siouxnatty#8 Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 I guess I stand corrected. Forgot about all the scoring we had coming back and the experience on the blue line. i guess im the one who stands corrected obviously this team has no talent do they, make sure you give them no credit Quote
sprig Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 i guess im the one who stands corrected obviously this team has no talent do they, make sure you give them no credit why r u angry today Quote
siouxnatty#8 Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 why r u angry today not angry guess just frustrated at people selling this team short, the reason we are in the f4 is obviously because we are one of the most talented teams in the country. Sorry about being condescending in my comment. I just think these kids deserve to be given more credit than just calling them overachievers imho 1 Quote
UNDBIZ Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 To be fair, I never said or insinuated any such comments as those attributed to me by your reply back to my original post. I wasn't attributing them to you. Merely pointing out that the "keep Hak" crew hasn't all been keeping the gloves up either. Not directed specifically at mafiaman: TBH, when the personal attacks start it just makes both sides look awful, but go ahead and keep plugging away. Quote
UNDBIZ Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 why r u angry today Everybody appears to be. Lot of overly defensive and antagonistic posters today. Must've been the storm..... Quote
UND-RedSox fan Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 this team has not overachieved, did anyone see goth put the fargo force on his shoulders and carry the team, this team is capable of even more than what they have shown. This team is built specificially to win in the ncaa tourn, give the team its due theyve underachieving in my eyes i think they are capable of even more You are seriously overestimating this team. They are definitely overachieving. Gothberg is probably better than Dell was but not head and shoulders better. He is a good not great goalie that seems to have really limited his biggest weakness (super soft goals), but they do still appear every now and then, including the greatest game of his life against Ferris. For our forwards. Pattyn, Gaarder, Rodwell, St. Clair, Chyzyk, and Panzarella would have never seen the ice on the Pony Express team. Parks would have been playing with Mario. Again, probably the second best forward we have on our team this year would have been a fourth liner three years ago. I'm as excited for the frozen four as anyone but I think we should also call a spade a spade and this year's team is overachieving. And there is nothing wrong with being overachievers. Yale wasn't one of the four best teams in the country last year and they won it all. The gophers probably had the best team in the country last year and lost in the first round. Quote
Redneksioux Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 Considering how und played in Canada.....and how they started their season.......and the nchc's out of conference record.....I think und has overachieved this year already. Will be happy to see them continue with this overachieving against the goofs! Quote
Ray77 Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 Everybody appears to be. Lot of overly defensive and antagonistic posters today. Must've been the storm..... HA - agreed! Quote
siouxnatty#8 Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 Everybody appears to be. Lot of overly defensive and antagonistic posters today. Must've been the storm..... from now on i will try to direct any future condescending comments to the rodents. Sorry oxbow Quote
geaux_sioux Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 not angry guess just frustrated at people selling this team short, the reason we are in the f4 is obviously because we are one of the most talented teams in the country. Sorry about being condescending in my comment. I just think these kids deserve to be given more credit than just calling them overachievers imho The kool aide is strong with this one. Get over it, we don't have very good forwards. It's just how it is. They get the job done but rely on strong defense and there's no way around that. They just don't score very much. Quote
geaux_sioux Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 You are seriously overestimating this team. They are definitely overachieving. Gothberg is probably better than Dell was but not head and shoulders better. He is a good not great goalie that seems to have really limited his biggest weakness (super soft goals), but they do still appear every now and then, including the greatest game of his life against Ferris. For our forwards. Pattyn, Gaarder, Rodwell, St. Clair, Chyzyk, and Panzarella would have never seen the ice on the Pony Express team. Parks would have been playing with Mario. Again, probably the second best forward we have on our team this year would have been a fourth liner three years ago. I'm as excited for the frozen four as anyone but I think we should also call a spade a spade and this year's team is overachieving. And there is nothing wrong with being overachievers. Yale wasn't one of the four best teams in the country last year and they won it all. The gophers probably had the best team in the country last year and lost in the first round. That team had a first round pick on the fourth line...... Quote
