Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 7/17/2011 at 1:16 PM, GeauxSioux said:

Yes, yes, $6,000.00 is a terrible amount of money to spend sending people to the NCAA; just terrible. However, the hundreds of thousands that will need to be invested implementing this are of no consequence. Don't forget the lost revenue from sales. Yes, $6,000.00 is simply atrocious when viewed in light of those other, more modest costs......

  • Upvote 3
Posted
  On 7/19/2011 at 1:24 AM, petey23 said:

That's just terrible! So sorry for him and his family. It puts into perspective everything and the nickname , the Big Sky Conference, the NCHC, the NCAA all are secondary concerns to something like this. It does not seem like much because no one can see it or engage in a two-way conversation (at least verbally) but the Holy Spirit is never closer to someone than in circumstances like this, although it certainly does not feel that way I am sure.

Posted
  On 7/19/2011 at 1:38 AM, Chewey said:

That's just terrible! So sorry for him and his family. It puts into perspective everything and the nickname , the Big Sky Conference, the NCHC, the NCAA all are secondary concerns to something like this. It does not seem like much because no one can see it or engage in a two-way conversation (at least verbally) but the Holy Spirit is never closer to someone than in circumstances like this, although it certainly does not feel that way I am sure.

Thoughts and prayers to Bob Stenehjem's family and friends. And not to trivialize this into the nickname issue, but I didn't realize this:

  Quote
Stenehjem was most recently noted for his assistance to House Majority Leader Al Carlson, R-Fargo, who sponsored the legislation that put UND
Posted

With all of the technology available today, why can't they have a video conference with the NCAA? it would save money, time and would make scheduling a whole lot easier, I would think. This does not need to continue to drag on.

Posted
  On 7/21/2011 at 1:25 PM, GeauxSioux said:

With all of the technology available today, why can't they have a video conference with the NCAA? it would save money, time and would make scheduling a whole lot easier, I would think. This does not need to continue to drag on.

Why can't they, that is a very good question no one would even have to travel and there wouldn't be an unnecessary expense of 6,000.00 on the state tab.

Posted
  On 7/21/2011 at 8:17 PM, Goon said:

Why can't they, that is a very good question no one would even have to travel and there wouldn't be an unnecessary expense of 6,000.00 on the state tab.

Wouldn't it be subject to North Dakota Open Meeting Laws, then? That is something NCAA doesn't want, but it might not matter at this point, if all they are going to say is "Thanks, but, no thanks. Deal stands!"

Posted
  On 7/21/2011 at 8:17 PM, Goon said:

Why can't they, that is a very good question no one would even have to travel and there wouldn't be an unnecessary expense of 6,000.00 on the state tab.

I would imagine now there will be some fees to change the tickets also.

  On 7/21/2011 at 8:35 PM, Teeder11 said:

Wouldn't it be subject to North Dakota Open Meeting Laws, then? That is something NCAA doesn't want, but it might not matter at this point, if all they are going to say is "Thanks, but, no thanks. Deal stands!"

I still don't quite understand the Open Meeting part. These are a collection of state officials that do not constitute any legal body. Why would open meeting laws apply?

Posted
  On 7/21/2011 at 1:25 PM, GeauxSioux said:

With all of the technology available today, why can't they have a video conference with the NCAA? it would save money, time and would make scheduling a whole lot easier, I would think. This does not need to continue to drag on.

From my experience, videoconferences work well for "team meetings" of colleagues and coworkers who share common ground and common interests.

For meeting with neutral or adversarial parties, face to face is still far superior. Plus, going to Indy is a powerful signal from the state of North Dakota.

Posted
  On 7/22/2011 at 2:11 AM, farce poobah said:

From my experience, videoconferences work well for "team meetings" of colleagues and coworkers who share common ground and common interests.

For meeting with neutral or adversarial parties, face to face is still far superior. Plus, going to Indy is a powerful signal from the state of North Dakota.

