siouxfan512 Posted October 18, 2016 Author Share Posted October 18, 2016 2 minutes ago, MoSiouxFan said: Reyes, Rich, Stanley, Greer, and Murray all listed as questionable for ISU. Only notable change on the two-deep is Hanson at no. 2 WILB (in place of an injured Rich?). Hanson!!! The INT machine! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post MoSiouxFan Posted October 18, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted October 18, 2016 6 minutes ago, siouxfan512 said: Hanson!!! The INT machine! Yeah, and what a character guy! Like to have a team full of his kind. Fifth year in the program, very little PT, made a 5th year position change, and now great to see him on the field a little bit and working his way up the depth chart. What a great example to the rest of the team for not being a quitter when some might say he had reason to. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDColorado Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 17 minutes ago, siouxfan512 said: INJURY REPORT vs. IDAHO STATE SS 8 Cole Reyes (questionable) LB 32 Taj Rich (questionable) LB 38 Dijon Murray (questionable) NG 77 Steve Greer (questionable) WR 81 Luke Stanley (questionable) I thought Flowers filled in for Reyes quite well. If Cole is not 100% hold him out because we will need him against Weber. Same goes for Taj Rich as he will also be needed against Weber. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJS Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 23 minutes ago, siouxfan512 said: INJURY REPORT vs. IDAHO STATE SS 8 Cole Reyes (questionable) LB 32 Taj Rich (questionable) LB 38 Dijon Murray (questionable) NG 77 Steve Greer (questionable) WR 81 Luke Stanley (questionable) Don't play any of them. Does anyone have any inside information on any of these injuries? I.e. do we know how close all are to getting back to 100%? Could all play if necessary? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxstudent Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 1 hour ago, MoSiouxFan said: Yeah, and what a character guy! Like to have a team full of his kind. Fifth year in the program, very little PT, made a 5th year position change, and now great to see him on the field a little bit and working his way up the depth chart. What a great example to the rest of the team for not being a quitter when some might say he had reason to. He is a great kid all around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shep Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Great for Jake. He's a really good guy too. So glad he gutted it out. Any news on Cloyd? Sick last week? Wasted RS pull? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 1 minute ago, shep said: Great for Jake. He's a really good guy too. So glad he gutted it out. Any news on Cloyd? Sick last week? Wasted RS pull? He was in blocking plenty at Sac St. Maybe he's gonna be our secret weapon later on in the year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxfan512 Posted October 18, 2016 Author Share Posted October 18, 2016 Does anyone know which scenario would help UND more, if either. Weber @ Souther Utah Would it be better to see SUU (A team we just smoked, beat Weber) or would it be better for Weber to beat SUU .... hopefully sneak into the top 25, and give us a chance to beat a top 25 team next week. I don't actually think winning this game would be enough for Weber to get in to top 25, but maybe? Either, just another talking point for this weekend .... leading up to Revenge is a dish best served cold (Part Two): UND vs. Weber I suppose it would be better to see Weber win, so we would have a shot at a 5-2 team (4-0 conf). Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxfan512 Posted October 18, 2016 Author Share Posted October 18, 2016 24 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said: He was in blocking plenty at Sac St. Maybe he's gonna be our secret weapon later on in the year. Catching a game winning TD in Frisco kind of secret weapon? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gundy1124 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 15 minutes ago, siouxfan512 said: Does anyone know which scenario would help UND more, if either. Weber @ Souther Utah Would it be better to see SUU (A team we just smoked, beat Weber) or would it be better for Weber to beat SUU .... hopefully sneak into the top 25, and give us a chance to beat a top 25 team next week. I don't actually think winning this game would be enough for Weber to get in to top 25, but maybe? Either, just another talking point for this weekend .... leading up to Revenge is a dish best served cold (Part Two): UND vs. Weber Weber is at Sothern Utah, then at UND, I like it.......back to back road games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxfan512 Posted October 18, 2016 Author Share Posted October 18, 2016 2 minutes ago, gundy1124 said: Weber is at Sothern Utah, then at UND, I like it.......back to back road games. Right, but as a UND fan, who would we prefer to win that one. I would assume Weber, so that when we play them, they would be considered a tougher opponent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Green Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Just now, siouxfan512 said: Right, but as a UND fan, who would we prefer to win that one. I would assume Weber, so that when we play them, they would be considered a tougher opponent. I like the idea of 2 undefeated in the conference teams duking it out at the Alerus next week. So Weber. As far at Strength of schedule i don't think it matters since we play both. