Johnny Five Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Not that it would solve all issues regarding NCAA football, but wouldn't it be nice if coaching hires and the transfer portal was froze until after the final buzzer.... 2 Quote
NDRA Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Johnny Five said: Not that it would solve all issues regarding NCAA football, but wouldn't it be nice if coaching hires and the transfer portal was froze until after the final buzzer.... I don't think the portal is open yet, but players can announce their intention at any time. Quote
sioux24/7 Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago Probably prefer them to announce now rather than late in the process. Although, announcing now also makes it seem like minds could have been elsewhere as the season went on. Quote
Shawn-O Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 25 minutes ago, Johnny Five said: Not that it would solve all issues regarding NCAA football, but wouldn't it be nice if coaching hires and the transfer portal was froze until after the final buzzer.... Get rid of conference championship games, install play in games, move Army-Navy to week zero, and wrap the thing up by New Years. Quote
shep Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 1 hour ago, forksandspoons said: That one is a bit puzzling. Guess he’s a find a new team every year type of guy. Also, I thought he had 3 years of eligibility left when he came here? Maybe he saw the Beavers and took the jump Quote
NDRA Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 23 minutes ago, shep said: Maybe he saw the Beavers and took the jump No doubt, the thought of 2 true Freshman would most certainly cause that. Quote
CMSioux Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago It used to bother me because I felt that they were betraying their teammates, coaches, the support staff that helped them with logistics and academics and The Flagship, now I'm numb to it, which is probably a good thing. Quote
Siouxperman8 Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 3 minutes ago, CMSioux said: It used to bother me because I felt that they were betraying their teammates, coaches, the support staff that helped them with logistics and academics and The Flagship, now I'm numb to it, which is probably a good thing. Unfortunately I’m still in stage 1 and it still bothers me. 3 Quote
geaux_sioux Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 34 minutes ago, Siouxperman8 said: Unfortunately I’m still in stage 1 and it still bothers me. I’d rather have the guys here who really really want to. They’ll perform better when it matters. 3 Quote
The Sicatoka Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago It's a new reality. Focus on needs, and they may change unexpectedly; do not fret on the rest. Quote
UND-FB-FAN Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 11 hours ago, geaux_sioux said: I’d rather have the guys here who really really want to. They’ll perform better when it matters. Does that include the offensive coordinator? He seems to have a fascination with the Big 10 and NFL. Perhaps UND just ain’t doing it for him … 1 Quote
geaux_sioux Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 minutes ago, UND-FB-FAN said: Does that include the offensive coordinator? He seems to have a fascination with the Big 10 and NFL. Perhaps UND just ain’t doing it for him … If he didn’t really wanna be here Schmidt would have him out on his ass 1 1 Quote
AJS Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago I'll never fault the players. Continuously frustrated with the effort to fundraise for the collectives (both 701 & 1883). A few years ago when NDSU started their collective they called an emergency meeting with donors, coaches, players. This year, they raised over $600K in a day during their very public day of giving / collective push. Currently have over $2 million. UND is not even close. Two different leagues. So little effort put in from UND side. Will NDSU lose guys? Yes. Let's count impact players that portal out between the Dakota schools and see where UND finishes. Retention (IMO) is the most important step. Currently: UND - 2 SDSU - 1 NDSU - 0 1 Quote
forksandspoons Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 minutes ago, AJS said: I'll never fault the players. Continuously frustrated with the effort to fundraise for the collectives (both 701 & 1883). A few years ago when NDSU started their collective they called an emergency meeting with donors, coaches, players. This year, they raised over $600K in a day during their very public day of giving / collective push. Currently have over $2 million. UND is not even close. Two different leagues. So little effort put in from UND side. Will NDSU lose guys? Yes. Let's count impact players that portal out between the Dakota schools and see where UND finishes. Retention (IMO) is the most important step. Currently: UND - 2 SDSU - 1 NDSU - 0 100 percent spot on. Quote
CMSioux Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 21 minutes ago, AJS said: I'll never fault the players. Continuously frustrated with the effort to fundraise for the collectives (both 701 & 1883). A few years ago when NDSU started their collective they called an emergency meeting with donors, coaches, players. This year, they raised over $600K in a day during their very public day of giving / collective push. Currently have over $2 million. UND is not even close. Two different leagues. So little effort put in from UND side. Will NDSU lose guys? Yes. Let's count impact players that portal out between the Dakota schools and see where UND finishes. Retention (IMO) is the most important step. Currently: UND - 2 SDSU - 1 NDSU - 0 SU has also done a good job of getting non graduates to join TMs. Part of that is many farmers see SU as their university of choice. IMO they also put much more money/effort into promoting TM compared to CC. But again the ag community sees SU as theirs. 1 Quote
UND-FB-FAN Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 17 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said: If he didn’t really wanna be here Schmidt would have him out on his ass People with their intentions can be subtle … and the proof is in the pudding (2025 wasn’t a good ending for it) time will tell Quote
UND-FB-FAN Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 15 minutes ago, AJS said: I'll never fault the players. Continuously frustrated with the effort to fundraise for the collectives (both 701 & 1883). A few years ago when NDSU started their collective they called an emergency meeting with donors, coaches, players. This year, they raised over $600K in a day during their very public day of giving / collective push. Currently have over $2 million. UND is not even close. Two different leagues. So little effort put in from UND side. Will NDSU lose guys? Yes. Let's count impact players that portal out between the Dakota schools and see where UND finishes. Retention (IMO) is the most important step. Currently: UND - 2 SDSU - 1 NDSU - 0 Agreed. More can always be done. And I whole heartedly agree with not blaming or faulting the players. The experienced adults in the room (coaches, athletic director, administration, alumni/fans/boosters) are the ones who rightfully deserve the (hopefully constructive) criticism. 1 Quote
gfhockey Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago NSU hits the whole state hard. It seems like the und brass boy hits grand forks minto and Oslo Quote
Siouxperman8 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago It’s hard for me to pretend that we can keep our players if FBS schools really want them. Minimum $3M for a middling program like MN to retain 3 players. Can’t believe this is sustainable in long run. Quote
AJS Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago @Siouxperman8 certain players, no doubt. It's why NDSU with 2 million + to play with won't be able to keep everyone. Hypothetically, losing high-end / key contributors over 50/60k is tough. I would think the two guys that have entered so far, won't be getting 6 figures. Hoping for the best. Not a great start so far. Few quiet days and things will look better. Quote
GoHawks Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 13 hours ago, forksandspoons said: Has offers from South Carolina, Tarleton, Hawaii, Maryland, UTEP, and many others. Quote
gfhockey Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 12 minutes ago, AJS said: @Siouxperman8 certain players, no doubt. It's why NDSU with 2 million + to play with won't be able to keep everyone. Hypothetically, losing high-end / key contributors over 50/60k is tough. I would think the two guys that have entered so far, won't be getting 6 figures. Hoping for the best. Not a great start so far. Few quiet days and things will look better. Look at msu they got a 300m donation for their nil endowmney Quote
The Sicatoka Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago @Siouxperman8, it's not sustainable except at the very highest levels. Quote
JacksonW Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 45 minutes ago, gfhockey said: NSU hits the whole state hard. It seems like the und brass boy hits grand forks minto and Oslo NDSU is primarily for students who plan on staying in region.UND is for students who plan on taking their talents everywhere. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.