wheelsup Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 15 minutes ago, UND1983 said: An sdsu guy debunked this on Twitter, no linemen are eligible in college football. Who was Q trying to throw to? He was lined up as the TE.. not left tackle. And he clearly went out for a pass. whether he reported or not I have no idea.. he is either the most lost OL player in history or an actual eligible receiver. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 5 minutes ago, wheelsup said: He was lined up as the TE.. not left tackle. And he clearly went out for a pass. whether he reported or not I have no idea.. he is either the most lost OL player in history or an actual eligible receiver. He was the left tackle on end of the line 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opie11 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 Not a rules expert, but this is the wikipedia explanation: College football NCAA rules are less permissive than NFL rules and require that the five interior linemen, numbered 50 through 79, never line up as eligible receivers.[10] If an offensive tackle wishes to line up as a tackle-eligible, he must physically change his jersey number to that of an eligible receiver (this, for example, happened in the 2015 Cotton Bowl, when an offensive lineman for Baylor switched from his usual number of 60 to 80 in order to perform the feat).[11] A defensive lineman can line up as a tight end if his number is not between 50 and 79, as defensive players have no positional numbering restrictions in the NCAA. [citation needed] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 The above explanation begs the questions: who the hell was the intended receiver???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kab Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 I don’t blame Q for the play blame the coaches for putting him in that situation another time he was (n there and they called time out Q was giving someone hell on the sideline for lining up wrong, good for him 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bison06 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 38 minutes ago, wheelsup said: He was lined up as the TE.. not left tackle. And he clearly went out for a pass. whether he reported or not I have no idea.. he is either the most lost OL player in history or an actual eligible receiver. He looks lined up as the left tackle here to me. #62 C, #73 LG Now I’m curious what the play call was. He blocks down and climbs to the second level like he was run blocking. Maybe it was some sort of RPO. My guess is this was a designed run that was supposed hit the left side. Right Guard pulls and the running back blocks left. That makes sense with how the left tackle blocked. I think the QB saw the play blown up and panicked so he just threw it up. This looks like a designed run play to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxperfan7 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 Watch Ziebarth's 3 TD's. He is basically untouched for all 3 of them. A run play like that would have been a far better call for the 2 point conversion. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 3 minutes ago, Siouxperfan7 said: Watch Ziebarth's 3 TD's. He is basically untouched for all 3 of them. A run play like that would have been a far better call for the 2 point conversion. Except it didn’t work on a 3rd and 2 that would have nearly iced the game earlier. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 40 minutes ago, Bison06 said: He looks lined up as the left tackle here to me. #62 C, #73 LG Now I’m curious what the play call was. He blocks down and climbs to the second level like he was run blocking. Maybe it was some sort of RPO. My guess is this was a designed run that was supposed hit the left side. Right Guard pulls and the running back blocks left. That makes sense with how the left tackle blocked. I think the QB saw the play blown up and panicked so he just threw it up. This looks like a designed run play to me. It’s a designed run and if 51 blocks the LB scraping Q walks in. His throw was him panicking and trying to make something out of nothing. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxweet Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 15 hours ago, Kab said: Could foresee a 4 game losing streak here ISU bad team winnable game, both South Dakota schools good but don't look like world beaters plus both games at the Alerus then Illinois State another bad team. 2-2 the rest of the way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 No 6 or 28 or 20 on biggest play of season. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wheelsup Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 1 hour ago, UND1983 said: He was the left tackle on end of the line You guys are correct.. I was watching low res on my phone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 I find it hard to believe that was a run play only based on how Q reacted post snap. Cannot believe that was our play to win the game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 Just now, UND1983 said: I find it hard to believe that was a run play only based on how Q reacted post snap. Cannot believe that was our play to win the game He looked left and saw an unblocked LB and has no where to run. It’s a designed run left with the left tackle running by the LB and the right FB and right guard blocking the same player and leaving the LB untouched in the backfield. You can see where it is supposed to hit and where it would have been if anyone gets a piece of the Youngstown LB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wheelsup Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 what is probably the most annoying to me is that we are here nitpicking a couple questionable calls on the offensive side.. where the defense laid another monster egg on the road. If the defense was even mediocre yesterday we win that game by 2+ TD's 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxperman8 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 Guessing they were trying to build off the pistol set at end of half against NIU where Q rammed it up the middle from 1/2 yard line. Sounds like the wanted the defense to bite on that and then throw pass. I get it but if you think you're better, run a play with your best offensive set and try to get 3 yards rather than fool somebody. Way too cute. The only ones we outsmarted was ourselves. And we needed 3 yards, not 1/2 yard so I wouldn't have bitten on a qb rush up the middle either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wheelsup Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 4 minutes ago, homer said: He looked left and saw an unblocked LB and has no where to run. It’s a designed run left with the left tackle running by the LB and the right FB and right guard blocking the same player and leaving the LB untouched in the backfield. You can see where it is supposed to hit and where it would have been if anyone gets a piece of the Youngstown LB. If this was the actual plan.. then there is even more reason to have romfo in the game. Q is a great short yardage back.. he is not shifty or fast.. he is a power guy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxperman8 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 From Tom Miller game story in Herald. UND sent in Vaughn, who ran in a goal-line situation last week against Northern Iowa. The Hawks were expecting YSU to focus all efforts on Vaughn, allowing Vaughn to find tight end Jaden Norby sneaking out the play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 Ummm….Norby blocked Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxForever Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 I saw the play. Vaughn was scrambling and then had a UND player wide open who dropped a layup pass. Yes, Vaughn was scrambling and it wasn’t probably the best play to start with, but how do you drop that light pass? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 Just now, SiouxForever said: I saw the play. Vaughn was scrambling and then had a UND player wide open who dropped a layup pass. Yes, Vaughn was scrambling and it wasn’t probably the best play to start with, but how do you drop that light pass? Sir, that was our left tackle 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 Q in shotgun nearly failed last week, so again? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zonadub Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 Was Belquist open in the back of the end zone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post UND-FB-FAN Posted October 27 Popular Post Share Posted October 27 45 minutes ago, wheelsup said: what is probably the most annoying to me is that we are here nitpicking a couple questionable calls on the offensive side.. where the defense laid another monster egg on the road. If the defense was even mediocre yesterday we win that game by 2+ TD's I completely agree. People shouldn’t even be talking about the 2 point conversion fail, the game was lost on several defensive failures prior to that. The offense and Fruechte’s calls, as well as Romfo’s career best game, were the only reason UND even made it to overtime. GET off their back and focus on the real problem… Bubba Schweigert and his baby, the defense. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 34 minutes ago, zonadub said: Was Belquist open in the back of the end zone? kinda looked like he was to me ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.