Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

Did anyone else just see the phantom goalie interference call on Detroit in the Capitals game?

 

 

That was ridiculous. Not only waved off a goal but got sent to the sin bin to boot.

 

As a Caps fan, obviously a bad call.

Posted

As a Caps fan, obviously a bad call.

The words "worst call I have ever seen" are thrown around all the time...but, quite honestly, the worst call I have ever seen.

Posted

The words "worst call I have ever seen" are thrown around all the time...but, quite honestly, the worst call I have ever seen.

Be tough to top that one this season. Wow.

Posted

I've heard all the noise about this. I finally went out to see the video for myself. 

 

< speechless > 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EG-Hx2Wj1uQ

 

Inexplicably, the entire broadcasting crew blew this as well until Pierre McGuire corrected himself...how the official missed that, I have no clue.  Glendening was nowhere near Holtby when he made the call.

Posted

Not the NHL, but the AHL Bridgeport Sound Tigers goalie purposely dislodged the net so he didn't have to face a 2 on 0 breakaway. A penalty shot was awarded to the Springfield Falcons which was stopped by the Bridgeport goalie.    

Posted

Wild looked like a different team in the 3rd and made put some pressure on but Pittsburgh held them off for a 4-1 win. Very interesting call in the game that would have made it 3-2, the call was no goal on the ice because it didn't go in but replay clearly showed the puck cross the line so the ref comes out and rules it no goal because of goalie interference as Granlund was pushed onto the goalie by a Penguin defenseman and the ref said that goaltender interference isn't a reviewable play even though he had just reviewed the play for 2 minutes and it was clear that he had not called that on the ice.

Posted

Wild looked like a different team in the 3rd and made put some pressure on but Pittsburgh held them off for a 4-1 win. Very interesting call in the game that would have made it 3-2, the call was no goal on the ice because it didn't go in but replay clearly showed the puck cross the line so the ref comes out and rules it no goal because of goalie interference as Granlund was pushed onto the goalie by a Penguin defenseman and the ref said that goaltender interference isn't a reviewable play even though he had just reviewed the play for 2 minutes and it was clear that he had not called that on the ice.

Wild got screwed on that call for sure. Encouraging that they came out in the third with some fire. 82 games there will be a few nights like tonight. Now on the road for 3. 4 points would be nice.
Posted

If standing on top of a goalie and pushing his back down with one hand isn't goaltender interference, I don't know what is. Minny fans can cry and throw things on the ice all they want, they're wrong. That was a good call.

He got pushed into him. Call was bogus.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

If standing on top of a goalie and pushing his back down with one hand isn't goaltender interference, I don't know what is. Minny fans can cry and throw things on the ice all they want, they're wrong. That was a good call.

agree with Dave K on this one...ugh, that felt dirty.
  • Upvote 2
Posted

You're wrong, it was absolutely positively the right call. And even if that hadn't been goalie interference, the fact of the matter is that the Penguins DOMINATED that game for 3 periods and exposed the Mild to be the mediocre expansion team that they are. When you can go on the road, start your backup goalie, and still kick the snot out of your opponent... that just goes to show your opponent isn't even worthy of being on the same ice.

Watching it again Granlund was pushed into the goalie by the defenseman and it looks like he immediately slides off to the side of the goalie. The Wild only played decent in the 3rd period and still would have had a chance to win if not for the questionable call. The reason the Penguins probably started their backup goalie is because I believe their starter has yet to record a win against the Wild. Watching Sports Center this morning Melrose also believes it was a bad call and should have been a goal. The thing I was more mad about was if it was goaltender interference then the ref should have called it on the ice and known it was a not a reviewable call but instead it seemed like he went and reviewed the play and came up with the goaltender interference call. 

Posted

Watching it again Granlund was pushed into the goalie by the defenseman and it looks like he immediately slides off to the side of the goalie. The Wild only played decent in the 3rd period and still would have had a chance to win if not for the questionable call. The reason the Penguins probably started their backup goalie is because I believe their starter has yet to record a win against the Wild. Watching Sports Center this morning Melrose also believes it was a bad call and should have been a goal. The thing I was more mad about was if it was goaltender interference then the ref should have called it on the ice and known it was a not a reviewable call but instead it seemed like he went and reviewed the play and came up with the goaltender interference call.

Exactly. I looked at the replay more than once and I'm sticking with what I said. Bogus call but it's over and done. Now the concern is how bad is Parise hurt. Upper body injury. Not sure what happened to him.

Posted

If standing on top of a goalie and pushing his back down with one hand isn't goaltender interference, I don't know what is. Minny fans can cry and throw things on the ice all they want, they're wrong. That was a good call.

 

 

agree with Dave K on this one...ugh, that felt dirty.

 

Me too, Blackheart.  Granlund was hardly pushed into the goalie, and he made little to no effort to get up despite LaPanta's attempt to sway the viewer otherwise. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Exactly. I looked at the replay more than once and I'm sticking with what I said. Bogus call but it's over and done. Now the concern is how bad is Parise hurt. Upper body injury. Not sure what happened to him.

Agreed and on Parise I saw he is meeting with doctors today Vanek will fill in on the top line for him and that Parise won't go on the upcoming road trip.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...