SiouxVolley Posted April 20, 2016 Author Posted April 20, 2016 11 minutes ago, bison73 said: Same tactic you use every time some one questions your predictions. Just like clock work you deflect by trying to lump them in to the BV crowd and then bring up one of the predictions that you actually got right out of the thousands youve made.. Of course we cant forget the patting yourself on the back all the while. So predictable. You and your ilk don't know the difference between a prediction and message board speculation. This is a predictive thread while there is the conference realignment thread is news and speculation. There is a big difference that your small mind can't wrap itself around. Quote
nodak651 Posted April 20, 2016 Posted April 20, 2016 I think we should start a new thread to track ALL of SiouxVolley's predictions. Quote
JohnboyND7 Posted April 20, 2016 Posted April 20, 2016 Could call it Internet Hour at the State Hospital Quote
zonadub Posted April 20, 2016 Posted April 20, 2016 C'mon now. These are the most entertaining threads on the board. Love reading the indignation of the bison crowd. Do any of us have a good historical record of predictions? Quote
bison73 Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 4 hours ago, SiouxVolley said: You and your ilk don't know the difference between a prediction and message board speculation. This is a predictive thread while there is the conference realignment thread is news and speculation. There is a big difference that your small mind can't wrap itself around. Surprised you didnt use your well used line---"you need to read between the lines" " """Seems to me you were one of the scoffers that went along with the bizon troll crowd when I said that UND will get in the Big Sky before we even announced going to DI. The troll crowd was apoplectic with laughter and many Sioux fans were embarrassed that I had such a bold prediction. Stood by that thought even through the long transition and flirtations with Double and the Slummit. Those messages here seem to be forgotten, so just wanted to remind you all of history. This summer there will be a call from P5 schools to change the FBS moveup rules. Don't know the date.""" So you are saying that the rule change youve been espousing numerous times is just speculation and not a prediction? Or does the speculation change to prediction if the speculation comes true? Quote
SiouxVolley Posted April 21, 2016 Author Posted April 21, 2016 1 hour ago, bison73 said: Surprised you didnt use your well used line---"you need to read between the lines" " """Seems to me you were one of the scoffers that went along with the bizon troll crowd when I said that UND will get in the Big Sky before we even announced going to DI. The troll crowd was apoplectic with laughter and many Sioux fans were embarrassed that I had such a bold prediction. Stood by that thought even through the long transition and flirtations with Double and the Slummit. Those messages here seem to be forgotten, so just wanted to remind you all of history. This summer there will be a call from P5 schools to change the FBS moveup rules. Don't know the date.""" So you are saying that the rule change youve been espousing numerous times is just speculation and not a prediction? Or does the speculation change to prediction if the speculation comes true? For the dimwitted trolls that infest this board, I'll be sure to state whether a statement is a prediction or speculation in the future. Sort of like the entirety of bisonville first rolled with laughter when I stated UND will definitely go DI, when that board said we couldnt and wouldnt, when I said for years that the Big Sky will be our home and that was a running joke there for years during the transition, and now I have said the Big Sky will go FBS and that is a running joke over there among the nim wits. History keeps repeating itself. Quote
Siouan Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 Quote Given that "Interim UND President Ed Schafer has said repeatedly .... to media this round of cuts is a complete reshaping of the budget that will ultimately have an impact of about $22 million in the next three to five years." ... how can there be any realistic discussion of moving to FBS. The school, may be lucky to even have a football program after all the cuts are done.... much less have resources to move to FBS even if warmly invited by some FBS conference. 1 4 Quote
bison73 Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 1 hour ago, SiouxVolley said: For the dimwitted trolls that infest this board, I'll be sure to state whether a statement is a prediction or speculation in the future. Sort of like the entirety of bisonville first rolled with laughter when I stated UND will definitely go DI, when that board said we couldnt and wouldnt, when I said for years that the Big Sky will be our home and that was a running joke there for years during the transition, and now I have said the Big Sky will go FBS and that is a running joke over there among the nim wits. History keeps repeating itself. You sure spend a lot of time over at BV. I think you really got trolled on the UND wont go D1. There isnt a person I know who didnt think you guys wouldnt be following us. LOL Surprised you havent reminded us AGAIN of your Bakken speculation. Or was that prediction????? FYI your prediction that the BSC going FBS is a joke here also. Just so you know. Quote
darell1976 Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 55 minutes ago, Siouan said: UND didn't build a million dollar plus IPF just for track and softball if getting rid of football is going to be an option. As bad as things get people will support football, and as for the idea going FBS, it's not as crazy as any other Dakota team going. Quote
bison73 Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 17 minutes ago, darell1976 said: UND didn't build a million dollar plus IPF just for track and softball if getting rid of football is going to be an option. As bad as things get people will support football, and as for the idea going FBS, it's not as crazy as any other Dakota team going. Hey Im just going by what your fans have said about SV on some other venues. Nothing about teams moving up. Quote
darell1976 Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 10 minutes ago, bison73 said: Hey Im just going by what your fans have said about SV on some other venues. And I'm just stating UND won't drop football and about going FBS we laugh at your fans who think the Bison should go, your fans laugh that we should go. It's a rivalry and at one point we will both go FBS. When we go FBS is the question, and this budget crisis set by the state throws a wrench into things, but it's all a wait and see. Quote
