zonadub Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 Was Belquist open in the back of the end zone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post UND-FB-FAN Posted October 27 Popular Post Share Posted October 27 45 minutes ago, wheelsup said: what is probably the most annoying to me is that we are here nitpicking a couple questionable calls on the offensive side.. where the defense laid another monster egg on the road. If the defense was even mediocre yesterday we win that game by 2+ TD's I completely agree. People shouldn’t even be talking about the 2 point conversion fail, the game was lost on several defensive failures prior to that. The offense and Fruechte’s calls, as well as Romfo’s career best game, were the only reason UND even made it to overtime. GET off their back and focus on the real problem… Bubba Schweigert and his baby, the defense. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 34 minutes ago, zonadub said: Was Belquist open in the back of the end zone? kinda looked like he was to me ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxBoys Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 1 hour ago, UND1983 said: Ummm….Norby blocked No he didn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 13 minutes ago, SiouxBoys said: No he didn't. I thought that was Stay that leaked into flat. My bad 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux94 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 2 hours ago, Siouxperman8 said: From Tom Miller game story in Herald. UND sent in Vaughn, who ran in a goal-line situation last week against Northern Iowa. The Hawks were expecting YSU to focus all efforts on Vaughn, allowing Vaughn to find tight end Jaden Norby sneaking out the play. So the whole play relied on YSU not covering Norby when he ran out in the flat. The defender went with Norby....so play basically blown up at that point. Pinning the hopes of winning the game on the defense not covering a guy. I wondered if they ran that play the previous week to set something up in the future. They did, and if it was 4th half a yard maybe the defense focuses 100 percent on the run. When I saw that formation my guess it was going to be some type of miss direction pass and the defense new it too. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shep Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 Watching the replay. Much anger toward D last night, but OL could not move the pile. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND Football Fan Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 9 minutes ago, shep said: Watching the replay. Much anger toward D last night, but OL could not move the pile. That was my thoughts to, we had no push and the we bullying us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 5 hours ago, Siouxperman8 said: From Tom Miller game story in Herald. UND sent in Vaughn, who ran in a goal-line situation last week against Northern Iowa. The Hawks were expecting YSU to focus all efforts on Vaughn, allowing Vaughn to find tight end Jaden Norby sneaking out the play. I was wrong. Looked run all the way with the OL release. That and the 3rd and 2 would have been nice to execute. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxperfan7 Posted October 28 Share Posted October 28 After a day of reflection, we can all blame the 2 point call, but the D was the reason we lost. They cant run the ball, they barely pass the ball, the only offense they have is their QB. Contain him and they got nothing. "You had one job" and they failed miserably. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post geaux_sioux Posted October 28 Popular Post Share Posted October 28 9 hours ago, Bison06 said: He looks lined up as the left tackle here to me. #62 C, #73 LG Now I’m curious what the play call was. He blocks down and climbs to the second level like he was run blocking. Maybe it was some sort of RPO. My guess is this was a designed run that was supposed hit the left side. Right Guard pulls and the running back blocks left. That makes sense with how the left tackle blocked. I think the QB saw the play blown up and panicked so he just threw it up. This looks like a designed run play to me. Watch Belquist’s route. He doesn’t run it like it’s a pass play until he’s sees it’s been blown up. This is why I was so critical of that shotgun formation against UNI. That got blown up too but their guys hit Q simultaneously and bounced off. Plus Simon was actually playing well and looked in control and they took him off the field so of course they pinned their ears back with no threat of a pass other than to 1 rb and 1 wr. If anything have both Q and Simon in the backfield. Now the defense would have to think more. I just think it was an overall bad concept and I hope they burn that page of the playbook. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinnDak Posted October 28 Share Posted October 28 1 minute ago, geaux_sioux said: Watch Belquist’s route. He doesn’t run it like it’s a pass play until he’s sees it’s been blown up. This is why I was so critical of that shotgun formation against UNI. That got blown up too but their guys hit Q simultaneously and bounced off. Plus Simon was actually playing well and looked in control and they took him off the field so of course they pinned their ears back with no threat of a pass other than to 1 rb and 1 wr. If anything have both Q and Simon in the backfield. Now the defense would have to think more. I just think it was an overall bad concept and I hope they burn that page of the playbook. Plays that rely on blocking the path of the ball are 50/50 at best. Our best runs are continually block left and run right or flip the other way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted October 28 Share Posted October 28 Just a Monday morning reminder: Bo was destroying their DB's the entire game in embarrassing fashion. So naturally on the biggest play of the game UND takes out Simon, who is playing BY FAR his best game, and puts in a tight end who cannot complete a pass to save his life and decides to throw to a fullback in the flat while Bo runs a halfass decoy route on the back side. There is a 95% chance that Bo would've beat his guy in the corner of the end zone on that play. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted October 28 Share Posted October 28 He had him beat across the back of the end zone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted October 28 Share Posted October 28 27 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: He had him beat across the back of the end zone. That was a last resort route. Q never even looked that way until he was going down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted October 28 Share Posted October 28 26 minutes ago, UND1983 said: That was a last resort route. Q never even looked that way until he was going down. Testament to Bo bustin' it every play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted October 28 Share Posted October 28 6 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: Testament to Bo bustin' it every play. He almost caught that tipped pass too. If the OL wasn't in way I wonder if he would've caught it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wheelsup Posted October 28 Share Posted October 28 If that somehow turned into a completed pass I assume our OL would have been flagged for being ineligible downfield anyway. Still not sure what that guy was doing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND Football Fan Posted October 28 Share Posted October 28 1 hour ago, wheelsup said: If that somehow turned into a completed pass I assume our OL would have been flagged for being ineligible downfield anyway. Still not sure what that guy was doing If the OL would have caught it and scored would be 5 yards and repeat down? If so we would have probably kicked the extra point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.