What do you think of the logo now??

[ArchyAlum11]

23 hours ago, ArchyAlum11 said:

I couldn't help myself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bn20oXFrxxg

[nodak651]

William and Mary new logo.... 

https://spark.adobe.com/page/RhcLGX2Bcu8Dg/

[geaux_sioux]

3 minutes ago, nodak651 said:

William and Mary new logo.... 

https://spark.adobe.com/page/RhcLGX2Bcu8Dg/

Is that a Griffin?

[UNDBIZ]

2 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said:

Is that a Griffin?

[stoneySIOUX]

On 7/23/2018 at 5:51 PM, UNDBIZ said:

So those don't resemble each other at all, but the current logo looks just like the USPS logo. Got it. 

Haha I don't think either look like what they are being compared to.

[UNDBIZ]

7 minutes ago, nodak651 said:

William and Mary new logo.... 

https://spark.adobe.com/page/RhcLGX2Bcu8Dg/

[UNDBIZ]

6 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said:

Is that a Griffin?

Found a full pic. 

[stoneySIOUX]

7 minutes ago, UNDBIZ said:

Found a full pic. 

Griffins are weird, but I don't hate that logo. It's different.

[The Sicatoka]

17 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said:

Is that a Griffin?

This is Griffin.

[The Sicatoka]

That new W&M logo is "recognizable"? 

[The Sicatoka]

17 minutes ago, stoneySIOUX said:

Griffins are weird, but I don't hate that logo. It's different.

It's a hot mess.

[UND1983]

29 minutes ago, UNDBIZ said:

Found a full pic. 

What in the F?

[geaux_sioux]

1 hour ago, stoneySIOUX said:

Griffins are weird, but I don't hate that logo. It's different.

It’s a dove on a bear with goblin wings what’s not to love. Could have just gone with manbearpig.

[UNDBIZ]

9 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said:

what’s not to love

Deep fry that right front leg and you've got yourself a nice, tasty chicken drumstick. 

[Siouxperfan7]

for all those saying how awful the fighting Hawks logo is, remember...it could be worse.  Case in point, William and Mary.

Need another example?  Look at the logo for our opening game football opponent Mississippi Valley State!!! 

[InHeavenThereIsNoBeer]

2 hours ago, UNDBIZ said:

Found a full pic. 

Looks like it's head is being sucked into a jet engine. And clearly trying to hide his club foot in the shadows. Poor guy...

[UNDBIZ]

42 minutes ago, Siouxperfan7 said:

for all those saying how awful the fighting Hawks logo is, remember...it could be worse.  Case in point, William and Mary.

Need another example?  Look at the logo for our opening game football opponent Mississippi Valley State!!! 

Looks like the sketch of a bored student.  You notice they slapped that thing on the side of their helmets too?  What a mess.

 

[The Sicatoka]

1 hour ago, geaux_sioux said:

It’s a dove on a bear with goblin wings what’s not to love. Could have just gone with manbearpig.

It's more lion than bear: look at the tail. And they're more like Pegasus wings. 

DoveLiPeg. 

[ChrisUND1]

3 hours ago, UNDBIZ said:

Found a full pic. 

Looks like a cross between a flying monkey from Wizard of Oz, and...wait for it....the US Postal Service logo.

[ChrisUND1]

[geaux_sioux]

5 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

It's more lion than bear: look at the tail. And they're more like Pegasus wings. 

DoveLiPeg. 

It’s a joke. A brown fury white body is obviously always a bear just like a white bird is always a dove. 

[stoneySIOUX]

4 hours ago, The Sicatoka said:

It's a hot mess.

I disagree. It's unique.

[geaux_sioux]

1 hour ago, stoneySIOUX said:

I disagree. It's unique.

It sure is unique. And fugly. Does my mail come faster because the USPS bird has four legs?

[Rebel_Sioux]

6 hours ago, Siouxperfan7 said:

for all those saying how awful the fighting Hawks logo is, remember...it could be worse.  Case in point, William and Mary.

Need another example?  Look at the logo for our opening game football opponent Mississippi Valley State!!! 

I think both of your examples are better than our current Hawk logo.

For those of you who think that a new secondary (or primary) Hawk logo wouldn't improve fan support than you haven't been listening (or reading). Sure, some die hard fans will never be appeased by anything other than Sioux, but most people that oppose the current logo dislike it for one of two reasons (or both):

1. No vote, an interim president made the choice

2. It's an objectively bad logo. 

If Kennedy has the opportunity to fix Schafer's mistake, than more power to him. 

There is the con that he will take heat for spending yet more money on the issue, but if he does it right I think it would be worth it. 

 

 

[southpaw]

9 hours ago, Rebel_Sioux said:

2. It's an objectively bad logo. 

 

 

How is it objectively bad?  Let's hear some facts, figures, graphic design concepts, etc on why it can be proven to be a bad logo.