SiouxFanatic Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 Congrats to the NCHC refs, picking up the tie on behalf of Miami. I’m still completely mystified by the no goal call. 1
bcblues Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 Just now, yzerman19 said: UND should seriously protest that absolutely horrible call. We are the most powerful program in the league in terms of revenue... Fortunately, that does not impact officiating (or at least it shouldn't)
TNF Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 Start tomorrow night 5-4 with 28.5 seconds left on the clock?
bcblues Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 There were still some perplexing calls, none more so than the absolutely horrible no goal.
yzerman19 Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 1 minute ago, Oxbow6 said: Piss poor result. Goes as a tie for Pairwise. Not sure who was worse down the stretch.....Stripes or Weatherby don't forget giving up 2 goals on your first two shots again in the first
06 Sioux Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 We got hosed we got hosed in different area codes area codes hosed. 1
yzerman19 Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 1 minute ago, bcblues said: Fortunately, that does not impact officiating (or at least it shouldn't) c'mon...you're a grown-up...you know how the real world works. It absolutely affects everything.
CarpeRemote Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 Just now, Oxbow6 said: Piss poor result. Goes as a tie for Pairwise. Not sure who was worse down the stretch.....Stripes or Weatherby Lot of sloppy plays. Frisch no-look turnover. JBD cross ice pass to nobody to name a few.
Emerald joker Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 Well we all know Don Adams doesn’t really care about it 2
Wilbur Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 That's a ticky tack call in OT.....but it's been called that way.
bcblues Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 4v3 UND That was at least the second slash I saw, so good call.
UND1983 Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 Anybody clarify the rule about the puck touching the Miami stick after the high-stick?
Oxbow6 Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 1 minute ago, UND1983 said: Anybody clarify the rule about the puck touching the Miami stick after the high-stick? Nullifies the high stick. It's a good goal on any interpretation 1
bcblues Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 "When Crowder turns sideways he can block out the sun."
Wilbur Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 Just now, UND1983 said: Anybody clarify the rule about the puck touching the Miami stick after the high-stick? If our guy did high stick the puck the Miami player would have to possess the puck to negate the high stick. Not just touch it.
Emerald joker Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 2 minutes ago, UND1983 said: Anybody clarify the rule about the puck touching the Miami stick after the high-stick? Does it really matter? Nothing is going to happen or they’re going to say whoops we missed a call 1
brianvf Posted January 18, 2020 Posted January 18, 2020 Just now, Oxbow6 said: Nullifies the high stick Except in this case, I guess.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now