Popular Post Godsmack Posted January 21 Popular Post Posted January 21 46 minutes ago, fightingsioux4life said: Can't complain about 4 points on the road. I agree. I hate to sound like a pessimist but I kinda thought St. Cloud would come out and win tonight’s game in regulation and that’s not a knock on UND but just more of St. Cloud coming out with desperation which from what friends who saw the game told me, they did. UND I heard handled St. Cloud’s pressure very well. I was happy to see that UND battled back each time the Huskies took the lead. I’m proud of the team for what they accomplished and in a tough hostile arena. 5 Quote
Godsmack Posted January 21 Posted January 21 25 minutes ago, Goon said: Looking good. So did St. Cloud drop one spot in the PWR tonight? Quote
Wilbur Posted January 21 Posted January 21 1 hour ago, Oxbow6 said: @Wilbur were you yelling at BB "The keyboard warriors want you to move Perron up to top line"? .....cause he did and they definitely have more jump. Hedquist wouldn't even look at me... Sieve.... Quote
nodak651 Posted January 21 Posted January 21 That was a FUN Series to watch! Love Geno Parish. Love the "student broadcast" talk in the beginning, which was obviously in defense of screwing up NDSU/UND (lol). Thought they were gonna address that specifically for a second. 2 Quote
Goon Posted January 21 Posted January 21 31 minutes ago, Godsmack said: So did St. Cloud drop one spot in the PWR tonight? IRC, they were 13th last night. Quote
TwamleyShuffle Posted January 21 Posted January 21 17 minutes ago, nodak651 said: That was a FUN Series to watch! Love Geno Parish. Love the "student broadcast" talk in the beginning, which was obviously in defense of screwing up NDSU/UND (lol). Thought they were gonna address that specifically for a second. I will give them credit that their commentary was better than the BU commentators. At least Geno complimented UND through out the broadcast Quote
Wilbur Posted January 21 Posted January 21 That was fun. @Wilburs wife lets him out for a quality game. MC's rocking. Packers lose. Sioux take 4....it could be worse. 1 Quote
Blackheart Posted January 21 Posted January 21 1 hour ago, fightingsioux4life said: St. Cloud acting like they swept the weekend. Last time I checked, 4 points is greater than 2. Not necessarily in Stearns County... 2 Quote
stoneySIOUX Posted January 21 Posted January 21 Not a bad weekend at all, considering we got dominated for 120 minutes 1 Quote
Blackheart Posted January 21 Posted January 21 1 hour ago, Green Banner said: Gino also stated how fun it was to watch Jordan Schmaltz on the CBS line Well maybe it was Jordan Schmaltz in Geno's world... Quote
stoneySIOUX Posted January 21 Posted January 21 1 hour ago, fightingsioux4life said: St. Cloud acting like they swept the weekend. Last time I checked, 4 points is greater than 2. All you gotta do is look in the rafters of the Herb to understand why they'd react like that. *cough* participation banners *cough* Quote
Blackheart Posted January 21 Posted January 21 1 minute ago, stoneySIOUX said: All you gotta do is look in the rafters of the Herb to understand why they'd react like that. *cough* participation banners *cough* Maybe the Huskies just needed a hug? Quote
Blackheart Posted January 21 Posted January 21 Sioux were very resilient tonight sending the game to OT...they totally dominated the 3 on 3 sideshow; not sure how they didn't pot one there. I'll take a win and tie against a tough league opponent on the road any time! 2 Quote
SuhakiYeahYeah Posted January 21 Posted January 21 4 minutes ago, stoneySIOUX said: All you gotta do is look in the rafters of the Herb to understand why they'd react like that. *cough* participation banners *cough* To the talking heads on Twitter that say the banners are all we talk about..... You know it's true Quote
Blackheart Posted January 21 Posted January 21 1 minute ago, SuhakiYeahYeah said: To the talking heads on Twitter that say the banners are all we talk about..... You know it's true But those are real banners... Quote
Popular Post Blackheart Posted January 21 Popular Post Posted January 21 NCHC 3 on 3 is a joke...if you're going to settle an OT tie with a shootout (for the extra point) why not just play 5 on 5. It's like you play a great 5 on 5 game for 60 minutes then turn it into a f*cking free throw shooting contest in OT. It's more about puck posession and waiting for the perfect setup/shot. Sorry, just not a fan. 15 Quote
cberkas Posted January 21 Posted January 21 30 minutes ago, Blackheart said: NCHC 3 on 3 is a joke...if you're going to settle an OT tie with a shootout (for the extra point) why not just play 5 on 5. It's like you play a great 5 on 5 game for 60 minutes then turn it into a f*cking free throw shooting contest in OT. It's more about puck posession and waiting for the perfect setup/shot. Sorry, just not a fan. It doesn’t really help in the PWR at all so why have 3x3 Quote
stoneySIOUX Posted January 21 Posted January 21 1 hour ago, SuhakiYeahYeah said: To the talking heads on Twitter that say the banners are all we talk about..... You know it's true It's an easy target lol Quote
siouxweet Posted January 21 Posted January 21 10 hours ago, cberkas said: It doesn’t really help in the PWR at all so why have 3x3 Go 4x4 and have a win count as a full win? Quote
nodakgirl93 Posted January 21 Posted January 21 10 hours ago, Blackheart said: NCHC 3 on 3 is a joke...if you're going to settle an OT tie with a shootout (for the extra point) why not just play 5 on 5. It's like you play a great 5 on 5 game for 60 minutes then turn it into a f*cking free throw shooting contest in OT. It's more about puck posession and waiting for the perfect setup/shot. Sorry, just not a fan. All college hockey has 3 on 3 as it also affects the pairwise. After playing to a tie during regulation you play 5 minutes of gimmick hockey to determine who gets the game for pairwise. I personally dont think it should have as much affect on pairwise as much as it does. It use to be a 55 - 45 split but then they changed it to even more. Quote
Goon Posted January 21 Posted January 21 37 minutes ago, nodakgirl93 said: All college hockey has 3 on 3 as it also affects the pairwise. After playing to a tie during regulation you play 5 minutes of gimmick hockey to determine who gets the game for pairwise. I personally dont think it should have as much affect on pairwise as much as it does. It use to be a 55 - 45 split but then they changed it to even more. Now it's 65-35 if you lose in 3-on-3 OT hockey. Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted January 21 Posted January 21 1 hour ago, siouxweet said: Go 4x4 and have a win count as a full win? This is what I have been advocating for. 4x4 for 10 minutes. If the game ends tied, then so be it. Go back to 2 points for a win, 1 point for a tie and zero points for a loss. And, above all else..... NO MORE SHOOTOUTS. 4 Quote
SuhakiYeahYeah Posted January 21 Posted January 21 I missed being able to watch most of the game and I noticed the clowns didn't get a single penalty. Did they get away with stuff or did they genuinely play clean? Quote
90siouxfan Posted January 21 Posted January 21 imho, ncaa is using 3v3 followed by a shootout to mimic the NHL, so they can counter major junior claims that thier league better prepares players for the show... what the nhl does filters down... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.