Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

2020 Dumpster Fire (Enter at your own risk)

jk

By jk
in Community

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 23.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Hayduke1

    1804

  • Oxbow6

    1786

  • BarnWinterSportsEngelstad

    1135

  • The Sicatoka

    1072

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Yote 53
Yote 53

The only people who need to be tested are health care workers, the elderly, and those with underlying health conditions.  If you are young (under 50) and healthy and are taking up a test kit, crowding

Oxbow6
Oxbow6

This country is being bright to its knees by fear....not the virus. Recovery from getting the virus is a couple weeks. Recovery of society from this hysteria will be years.

Siouxphan27
Siouxphan27

It’s sad that about half the country still believes outlets like msnbc and cnn.  You would think after they lied everyday for 3 years about Russian collusion, people would get the hint of what their t

Posted Images

The Sicatoka Grand Master

The Sicatoka

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, UNDlaw80 said:

Well, that's the million dollar question we've been dealing with for ages.  How to solve it?  Perhaps solve the disease instead of throwing trillions at the symptom.        

Yeah, that "peace in the Middle East" thing is a testy, persistent problem. 

Oh, wait, ... you were talking "the war on drugs". 

Nevermind. 

 

Endless wars. 

The Sicatoka Grand Master

The Sicatoka

Posted
Posted

Crabby guy here. 

Life is negotiation, give and take. 

I'll give legalized weed ... if ... and there's always one of those ... if you give me my ask:

 

Driving under influence, proven by blood test, and you kill someone gets you the death penalty. Period. 

And that's weed ... or booze. 

 

I'll give you the play toy, but I want the friction to make sure misuse is not worth the risk. 

 

Signed,
A guy who's been broadsided by drunk going 50 mph in town. 

  • Upvote 2
1972 Mentor

1972

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

So.

There was evidence that Schiff knew existed but it's his fault that the Senate was the one who withheld the evidence that he couldn't present to prove collusion existed so then Schiff was at fault and that's the way it is now that the Senate report proved collusion.

Yeah.  Uh huh.  

 

supposedly knew existed....he kept saying it, and when asked to present it...crickets

Hayduke1 Enthusiast

Hayduke1

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, 1972 said:

supposedly knew existed....he kept saying it, and when asked to present it...crickets

Now that it is proven, what do we hear from the cult?

 

Crickets. 

  • Upvote 1
JohnboyND7 Rising Star

JohnboyND7

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

So.

There was evidence that Schiff knew existed but it's his fault that the Senate was the one who withheld the evidence that he couldn't present to prove collusion existed so then Schiff was at fault and that's the way it is now that the Senate report proved collusion.

Yeah.  Uh huh.  

 

The Senate Report did not prove or even assert collusion lol.

He said he had evidence. He didn't say "the senate is withholding evidence from me." This isn't particularly complicated. 

3 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

Now that it is proven, what do we hear from the cult?

 

Crickets. 

What was proven? 

  • Upvote 1
Benny Baker Rising Star

Benny Baker

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

Crabby guy here. 

Life is negotiation, give and take. 

I'll give legalized weed ... if ... and there's always one of those ... if you give me my ask:

 

Driving under influence, proven by blood test, and you kill someone gets you the death penalty. Period. 

And that's weed ... or booze. 

 

I'll give you the play toy, but I want the friction to make sure misuse is not worth the risk. 

 

Signed,
A guy who's been broadsided by drunk going 50 mph in town. 

What blood test do you use to confirm that the driver was actually under the influence of marijuana before you put him/her to death? 

If the driver's positive blood test was from last week's marijuana use, putting him/her to death might be a bit Draconian no matter how tragic the car wreck was.

  • Upvote 1
Hayduke1 Enthusiast

Hayduke1

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

Crabby guy here. 

Life is negotiation, give and take. 

I'll give legalized weed ... if ... and there's always one of those ... if you give me my ask:

 

Driving under influence, proven by blood test, and you kill someone gets you the death penalty. Period. 

And that's weed ... or booze. 

 

I'll give you the play toy, but I want the friction to make sure misuse is not worth the risk. 

 

Signed,
A guy who's been broadsided by drunk going 50 mph in town. 

What state gives the death penalty for manslaughter while driving under the influence?   Oh, I almost forgot. 

Period. 

The Sicatoka Grand Master

The Sicatoka

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Benny Baker said:

If the driver's positive blood test was from last week's marijuana use, putting him/her to death might be a bit Draconian no matter how tragic the car wreck was.

Tell that to the dead person killed by a pot user behind the wheel. 
(Golly, that "what about the children" type reply is actually kinda fun. :D ) 

 

I've said it before: Here's how you get away with murder in America --> Be seen in a bar 'consuming' (but pouring them in a plant); then, go drive over your victim; then, slosh down a fifth of whatever beverage it was you were pretending to drink at the bar and then hit a curb/pole/tree. Cops show up and you're blackout drunk. The worst you'll come away with is vehicular manslaughter (and that's if you have a bad lawyer). 

