Smoggy Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 You have to remember that number more than likely includes scholarship costs (and DU being private is not cheap). You can see the sports they sponsor here: http://www.denverpioneers.com/ DU isn't listed in here, http://www.usatoday....base/54955804/1 , because they are private. Forgot about the private thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 Really? you win a couple of games and that's proof of what? That you won a couple of games. You guys are so delusional - why don't you go win an important game and then we'll talk. After you guys couldn't take the success we had during our transition so you followed us into DI. Time to get off our coat tails and make a name for yourselves in the BSC. I won't hold my breath. Are you for real?? Holy crap. You win a National Title, and win a bunch of games in transition, and you think UND is riding your coat tails. You first rode the coat tails of SDSU because THEY got you in the conference you are in. Not the other way around. Then USD is riding SDSU's coat tails because they are in the same conference as both of you...so that leaves UND in a conference you guys tried to get into twice. We are riding the coat tails of no one. By the way Dan before these past couple seasons...what did NDSU do.....3-8? Lets see what UND can do after transition...do we ride NDSU's coat tails and go 6-5 and 3-8 in the first 2 seasons after transition or do we make the playoffs in the first two like SDSU did. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krangodance Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 62-45-3... This simple, fact based statistic should win the debate but, unfortunately, most people nowadays would prefer to engage in hyperbole than make a logical determination based on hard facts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoggy Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 Why are we having this argument....again? Too many trolls and too many Sioux fans sucked in. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMSioux Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 Really? you win a couple of games and that's proof of what? That you won a couple of games. You guys are so delusional - why don't you go win an important game and then we'll talk. After you guys couldn't take the success we had during our transition so you followed us into DI. Time to get off our coat tails and make a name for yourselves in the BSC. I won't hold my breath. Hey BD - this is a UND Fan Board on "Fan Boards" FANS of the team like to chat about "What ifs" and "What do you think about". We don't need a Troll Monitor to question every thing we post - sometimes it's just for fun because we are FANS of the team and school. Topics we post about are not always possible, probable or persuable - it's just for fun because we are FANS of the team/school. We don't need any big brother trolls to stop discussions. Geez you guys really can't get over us can you? Get counseling. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDColorado Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 This may be very hard to pull off but how about going forward we totally ignore the troll posts from certain NDSU fans; we all know who they are. So whenever these trolls post we simply carry on the conversation and pretend that the post never existed. This will be very tough but it seems that the only way we can get rid of them is by treating them like 5 year olds. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 i read a lot about this today (slow day at work) and if montana and msu are for it (which it sounds like they are the ones pushing for it) then I'm all for it.....it puts the WAC on a couple of years of life support (while um/msu decide once and for all what they want to do) and if it doesn't work then um, msu, psu, sac, and und go back to the big sky (prolly along with idaho) and the wac dies and the bsc is the third and last western fb conf in the west... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeauxSioux Posted July 24, 2012 Author Share Posted July 24, 2012 The ironic thing is that baseball (a sport that I have advocated dumping) may be the thing that puts UND ahead of some of the other schools for the WAC. The WAC needs baseball playing schools to survive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 not an expert on how many sports all these different schools need but yes that is funny that baseball could get us in....but if the wac needed one more sport some people were throwing around men's soccer? soccer? how about since denver already has lacrosse, why not lacrosse? probably just as cheap as soccer to start up but 1000 times more fun to watch!!!! sica?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 The WAC, if it doesn't sponsor football, which it wouldn't under this notion (Idaho would be FBS indy; other schools would play Big Sky FCS FB), has to play MBB and two other mens team sports. The options are baseball, hockey, lacrosse, soccer and I forget what else. (Tennis, golf, wrestling, track, CC, swimming, aren't team sports, but are considered individual sports.) So yes, I'm in GeauxSioux's boat: Baseball, which I've advocated dropping in favor of lacrosse, could work to UND's advantage in this situation because the WAC is close to having enough baseball playing members. Maybe there is a good reason why they invested in Kraft Field. The other thing I know: If Montana or Montana State foster FBS dreams they need to add two sports each. It's 14 sports to be DI (FCS); it's 16 sports to be FBS. The Montana schools are both at 14. Wouldn't it be a kick if they decided on lacrosse with Denver playing it already. The UND would probably have to relook at its mens sports alignment. (Correction: Montana is adding softball so they'll be at 15; MSU is at 15 as they sponsor womens skiing.