and has not for some time now. All i'm saying is it's an option and a good one compared to many others stated

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...