The Sicatoka Grand Master

The Sicatoka

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

What state gives the death penalty for manslaughter while driving under the influence?   Oh, I almost forgot. 

Period. 

I'm elevating the penalty.

Friction. 

Benny Baker Rising Star

Benny Baker

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, The Sicatoka said:

Tell that to the dead person killed by a pot user behind the wheel. 

Right.  But I asked about the person who used marijuana last week, not someone using pot behind the wheel.

The Sicatoka Grand Master

The Sicatoka

Posted
Posted
Just now, Benny Baker said:

Right.  But I asked about the person who used marijuana last week, not someone using pot behind the wheel.

Same dude.

Risk. Reward.

Friction. 

Hayduke1 Enthusiast

Hayduke1

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

I'm elevating the penalty.

Friction. 

Ok. 

It did make me look. 

Worst state to do this is North Dakota.  Up to life in prison.

Least amount of incarceration time possible is Maryland.  Up to 5 years imprisonment. 

Benny Baker Rising Star

Benny Baker

Posted
Posted
Just now, The Sicatoka said:

Same dude.

Risk. Reward.

Friction. 

Sentencing someone to death for last week's pot use.

Sorry, dude.  Your new proposal just lost all constitutional muster by the time your fingers left the keyboard.

 

UNDlaw80 Apprentice

UNDlaw80

Posted
Posted

 

32 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

Tell that to the dead person killed by a pot user behind the wheel. 
(Golly, that "what about the children" type reply is actually kinda fun. :D ) 

 

I've said it before: Here's how you get away with murder in America --> Be seen in a bar 'consuming' (but pouring them in a plant); then, go drive over your victim; then, slosh down a fifth of whatever beverage it was you were pretending to drink at the bar and then hit a curb/pole/tree. Cops show up and you're blackout drunk. The worst you'll come away with is vehicular manslaughter (and that's if you have a bad lawyer). 

 

Right, but would other irresponsible drivers be held to the same standard?    How about some ***hole joyriding going 50 miles over and kills someone?  A driver who falls asleep at the wheel because he chooses to drive home after a 16 hour shift?   Someone who drives a car not fit for the road?   Gross negligence comes in many forms.  

 

AlphaMikeFoxtrot Veteran

AlphaMikeFoxtrot

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, The Sicatoka said:

Crabby guy here. 

Life is negotiation, give and take. 

I'll give legalized weed ... if ... and there's always one of those ... if you give me my ask:

 

Driving under influence, proven by blood test, and you kill someone gets you the death penalty. Period. 

And that's weed ... or booze. 

 

I'll give you the play toy, but I want the friction to make sure misuse is not worth the risk. 

 

Signed,
A guy who's been broadsided by drunk going 50 mph in town. 

Have you actually tried weed? Equating it with alcohol suggests you haven't. Driving stoned isn't anything like driving drunk.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
1972 Mentor

1972

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

Have you actually tried weed? Equating it with alcohol suggests you haven't. Driving stoned isn't anything like driving drunk.

well that is the dumbest post of the day....and thats saying alot!

Bison06 Community Regular

Bison06

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

They get jealous when they see you with your mobile phone...

But tell the cops they can't touch this, I don't trust this when they try to rush I bust this

  • Upvote 1
1972 Mentor

1972

Posted
Posted
Just now, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

Let me guess, you're opposed to legalization.

never said that, but you seem to think you can smoke all you want and you will be just fine...ok

AlphaMikeFoxtrot Veteran

AlphaMikeFoxtrot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, 1972 said:

never said that, but you seem to think you can smoke all you want and you will be just fine...ok

I said equating weed with alcohol is not the right perspective. And I don't think fear of stoned drivers should prevent legalization.

  • Upvote 2
  • Popular Post
UNDBIZ Experienced

UNDBIZ

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
13 minutes ago, UNDlaw80 said:

Right, but would other irresponsible drivers be held to the same standard?    How about some ***hole joyriding going 50 miles over and kills someone?  A driver who falls asleep at the wheel because he chooses to drive home after a 16 hour shift?   Someone who drives a car not fit for the road?   Gross negligence comes in many forms.  

And texting is probably more dangerous than all the rest.

  • Upvote 9
1972 Mentor

1972

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

I said equating weed with alcohol is not the right perspective. And I don't think fear of stoned drivers should prevent legalization.

well, working in an industry where i am in and out of alot of different cars, you would be shocked(well maybe not you, i guess) at how many people smoke weed in their vehicles...it is crazy.  the amount of vehicles that have an empty alchol container, or bottle cap in them compared to a smoked up vehicle is almost close to 50-1 on the weed side.  so, yes, it is a big problem when it isnt legal, i can only imagine if it was legal

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...