bison73 Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 1 minute ago, darell1976 said: And I'm just stating UND won't drop football and about going FBS we laugh at your fans who think the Bison should go, your fans laugh that we should go. It's a rivalry and at one point we will both go FBS. When we go FBS is the question, and this budget crisis set by the state throws a wrench into things, but it's all a wait and see. Who thinks you would drop football? I dont get where you are coming from on this. Quote
SiouxVolley Posted April 21, 2016 Author Posted April 21, 2016 37 minutes ago, bison73 said: You sure spend a lot of time over at BV. I think you really got trolled on the UND wont go D1. There isnt a person I know who didnt think you guys wouldnt be following us. LOL Surprised you havent reminded us AGAIN of your Bakken speculation. Or was that prediction????? FYI your prediction that the BSC going FBS is a joke here also. Just so you know. There were only umpteen threads about UND staying DII and all the "wise men" assembled there said hockey was a noose around our necks that will keep us DII. Later the narrative was changed where women's hockey was a noose around our necks. When I stated that hockey pulls in more money than NDSU football, the inmates melted down and went berserk over there. Your a total joke, but that it obviously hasn't sunk in yet. But look at me, I'm arguing with an idiot. Quote
SiouxVolley Posted April 21, 2016 Author Posted April 21, 2016 1 hour ago, Siouan said: As stated previously many times, FBS brings in more money. If Idaho goes down to FCS, they will have to cut sports because they would lose out on massive guarantee game revenue, NCAA money, and CFP money. There is talk of a new CoBPA building, but the state isn't paying for it, so why is there talk? Same for FBS. 2 Quote
bison73 Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 1 hour ago, SiouxVolley said: There were only umpteen threads about UND staying DII and all the "wise men" assembled there said hockey was a noose around our necks that will keep us DII. Later the narrative was changed where women's hockey was a noose around our necks. When I stated that hockey pulls in more money than NDSU football, the inmates melted down and went berserk over there. Your a total joke, but that it obviously hasn't sunk in yet. But look at me, I'm arguing with an idiot. Quote
darell1976 Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 6 hours ago, bison73 said: Who thinks you would drop football? I dont get where you are coming from on this. This was in Siouan's post: Quote The school, may be lucky to even have a football program after all the cuts are done.. Quote
Siouan Posted April 22, 2016 Posted April 22, 2016 I actually don't believe cutting the football program is that far fetched. Sioux ID is with Hockey, not football. With the current interim President, (former Gov), it is certainly possible he could see the state benefiting from Sioux = Hockey; Bison = Football. Isn't that what sort of happened this year.... 2 national championships... 1 football, 1 hockey. Cutting Sioux FB to reinforce Sioux hockey = 5 national hockey championships ....? North Dakota, besides being the worlds 3d leading nuclear power, ... is also the nation's leading FB & Hockey powers. 11 Quote
Popular Post UNDBIZ Posted April 23, 2016 Popular Post Posted April 23, 2016 3 minutes ago, Siouan said: I actually don't believe cutting the football program is that far fetched. Sioux ID is with Hockey, not football. With the current interim President, (former Gov), it is certainly possible he could see the state benefiting from Sioux = Hockey; Bison = Football. Isn't that what sort of happened this year.... 2 national championships... 1 football, 1 hockey. Cutting Sioux FB to reinforce Sioux hockey = 5 national hockey championships ....? North Dakota, besides being the worlds 3d leading nuclear power, ... is also the nation's leading FB & Hockey powers. Careful, your bizun fandom is showing.... 5 Quote
UNDColorado Posted April 23, 2016 Posted April 23, 2016 8 minutes ago, Siouan said: I actually don't believe cutting the football program is that far fetched. Sioux ID is with Hockey, not football. With the current interim President, (former Gov), it is certainly possible he could see the state benefiting from Sioux = Hockey; Bison = Football. Isn't that what sort of happened this year.... 2 national championships... 1 football, 1 hockey. Cutting Sioux FB to reinforce Sioux hockey = 5 national hockey championships ....? North Dakota, besides being the worlds 3d leading nuclear power, ... is also the nation's leading FB & Hockey powers. Go away, adults are having a conversation. 3 Quote
Siouan Posted April 23, 2016 Posted April 23, 2016 Quote So you both don't see any problem with cuts and Gov Schafer in charge thinking like a politician rather than a dedicated alum... okay. I see, if it doesn't fit your tiny world view, it must be "them" are here .... narrow minded folks rarely see trouble coming until well after the fact. 5 Quote
UNDBIZ Posted April 23, 2016 Posted April 23, 2016 Just now, Siouan said: I have little to no problem with cuts named to date. A university president is always a politician, anyone thinking otherwise doesn't know anything about university presidents. Schafer cares about UND and it's future. The cuts he is making are for the benefit of UND, not ndsu. Quote
Siouan Posted April 23, 2016 Posted April 23, 2016 I didn't say anything about benefiting NDSU... I said benefiting the State of North Dakota..... Keep the focus on ND..... via perennial championships. That's probably too tough a concept for you all to understand ... benefit ND..... 6 Quote
homer Posted April 23, 2016 Posted April 23, 2016 1 minute ago, Siouan said: I didn't say anything about benefiting NDSU... I said benefiting the State of North Dakota..... Keep the focus on ND..... via perennial championships. Your game of imaginary is fun. Maybe he's positioning UND's academics and athletics for what he wants them to look like in 5 years. Trim some programs and get UNDs athletic dept looking more like a program in the MWC. 2 Quote
UNDBIZ Posted April 23, 2016 Posted April 23, 2016 8 minutes ago, Siouan said: I didn't say anything about benefiting NDSU... I said benefiting the State of North Dakota..... Keep the focus on ND..... via perennial championships. That's probably too tough a concept for you all to understand ... benefit ND..... Cutting football doesn't benefit UND or the state. You're bs act of being a neutral party is garbage. Continue spouting off and it'll be considered trolling. 4 Quote
Cratter Posted April 23, 2016 Posted April 23, 2016 50 minutes ago, UNDColorado said: Go away, adults are having a conversation. "This is an A and B conversation C your....." Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.