UNDBIZ Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 I'm slightly buzzed boys If only we could all be more like gfhockey at 1:00 pm on a Tuesday! Quote
siouxnatty#8 Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 The kool aide is strong with this one. Get over it, we don't have very good forwards. It's just how it is. They get the job done but rely on strong defense and there's no way around that. They just don't score very much. thats just my opinion no kool aid intended Quote
Oxbow6 Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 from now on i will try to direct any future condescending comments to the rodents. Sorry oxbow No offense taken. I'm just trying to get back to FAR from PHX............. Quote
sprig Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 No offense taken. I'm just trying to get back to FAR from PHX............. exactly what happened at the Sawgrass 17th Quote
I Ranger Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 You are seriously overestimating this team. They are definitely overachieving. Gothberg is probably better than Dell was but not head and shoulders better. He is a good not great goalie that seems to have really limited his biggest weakness (super soft goals), but they do still appear every now and then, including the greatest game of his life against Ferris. For our forwards. Pattyn, Gaarder, Rodwell, St. Clair, Chyzyk, and Panzarella would have never seen the ice on the Pony Express team. Parks would have been playing with Mario. Again, probably the second best forward we have on our team this year would have been a fourth liner three years ago. I'm as excited for the frozen four as anyone but I think we should also call a spade a spade and this year's team is overachieving. And there is nothing wrong with being overachievers. Yale wasn't one of the four best teams in the country last year and they won it all. The gophers probably had the best team in the country last year and lost in the first round. I agree for the most part other than Rodwell was a regular in the lineup that year as a freshman playing with Mario and Rowney on the fourth line once the team was fully healthy. Quote
I Ranger Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 That team had a first round pick on the fourth line...... Actually third line. Kristo-Nelson-Davidson were the third line with Mario-Rowney-Rodwell the fourth. Quote
Oxbow6 Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 exactly what happened at the Sawgrass 17th Round one....pin back left. Pulled tee shot left. Disappeared. Was 1/3 way down walking path. Chip and 2 putt for bogey 4. Round 2...Pin middle right. 5'9" from hole and hit putt for birdie 2. Quote
siouxweet Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 why does it sound like there is a lot of apologizing going on for this team making the frozen four? the 2004 team didn't make it this far and I'm pretty sure most on here were devistated by that as that team was one of the best to take the ice in the last 10-15 years. maybe this makes up for that. this team may or may not win next thursday but have done more than I would have expected on Nov. 29. Quote
Popular Post Walsh Hall Posted April 1, 2014 Popular Post Posted April 1, 2014 Real mature and classy Ray77. And if people want to ignore me, that is fine. It just means they want all opinions to be like their own. I answer people's questions on this topic as best I can and all I get in response is name-calling, childish comments and people telling me to shut up. I don't think I am the one with the problem here. First, many people's opinions are just flat out wrong. I can say a Honda is a nicer car than a Porsche. It's my opinion, but my opinion is 100% wrong. It astonishes me how limited some folks' perspective is. To say Hak is anything but an elite coach is moronic. In many of the past seasons we are talking about literally a bounce or two from a national championship. It's just as nuts to say Hak's a great coach because we won this past weekend where we got a bounce, as to say he is inadequate because we lose a tournament game in a similar fashion. Look at the body of work. It speaks for itself. If we weren't competitive, weren't in the mix for league championships I would have a problem as well. To the folks that say Hak doesn't change from his system: I really don't understand this one. I haven't seen a game this year where the breakouts, forechecks, PP, etc. haven't been modified during the game. Doesn't mean that it works, but the system 100% changes. If you can't see that you have no business complaining. 7 Quote
sprig Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 Round one....pin back left. Pulled tee shot left. Disappeared. Was 1/3 way down walking path. Chip and 2 putt for bogey 4. Round 2...Pin middle right. 5'9" from hole and hit putt for birdie 2. no balls in the water, think I gave mm a guess of more than that, but not many more, since anyone who even attempts that hole is either a low handicapper or has a lifetime supply of balls Quote
Oxbow6 Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 no balls in the water No. But like every other amateur golfer I can spray it around as well. Quote
sprig Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 No. But like every other amateur golfer I can spray it around as well. would guess I could raise the water level by several feet Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.