This and humble pie is a dish best served in person. I'm sure Al Carlson will enjoy every bite.

Posted
  On 7/21/2011 at 8:35 PM, Teeder11 said:

Wouldn't it be subject to North Dakota Open Meeting Laws, then? That is something NCAA doesn't want, but it might not matter at this point, if all they are going to say is "Thanks, but, no thanks. Deal stands!"

Oh yeah that's right. My bad, I didn't think of that...

Posted
  On 7/22/2011 at 4:21 AM, Goon said:

Oh yeah that's right. My bad, I didn't think of that...

I plan to stay on the side of the truth, the tribes were supposed to be offended by the Fighting Sioux name, and Sprit Lake voted to say they were not

  • Upvote 1
Posted
  On 7/22/2011 at 6:29 AM, MAIDEN said:

I plan to stay on the side of the truth, the tribes were supposed to be offended by the Fighting Sioux name, and Sprit Lake voted to say they were not

  • Downvote 1
Posted

If the NCAA backed off now it would be them admitting they were wrong, and they are never wrong.

They thought they were wrong once ... but they were mistaken.

Posted
  On 7/22/2011 at 12:56 PM, The Sicatoka said:

If the NCAA backed off now it would be them admitting they were wrong, and they are never wrong.

They thought they were wrong once ... but they were mistaken.

Ha.

What if we are all wrong, and there is a miracle that occurs at the meeting? One way or another, we will have a FINAL answer after the meeting, which I am happy about.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
  On 7/22/2011 at 2:02 PM, LetsGoSioux! said:

Ha.

What if we are all wrong, and there is a miracle that occurs at the meeting? One way or another, we will have a FINAL answer after the meeting, which I am happy about.

The only miracle that can save us now is one out of Standing Rock. I hate to see the nickname go as much as anyone but we have to face facts and soldier on. I honestly don't know how we get from point A to point B in terms of a new identity (logo). I think that's the scariest thing about this transition, we take way more pride in our native american identity than other schools that had to retire them and even more than some that got to keep it. I would like to see UND take the time to choose something that a new, long lasting tradition can be built on, and not something that was rushed by a committee of people who don't truly care about athletics or our school's culture. I also wouldn't mind seeing all the faculty members who threw UND under the bus over the nickname issue replaced by new faculty, they are not good shepherds and have no place in our institution.

Posted
  On 7/22/2011 at 4:10 PM, MplsBison said:

What are the odds that Carlson will convince the NCAA executives that UND should continue to use the nickname with just one tribe's approval?

Honestly, between Slim and None. And Slim? He's on a train. Which train?

  On 7/22/2011 at 11:34 AM, GeauxSioux said:

Look down. You see those tracks? Now look waaaaay off towards the left. That's the train that already left the station.

Posted
  On 7/22/2011 at 5:35 PM, krangodance said:

Damn circular logic. I spent three hours today trying to figure this out.

You just stop on the spot on the circle that works best for you (or at least that's how the NCAA does it).

Posted
  On 7/22/2011 at 3:03 PM, IrishSiouxFan said:

I also wouldn't mind seeing all the faculty members who threw UND under the bus over the nickname issue replaced by new faculty, they are not good shepherds and have no place in our institution.

Never happen, most of these clowns that threw UND under the bus probably have tenure which basically means they would've had to commit some crime or be charged with misconduct to be fired.

Posted
  On 7/22/2011 at 6:32 PM, Goon said:

Never happen, most of these clowns that threw UND under the bus probably have tenure which basically means they would've had to commit some crime or be charged with misconduct to be fired.

You sir, understand the "University environment", and are exactly right.

Posted
  On 7/22/2011 at 6:32 PM, Goon said:

Never happen, most of these clowns that threw UND under the bus probably have tenure which basically means they would've had to commit some crime or be charged with misconduct to be fired.

Not unless some of there programs were reorganized of funding forced cutbacks of faculty lines. I'm sure some of these people have skeletons in their closets just begging to be discovered.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...