stoneySIOUX Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 17 minutes ago, Fetch said: But I'm amazed at overall NCAA Mens Hockey - are the best teams / programs winning ? Or is it the Hot Goalies or just Luck or lack there of ? Weird Season After watching all three of those games, I feel like it was pretty clear we were the best team in Fargo, this weekend (or at least we played the best). But hey, that's hockey. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 Just rewatched the game and we were offsides on that goal. Sucks, but we were. It was strange, though, to see that lineman who would not drop the puck all game jump in and make the call. Also, contrary to what some would say Wolanin was our best player. His jump that "caused" a goal was a good aggressive play and the forward was in position to cover for him but didn't do a good enough job. Wolanin Peski Bowen and Poganski were beasts. And finally our pp without Poolman, other than the first one, was complete garbage. Does that mean fire the bald guy? I don't know, but it was a big reason we lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
90siouxfan Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 20 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said: Just rewatched the game and we were offsides on that goal. Sucks, but we were. It was strange, though, to see that lineman who would not drop the puck all game jump in and make the call. Also, contrary to what some would say Wolanin was our best player. His jump that "caused" a goal was a good aggressive play and the forward was in position to cover for him but didn't do a good enough job. Wolanin Peski Bowen and Poganski were beasts. And finally our pp without Poolman, other than the first one, was complete garbage. Does that mean fire the bald guy? I don't know, but it was a big reason we lost. please tell me ya watched it on youtube.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 1 hour ago, 90siouxfan said: please tell me ya watched it on youtube.... I recorded it. It will be on WatchESPN though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 3 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said: I recorded it. It will be on WatchESPN though. Which camera angle did they show that clearly showed offsides? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 19 minutes ago, homer said: Which camera angle did they show that clearly showed offsides? Just the zoomed in one from the far side. Hoff had both feet in the zone clearly and the puck wasn't in yet. He could've dragged to stay on but didn't unfortunately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 13 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said: Just the zoomed in one from the far side. Hoff had both feet in the zone maybe and the puck wasn't in yet. He could've dragged to stay on but didn't unfortunately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 No you could clearly see both his skates were in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sioux rube Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 2 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said: No you could clearly see both his skates were in. Yes he was offsides. Looking forward to next season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux Hawky Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 9 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said: No you could clearly see both his skates were in. There is 3 inches of tuuk on the bottom of the boot that is white. It does create an illusion. http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/how-geometry-created-the-illusion-of-a-flames-goal/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranger Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 40 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said: No you could clearly see both his skates were in. That call can not be conclusively made with the image(s) provided. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7>4 Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 31 minutes ago, Sioux Hawky said: There is 3 inches of tuuk on the bottom of the boot that is white. It does create an illusion. http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/how-geometry-created-the-illusion-of-a-flames-goal/ Excellent post. My whole point is that there is no way you can rule that conclusive evidence showed the play offsides based on the angle that was used. The only person viewing the play from the correct position was the linesman who ruled a legal entry. At a minimum, they should look at this rule or install a camera along with blue line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranger Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 This situation probable doesn't occur that often, but maybe the NCAA should look at requiring host sites to have a blue line or vertical means of monitoring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 1 hour ago, geaux_sioux said: No you could clearly see both his skates were in. There was no angle shown during the live telecast that clearly showed offsides. If so snap a photo of your recording and post it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post InHeavenThereIsNoBeer Posted March 26, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted March 26, 2017 Was he offsides? Probably Was there 'conclusive evidence' to overturn our goal? I haven't seen it yet 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MafiaMan Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 26 minutes ago, homer said: There was no angle shown during the live telecast that clearly showed offsides. If so snap a photo of your recording and post it. 13 minutes ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said: Was he offsides? Probably Was there 'conclusive evidence' to overturn our goal? I haven't seen it yet I have watched the replay 75,000 times this weekend. Still looking for the smoking gun and "conclusive proof." 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emerald joker Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 3 minutes ago, MafiaMan said: I have watched the replay 75,000 times this weekend. Still looking for the smoking gun and "conclusive proof." Well the NCAA got their money from fargo and UND is out so I'm sure that "conclusive proof" is good enough for them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 move this regional one hour north and the ncaa double or triples their money...stupid neutral sites...each #1 should host on campus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MafiaMan Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 4 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: move this regional one hour north and the ncaa double or triples their money...stupid neutral sites...each #1 should host on campus You couldn't have both this year in Grand Forks... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 Just now, MafiaMan said: You couldn't have both this year in Grand Forks... both what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MafiaMan Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 1 minute ago, MafiaMan said: You couldn't have both this year in Grand Forks... 1 minute ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: both what? Tournament in GF and at the site of the #1 seed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 2 minutes ago, MafiaMan said: Tournament in GF and at the site of the #1 seed. agreed..just saying that if und was the number one seed it should've been at REA but this regional should've been at amsoil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ringneck28 Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 1 minute ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: agreed..just saying that if und was the number one seed it should've been at REA but this regional should've been at amsoil Duluth can't even sell out their own games and you want a regional there? Do we have any idea who is bidding for the next set of regionals? I would be willing to bet Fargo gets another one based on this last weekends success. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDBIZ Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 21 minutes ago, ringneck28 said: Duluth can't even sell out their own games and you want a regional there? Do we have any idea who is bidding for the next set of regionals? I would be willing to bet Fargo gets another one based on this last weekends success. Schloss had said UND bid Sioux Falls at one point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 53 minutes ago, ringneck28 said: Duluth can't even sell out their own games and you want a regional there? Do we have any idea who is bidding for the next set of regionals? I would be willing to bet Fargo gets another one based on this last weekends success. a regional is a whole different ball game compared to a home series versus western michigan when its 25 below Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.