ClassB Posted June 14, 2016 Posted June 14, 2016 A forward thinking individual would have submitted 'Fighting- Foxes, -Hens, -Mice, -Rats, -Bears, -Zebras, -Penguins, -Coyotes, -Kitties, -Cats, -Giraffes, -Elephants, Etc.' so that one 'Fighting ______ (animal)' wouldn't stand out above the rest. Sigh. Quote
Blackheart Posted June 15, 2016 Posted June 15, 2016 4 hours ago, ClassB said: A forward thinking individual would have submitted 'Fighting- Foxes, -Hens, -Mice, -Rats, -Bears, -Zebras, -Penguins, -Coyotes, -Kitties, -Cats, -Giraffes, -Elephants, Etc.' so that one 'Fighting ______ (animal)' wouldn't stand out above the rest. Sigh. Right...each one is as horrible as the previous submission. Quote
KoolGuy2K Posted June 15, 2016 Posted June 15, 2016 A new AHL team starting this fall. I'm sure our boring new logo will look something like this. Quote
Fetch Posted June 15, 2016 Posted June 15, 2016 I liked this name https://m.facebook.com/TRFNorskiesJrA/ Quote
Blackheart Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 7 hours ago, KoolGuy2K said: A new AHL team starting this fall. I'm sure our boring new logo will look something like this. I'm afraid you are probably right. Quote
ScottM Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 17 hours ago, KoolGuy2K said: A new AHL team starting this fall. I'm sure our boring new logo will look something like this. It looks like a parakeet. 1 Quote
The Sicatoka Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 Scott, why didn't you submit the nickname "martini swillin' boners" with your avatar as a logo? 2 Quote
Siouxperfan7 Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 University of North Dakota Warhawks. Why didn't anyone think of that?!! http://www.grandforksherald.com/sports/4056069-junior-hockey-team-minnesota-names-itself-warhawks Quote
CMSioux Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 You didn't see the memo from the LIC (Liberals in Charge): No names associated with war or killing Too easy to relate to Native American imagry Not unique - there are warhawks in Wisconsin and probably at least a have dozen more out there. (oops I guess that rule slipped by them) Quote
darell1976 Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 2 hours ago, Siouxperfan7 said: University of North Dakota Warhawks. Why didn't anyone think of that?!! http://www.grandforksherald.com/sports/4056069-junior-hockey-team-minnesota-names-itself-warhawks Louisiana-Monroe thought of it. Quote
ArchyAlum11 Posted June 17, 2016 Author Posted June 17, 2016 So we find out next week. We'll see how they did, My personal bet is on something generic and boring. I sincerely hope to be eating those words when the logo is reveled but I am not optimistic. http://www.wdaz.com/news/north-dakota/4055839-unveiling-new-und-logo-only-few-days-away Quote
ericpnelson Posted June 17, 2016 Posted June 17, 2016 Schafer says "It's really cool". He wouldn't lie to us, would he? Quote
dagies Posted June 17, 2016 Posted June 17, 2016 You know, Schafer ripped the nickname selection process. He wasn't afraid to speak his mind there. He could be saying nice things about the logo "It's really cool" just because he's still repping UND, but if he really didn't like the logo he could have said something nice that seemed a little less off-the-cuff and genuine. Of course, I'm reading an awful lot into a 3 word quote in the newspaper. I'm concerned like the rest of you but am trying to remain hopeful. Quote
Teeder11 Posted June 17, 2016 Posted June 17, 2016 I would say "really cool" is overstating it a bit. It's certainly not terrible. I would go so far as to say it's a decent job. But then again, I was not particularly enamored with the Bennett Brien Indian head logo as a pure marketing logo, either. At first, I thought the Brien logo was too busy, or maybe too intricate, and would be hard to replicate on caps and shirts and uniforms. But, over time, it grew on me a lot, until I fell deeply in love with it (probably due to its association with our school's tradition and legacy). Obviously, many other folks felt the same way, but whether they felt that way right away or warmed up to it like I did is another matter. Maybe the same will happen this time, although, it's different in that we are carting out a whole new thing that replaces a deeply adored and iconic image. So it won't be apples to apples by any stretch. As I say, all the time now, expect this not to be readily embraced because of the deep seeded anxiety and hurt surrounding this whole transition process -- and the fact that this stuff is so damned subjective anyway. Quote