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gundy1124 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 1 minute ago, siouxfan512 said: Right, but as a UND fan, who would we prefer to win that one. I would assume Weber, so that when we play them, they would be considered a tougher opponent. Bigger game if Weber wins. Here is to a 4 OT game with a lot of plays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxfan512 Posted October 18, 2016 Author Share Posted October 18, 2016 8 minutes ago, gundy1124 said: Bigger game if Weber wins. Here is to a 4 OT game with a lot of plays. Works for me. I didn't know if the committee put much stock into where a team was at the time they are beat. Meaning if, and that a big IF, Weber could sneak into the top 25 .... we could hopefully add a top 25 win to our resume, since our resume doesn't have too many ranked opponents. On the flip side, would the committee care if you beat a team before they are ranked. USD? Hopefully I'm explaining my question right. I know some other message boards really look at the ranking of the opponent at the time they play them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longtime fan Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 In the home stretch I would prefer weber to be at 5-2 rather then 4-3, so I'm hoping for a weber win. However, being it is in cedar city, I would expect a pissed off s utah team come out victorious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDBIZ Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 51 minutes ago, siouxfan512 said: Right, but as a UND fan, who would we prefer to win that one. I would assume Weber, so that when we play them, they would be considered a tougher opponent. Weber doesn't play Montana or EWU, so we want them to win every game except against UND. If Cal Poly beats EWU and then loses to Weber, it would be great for strength of schedule appearance purposes, IMO. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxfan512 Posted October 19, 2016 Author Share Posted October 19, 2016 Is it Saturday yet?!?!?! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDColorado Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 52 minutes ago, siouxfan512 said: Is it Saturday yet?!?!?! My goal is to finish the pheasant hunt by game time. really happy this one starts at 2:30 MTn! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 19 hours ago, siouxfan512 said: Works for me. I didn't know if the committee put much stock into where a team was at the time they are beat. Meaning if, and that a big IF, Weber could sneak into the top 25 .... we could hopefully add a top 25 win to our resume, since our resume doesn't have too many ranked opponents. On the flip side, would the committee care if you beat a team before they are ranked. USD? Hopefully I'm explaining my question right. I know some other message boards really look at the ranking of the opponent at the time they play them. I don't believe said committee can even speculate on what they are looking for. See last year as an example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dustin Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Was looking at ISU's schedule, and they have it absolutely brutal this year. Two FBS games (Colorado, Oregon St.), and starting last week, they play 6 of the top 7 in the Big Sky standings all in a row. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 One cannot help but really like Idaho St.'s coach Mike Kramer. The guy tells it like he sees it. Pretty good listen. http://740thefan.com/podcasts/jack-michaels-show/962/idaho-state-head-football-coach-mike-kramer/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDColorado Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 26 minutes ago, homer said: One cannot help but really like Idaho St.'s coach Mike Kramer. The guy tells it like he sees it. Pretty good listen. http://740thefan.com/podcasts/jack-michaels-show/962/idaho-state-head-football-coach-mike-kramer/ I do like him. Tells it like it is sort of guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 On 10/17/2016 at 0:03 PM, UNDBIZ said: Portland State had ZERO passing yards against ISU and still racked up 530 rushing yards and won 45-20. We should be able to run the ball. Should be able to have a lot of success on the ground & through the air against ISU.... Rudolph continues to call a very balanced game. The 2 ISU starting corners go 5'9" 155 & 5'8" 164. Backup CBs on the 2-deep are 6'0 170 & 5'10 165... I like our big WR's against that all day, everyday (especially if Stanley plays). Might not run away from them, but will win the 1-on-1 matchups, jump-balls, & back shoulder throws. IF the passing game is somehow out of sync, well, then just pound the rock all day like PSU did. Add in the revenge factor & UND rolls big in this one. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDBIZ Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 6 minutes ago, Westside said: Should be able to have a lot of success on the ground & through the air against ISU.... Rudolph continues to call a very balanced game. The 2 ISU starting corners go 5'9" 155 & 5'8" 164. Backup CBs on the 2-deep are 6'0 170 & 5'10 165... I like our big WR's against that all day, everyday (especially if Stanley plays). Might not run away from them, but will win the 1-on-1 matchups, jump-balls, & back shoulder throws. IF the passing game is somehow out of sync, well, then just pound the rock all day like PSU did. Add in the revenge factor & UND rolls big in this one. The size of their CBs should factor not just in the passing game, but the running game as well. I would expect our big WRs to manhandle them when blocking, again, especially if Stanley plays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 30 minutes ago, UNDBIZ said: The size of their CBs should factor not just in the passing game, but the running game as well. I would expect our big WRs to manhandle them when blocking, again, especially if Stanley plays. Think Mr. 5'8" 164 lbs wants to tackle Oliviera? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.