Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

2020 Dumpster Fire (Enter at your own risk)


jk

Recommended Posts

When all else fails, go to the British press:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8849687/Hunter-Biden-emails-identify-Joe-Biden-deal-Chinese-energy-firm-report-says.html 

Quote

According to the alleged emails published by the Post about huis Chinese dealings, Hunter also struck a deal for $30 million plus bonuses 'based on introductions alone' ...

Introductions? To ... whom ... or what?
Seems what Hunter knows to introduce folks to are "the big guy", and hookers, and blow. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

Well, it was what McConnell said in 2016.  Lindsey Graham went as far as to say hold him accountable in 2020 if the same thing happens.  It did.  And, the Democrats are.  

I think in this situation it is easy to say the GOP has been proven to be the bigger hypocrites. 

Both sides completely flipped their positions, to say McConnell is a bigger hypocrite simply shows your bias. They both did literally the exact same thing, complete 180 on their positions from four years ago.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MrEdway said:

Sorry Soyboy. Multiple email recipients have confirmed that the emails are real.  And that Hunter is a pedophile.  The Biden Crime Syndicate (and every other republican and democrat that has sold out the great USA) is going down.

fixed

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hayduke1 said:

I happen to agree.

I believe the threat has an outside chance of getting enough Republican senators to vote no on this nominee.  Only two more are needed.  Sasse and Romney?   The claim would be that it is too close to an election, ala 2016. 

A chance, but a slight one. 

Sorry Soyboy,.https://www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2020/10/15/mitt-romney-says-he-will/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Toast Biden or Biden is Toast.

 

"Yet Hunter Biden’s addiction, and the fact that tens of thousands of other Americans suffer similar demons, does not atone for the sins of the father. And that is what the email and text scandal concerns: Evidence that Joe Biden, while vice president of the United States, knowingly allowed his son to profit by selling access to Biden and others in the Obama administration, including to Communist Party of China leaders, and then lied about it."

https://thefederalist.com/2020/10/19/the-biden-corruption-scandal-isnt-about-hunter-its-about-joe/

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Bison06 said:

Both sides completely flipped their positions, to say McConnell is a bigger hypocrite simply shows your bias. They both did literally the exact same thing, complete 180 on their positions from four years ago.

First of all, weeks is different than a year. The Dems were showing how the R flipped, that's what made their point. Take off the blinders.
If McConnell wouldn't of blocked Obama's appointee, different ball game.
BUT, only McConnell packed the court.     member -  "because we can"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Nodak78 said:

Toast Biden or Biden is Toast.

 

"Yet Hunter Biden’s addiction, and the fact that tens of thousands of other Americans suffer similar demons, does not atone for the sins of the father. And that is what the email and text scandal concerns: Evidence that Joe Biden, while vice president of the United States, knowingly allowed his son to profit by selling access to Biden and others in the Obama administration, including to Communist Party of China leaders, and then lied about it."

https://thefederalist.com/2020/10/19/the-biden-corruption-scandal-isnt-about-hunter-its-about-joe/

 

Keep spreading lies, Trumptard. It just makes you cultists and Dear Leader look pathetic and desperate.  That'll help flip the Senate too.

LMDAO.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

CNET

US charges Russian hackers over 3 of world's biggest cyberattacks
Alfred Ng  25 mins ago

Six Russian military hackers have been indicted over a series of seismic cyberattacks since 2015, the Department of Justice announced Monday. The hacks include the most destructive cyberattack in history, attacks that caused blackouts in Ukraine and an intrusion on the 2018 Winter Olympics. 
The cyberattacks listed in Monday's indictment are among some of the most significant hacks ever, and all trace back to Russian operatives, the Justice Department said. US intelligence officials have long warned about Russia's hacking capabilities, which have cost companies billions of dollars and influenced politics across multiple nations.
The six Russian hackers belonged to the same military unit behind the cyberattacks on the 2016 US presidential election, prosecutors said. They worked with tech giants including Google, Facebook and Twitter for the investigation, and expects to continue its work with private companies for future investigations, Justice Department officials said. 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/us-charges-russian-hackers-over-3-of-world-s-biggest-cyberattacks/ar-BB1abjaL?ocid=msedgdhp

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bison06 said:

Both sides completely flipped their positions, to say McConnell is a bigger hypocrite simply shows your bias. They both did literally the exact same thing, complete 180 on their positions from four years ago.