jdub27 Posted June 17, 2016 Posted June 17, 2016 31 minutes ago, Teeder11 said: As I say, all the time now, expect this not to be readily embraced because of the deep seeded anxiety and hurt surrounding this whole transition process -- and the fact that this stuff is so damned subjective anyway. Judging reactions will be tough, especially factoring in that there is a good portion of people that already have their minds made up that they hate it and won't accept it. SME's other work has been pretty good and it sounds like they took a lot of input so I'm hoping that the result is something that isn't universally rejected and then, with time, will grow on the fan base. Having the athletic teams both accept it and perform well on the field will go a long way into a smoother transition. Quote
Teeder11 Posted June 17, 2016 Posted June 17, 2016 3 minutes ago, jdub27 said: Judging reactions will be tough, especially factoring in that there is a good portion of people that already have their minds made up that they hate it and won't accept it. SME's other work has been pretty good and it sounds like they took a lot of input so I'm hoping that the result is something that isn't universally rejected and then, with time, will grow on the fan base. Having the athletic teams both accept it and perform well on the field will go a long way into a smoother transition. Well said. I love the football team's approach to the new name ( as well as other athletic programs on campus). They have decided to own it and embrace it. I see that continuing with the new logo, too. 1 Quote
InHeavenThereIsNoBeer Posted June 17, 2016 Posted June 17, 2016 1 hour ago, Teeder11 said: I would say "really cool" is overstating it a bit. It's certainly not terrible. I would go so far as to say it's a decent job. But then again, I was not particularly enamored with the Bennett Brien Indian head logo as a pure marketing logo, either. At first, I thought the Brien logo was too busy, or maybe too intricate, and would be hard to replicate on caps and shirts and uniforms. But, over time, it grew on me a lot, until I fell deeply in love with it (probably due to its association with our school's tradition and legacy). Obviously, many other folks felt the same way, but whether they felt that way right away or warmed up to it like I did is another matter. Maybe the same will happen this time, although, it's different in that we are carting out a whole new thing that replaces a deeply adored and iconic image. So it won't be apples to apples by any stretch. As I say, all the time now, expect this not to be readily embraced because of the deep seeded anxiety and hurt surrounding this whole transition process -- and the fact that this stuff is so damned subjective anyway. Hold up, you've seen the new logo?!! Quote
ScottM Posted June 17, 2016 Posted June 17, 2016 On 6/16/2016 at 9:51 AM, The Sicatoka said: Scott, why didn't you submit the nickname "martini swillin' boners" with your avatar as a logo? I'm not sure Social Distortion would be amenable to UND using Skelly, but I could ask. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted June 17, 2016 Posted June 17, 2016 1 hour ago, ScottM said: I'm not sure Social Distortion would be amenable to UND using Skelly, but I could ask. C'mon man, with your skills you could negotiate some sort of agreement. 1 Quote
Teeder11 Posted June 17, 2016 Posted June 17, 2016 1 hour ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said: Hold up, you've seen the new logo?!! Yes and no. I was invited to be part of one of several focus groups in which versions or "directions" for potential new logos were discussed. So I do not know which one Ed ultimately will choose but I have an idea of the direction that designers were aiming for. Quote
InHeavenThereIsNoBeer Posted June 17, 2016 Posted June 17, 2016 Just now, Teeder11 said: Yes and no. I was invited to be part of one of several focus groups in which versions or "directions" for potential new logos were discussed. So I do not know which one Ed ultimately will choose but I have an idea of the direction that designers were aiming for. Care to give us any more info on what direction the logos were going? I'm not a patient person Quote
Siouxperfan7 Posted June 17, 2016 Posted June 17, 2016 I've seen it!! It's a hawk with accents of green white and black colors in the logo. Looks pretty sweet!! Was that too vague, or did you want a better description? Quote
Siouxphan27 Posted June 17, 2016 Posted June 17, 2016 28 minutes ago, Siouxperfan7 said: I've seen it!! It's a hawk with accents of green white and black colors in the logo. Looks pretty sweet!! Was that too vague, or did you want a better description? Is it a bird, or a plane, or......is it........... Superlame?! 1 Quote
The Sicatoka Posted June 17, 2016 Posted June 17, 2016 2 hours ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said: Care to give us any more info on what direction the logos were going? I'm not a patient person Just like Fetch's avatar. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.