Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm sure these coaches have buyouts. So, if the school rather not have to buyout the coach, let the contract expire. I'd rather not spend the money to buyout a coach if their contract is going to end in a year or two and spend the money on what the school needs. 

Posted

Volleyball the three years our current coach has been here:

conference record of 9-9 in 2022

conference record of 4-12 in 2023

conference record of 2-14 in 2024

Doesn’t look like we are in a positive trajectory and as new recruits are brought in doesn’t look like it is working.

In 2022 we lost our last six conference games and then lost the conference playoff game. We got beat 3-0 in our last five conference games. Free fall 

our two wins in 2024 were over ORU - the last place team. We won 10 sets in our 14 conference losses. Note that one of our best players got hurt in 2024.

 I hope coach can turn it around. Doesn’t appear to be any accountability in this programs and others.

  • Upvote 2
Posted
9 hours ago, SiouxFan100 said:

The AD has to be held accountable for so many programs in the tank.

Exactly!

The whole argument here is about consistency. Why do some coaches (every other one) that are just as bad and have just as bad of programs get contract extensions while the soccer coach that has an outstanding Title 9 complaint has his contract let expire.
 

I definitely don’t see any potential issues there :whistling: continued poor management by Chaves and his boys 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
43 minutes ago, HoopsFan03 said:

Exactly!

The whole argument here is about consistency. Why do some coaches (every other one) that are just as bad and have just as bad of programs get contract extensions while the soccer coach that has an outstanding Title 9 complaint has his contract let expire.
 

I definitely don’t see any potential issues there :whistling: continued poor management by Chaves and his boys 

There are some coaches with poor records for sure but show me which ones are sub 30% overall win percentage.  Also I believe our soccer coach wasn’t given a 8 year contract out of the gate so he must have been given an extension.  
 

I am not arguing for the other coaches.  I’m arguing that our AD finally lets someone go and some try to argue it wasn’t because of performance.  The teams record was below poor.  Now on to the next one.  In some of these sports you aren’t buying out a coach with our budget.  

Posted

Women’s sports under Chaves has been disaster we have been close to having winning program since he has entered position of AD. Also all the coaches are his hirings and at volleyball ball on his second hiring.this is not track record to be proud of prior to his coming here we had several championships in volleyball, basketball, and we’re top one or two in soccer. There has been no push by athletic department to improve performance. I have to believe Chaves hasn’t held winning as priority but other performances by players and coaches for the program but bottom line winning is ultimate goal especially at division I level.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Our basketball teams have shown some good and some bad. Should both finish above 500. Kinda a low bar.

The title 9 complaint concerns me - hopefully that gets settled soon. I don’t know the process though. Just not a good look for the University.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...