Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, HoopsFan03 said:

Might be the dumbest excuse of all time

Do any of the D1 Dakota schools have the names on back?   I've never really paid any attention to it.

Posted
57 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said:

Alot of coaches say that. Sure, saying the individual is less important than the team/program is true, but putting jerseys on the back will not promote selfishness as some would try and suggest. For colleges it’s a cool thing. As a player it would be an amazing feeling to see your last name on the back of the jersey for your team. 

Spot on!

  • Like 1
Posted

Not a fan that Kansas State is 1-2 with the only win vs UND. Lost to Arizona last night, Arizona is 3-0 wins over Hawaii, Weber St, and Kansas St. Kansas St is -9 pt spread on the year with a 1-3 record. The Army loss really hurts them too, their defense could not get off the field in the 2nd half. 2nd half vs Army the offensive plays run were 60 for Army, and 4 for KSU. 64 plays ran and they were only on offense for 4, that is just crazy. The back breaker was the Army attempted squib kick that hit a KSU guy and became a Army recovery. 

Posted
On 9/11/2025 at 9:31 AM, Hawkster said:

Years ago I had someone tell me it's the name on the front of the jersey that's important.   That's the rationale behind no player names.  Not saying I agree or disagree, just throwing that out.   Discuss.

Did we not have year that names on the back on atleast one set of jerseys was either North Dakota town names, or important people in UND history? 

Posted

Wtf is Schmidt's shirt? JYDs should not have an apostrophe unless it's supposed to mean the opposing team owns them in the last 5 minutes. 

Who approved a shirt that most 5th graders would realize is grammatically incorrect.

Posted
6 minutes ago, southpaw said:

Wtf is Schmidt's shirt? JYDs should not have an apostrophe unless it's supposed to mean the opposing team owns them in the last 5 minutes. 

Who approved a shirt that most 5th graders would realize is grammatically incorrect.

Or the refs

Posted
3 minutes ago, southpaw said:

Was it the refs would couldn't kick an XP or get a stop on 4th and 11?

The kicking game and poor play calling are what let us down today.

The defense was great most of the game, but they can't do everything.

Posted

I think the kids are close.  Mental stuff bites us again, and we beat the dead horse of what should have been.

I feel a lot better about this group than years past.

Valpo....Win

At UNI....Win

Youngstown....Win

At Souther Ill....win

Indiana State....win

At South Dakota....toss up

NDSU....Loss.

At Murray....Win

SDSU.....Win

I think the group needs to be 6-2 going into game in Vermillion.  If they lose at UNI and are 2-3 then we are looking at a race to 6-6 and some what ifs.

Posted
1 minute ago, Wilbur said:

I think the kids are close.  Mental stuff bites us again, and we beat the dead horse of what should have been.

I feel a lot better about this group than years past.

Valpo....Win

At UNI....Win

Youngstown....Win

At Souther Ill....win

Indiana State....win

At South Dakota....toss up

NDSU....Loss.

At Murray....Win

SDSU.....Win

I think the group needs to be 6-2 going into game in Vermillion.  If they lose at UNI and are 2-3 then we are looking at a race to 6-6 and some what ifs.

Depends on what refs show up too

Posted
29 minutes ago, Wilbur said:

I think the kids are close.  Mental stuff bites us again, and we beat the dead horse of what should have been.

I feel a lot better about this group than years past.

Valpo....Win

At UNI....Win

Youngstown....Win

At Souther Ill....win

Indiana State....win

At South Dakota....toss up

NDSU....Loss.

At Murray....Win

SDSU.....Win

I think the group needs to be 6-2 going into game in Vermillion.  If they lose at UNI and are 2-3 then we are looking at a race to 6-6 and some what ifs.

USD barely survived Northern Colorado at home. I think we win that one.

Posted
2 minutes ago, fightingsioux4life said:

USD barely survived Northern Colorado at home. I think we win that one.

Yeah, bizarre that UNC with 1st and goal inside the 3 couldn’t punch it in for the win in the last minute, then settle for the field goal from inside the one instead of going for it on the road.  

Posted

This is a good football team. We should be in the playoffs, no doubt. They just need to figure out how to close a damn game. So close to being 3-0 but here we sit at 1-2. 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, sioux24/7 said:

This is a good football team. We should be in the playoffs, no doubt. They just need to figure out how to close a damn game. So close to being 3-0 but here we sit at 1-2. 

The stupid record thing always gets in the way with UND football 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, Wilbur said:

I think the kids are close.  Mental stuff bites us again, and we beat the dead horse of what should have been.

I feel a lot better about this group than years past.

Valpo....Win

At UNI....Win

Youngstown....Win

At Souther Ill....win

Indiana State....win

At South Dakota....toss up

NDSU....Loss.

At Murray....Win

SDSU.....Win

I think the group needs to be 6-2 going into game in Vermillion.  If they lose at UNI and are 2-3 then we are looking at a race to 6-6 and some what ifs.

Don’t count on any win with UND football

Posted

Other than not closing games out, I think the most frustrating thing so far for me is the RB rotation. Leigh is a good pass catcher but he’s not a very good runner, imo. Would rather see a heavier rotation of Seidl and Ziebarth. 

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...