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 Isn't UND an affiliate member of the WAC in swimming? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeauxSioux Posted July 24, 2012 Author Share Posted July 24, 2012 Isn't UND an affiliate member of the WAC in swimming? Yes. Women's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 Isn't UND an affiliate member of the WAC in swimming? {DING!} You are correct, sir. Note the school of athlete number three of the four: http://www.wacsports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=45926&SPID=4116&DB_LANG=C&ATCLID=205429834&DB_OEM_ID=10100 Here's the WAC WIki page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Athletic_Conference#Affiliate_members Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farce poobah Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 ... The Montana schools are both at 14. Wouldn't it be a kick if they decided on lacrosse with Denver playing it already. The UND would probably have to relook at its mens sports alignment. (Correction: Montana is adding softball so they'll be at 15; MSU is at 15 as they sponsor womens skiing.) While lacrosse is more realistic, wouldn't it be a kick if Montana(s) added hockey? (Really, why else would they want to invite UND into the club?) After all, the NCHC footprint doesn't extend that far northwest yet ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 The Montanas wanted UND because UND looks like them academically and athletically, and has many of the same long-range goals and aspirations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmksioux Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 This article is from last week, but there are still some interesting quotes. The article is an interview with Jacksonville St. Head Football Coach. http://www.examiner.com/article/college-football-jacksonville-state-may-be-headed-to-the-wac He seems to think the WAC is going to be adding some FCS schools. It looks like there will be five or six FCS schools that are going to be pulled into the bottom of the WAC The WAC is holding their football media day this Thursday. It will be interesting to see if anymore news comes from that. Also, the interim WAC Commissioner has been quoted as saying the WAC had 30 days to make some decisions. The interview he stated it in was in the first week of July. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmksioux Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Since Star isn't posting here anymore, I will share a couple of his recent posts from other message boards. I have no idea if he is connected or has reliable sources, but it is fun to read and speculate. Here a re couple of links to where Star..er I mean "Siouxfan" is posting: http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=451&f=2368&t=9153461 http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=451&f=2368&t=9158548&p=2 From sources that I can not reveal, there are four Big Sky schools Presidents that are very tightly knit and are planning "bigger things": Montana's Engstrom Montana State's Cruzado Portland State's Weiwel North Dakota Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDershirt Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Interesting read on UM situation in regards Penn State... http://missoulian.com/news/local/article_c2f89422-d534-11e1-815a-001a4bcf887a.html#.UA4Qzqaoblk.twitter probably fits here due to the potential implications on the conferences... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeauxSioux Posted July 25, 2012 Author Share Posted July 25, 2012 This article is from last week, but there are still some interesting quotes. The article is an interview with Jacksonville St. Head Football Coach. http://www.examiner....aded-to-the-wac He seems to think the WAC is going to be adding some FCS schools. The WAC is holding their football media day this Thursday. It will be interesting to see if anymore news comes from that. Also, the interim WAC Commissioner has been quoted as saying the WAC had 30 days to make some decisions. The interview he stated it in was in the first week of July. And people say UND is an outlier.... An Alabama school in the WAC? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WILDCAT Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Not sure I like the idea, I have a feeling Weber would be separated from the other origional Big Sky schools they have been playing for over 50 years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeauxSioux Posted July 25, 2012 Author Share Posted July 25, 2012 Brian Murhpy from the Idaho Statesman... Idaho and New Mexico State have been told they will not be members of the Mountain West. "Go on to Plan B" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teeder11 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Brian Murhpy from the Idaho Statesman... Wow.... just wow! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 If you weren't familiar with what a "junk-punch" would feel like, ask the athletic departments in Las Cruses and Moscow. As of about two hours ago they're familiar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmksioux Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Here's another interview with Big Sky Commissioner Doug Fullerton. Nothing too earth shattering, but it's still an interesting read. It's nice to see that the Big Sky appears to have a strategic plan in place and is carrying it out. http://www.deseretnews.com/article/765592003/Big-Sky-is-isle-of-calm-in-sea-of-grid-turmoil.html?pg=all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 More about the MWC shunning Idaho and NMSU. http://voices.idahostatesman.com/2012/07/25/bmurphy/mountain_west_rules_out_adding_idaho_new_mexico_state_again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.