In January 2017 I said it was like they slid the scripts back and forth across the table, changed the names to the other side, and a few adjectives:

  • "Orange was the new Black"
  • He's going to take our guns abortion rights!
  • He's going to find a way to not leave office! 
  • He's not really a Christian!  
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, MrEdway said:

Sorry Soyboy. Multiple email recipients have confirmed that the emails are real.  And that Hunter is a pedophile.  The Biden Crime Syndicate is going down.

The bolded is a bit much for me. 

I'd have to see it to believe it. ... No. ... On second thought, I'll let someone else look and verify if such abomination is true. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, BarnWinterSportsEngelstad said:

First of all, weeks is different than a year. The Dems were showing how the R flipped, that's what made their point. Take off the blinders.
If McConnell wouldn't of blocked Obama's appointee, different ball game.
BUT, only McConnell packed the court.     member -  "because we can"

You can say whatever you’d like to make it seem different, but it’s not. In 2016, Dems were for an election year appointment and confirmation. In 2020, they are against it. In 2016, Republicans were against it and now are for it. Each party equally flip flopped when it was to their benefit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per the Constitution the President nominates; the Senate confirms (advice and consent). 

In 2016: President was D (and a lame duck for that matter); Senate was R controlled. The Senate wasn't going to confirm a D selection on the off chance they could run out the clock and have, well, R + R scenario. Mitch just gave the Senate a way out that didn't involve going on record voting against the D nominee. 

In 2020: President is R; Senate is R controlled (until the election is over and winners are sworn in). Trump could've nominated a ham sandwich with a broiled on "R" and elephant logo and it would be confirmed. 

Elections have consequences. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

The bolded is a bit much for me. 

I'd have to see it to believe it. ... No. ... On second thought, I'll let someone else look and verify if such abomination is true. 

Yeah heres the thing, if this thing where false it would, and frankly should be the end of the Trump campaign.

Ita almost gone too far for that to be at all a possibility.

So if this thing hits full and it is what they are saying it is.

It will all be out and exposed and open very quickly here... and if so gunna send a lot of people scurrying for diatant shores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

19 minutes ago, Bison06 said:

You can say whatever you’d like to make it seem different, but it’s not. In 2016, Dems were for an election year appointment and confirmation. In 2020, they are against it. In 2016, Republicans were against it and now are for it. Each party equally flip flopped when it was to their benefit.

 

8 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

Per the Constitution the President nominates; the Senate confirms (advice and consent). 

In 2016: President was D (and a lame duck for that matter); Senate was R controlled. The Senate wasn't going to confirm a D selection on the off chance they could run out the clock and have, well, R + R scenario. Mitch just gave the Senate a way out that didn't involve going on record voting against the D nominee. 

In 2020: President is R; Senate is R controlled (until the election is over and winners are sworn in). Trump could've nominated a ham sandwich with a broiled on "R" and elephant logo and it would be confirmed. 

Elections have consequences. 

Then don't cry when the shoe is on the other foot, the McConnell new norm.
"Because We Can"
Who controlls the Senate will be very big for the next few decades.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frozen4sioux said:

Yeah heres the thing, if this thing where false it would, and frankly should be the end of the Trump campaign.

Ita almost gone too far for that to be at all a possibility.

So if this thing hits full and it is what they are saying it is.

It will all be out and exposed and open very quickly here... and if so gunna send a lot of people scurrying for diatant shores.

I agree.  I'm trying to figure out how Biden misses the next debate.  Maybe he will have a false positive to be exempt from the debate.  Biden can't afford to be asked about all the allegations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frozen4sioux said:

Yeah heres the thing, if this thing where false it would, and frankly should be the end of the Trump campaign.

Ita almost gone too far for that to be at all a possibility.

So if this thing hits full and it is what they are saying it is.

It will all be out and exposed and open very quickly here... and if so gunna send a lot of people scurrying for diatant shores.

 

change1.jpg

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Frozen4sioux said:

Yeah heres the thing, if this thing where false it would, and frankly should be the end of the Trump campaign.

Ita almost gone too far for that to be at all a possibility.

So if this thing hits full and it is what they are saying it is.

It will all be out and exposed and open very quickly here... and if so gunna send a lot of people scurrying for diatant shores.

tom hanks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...