SIOUXELEVENS Posted December 1 Posted December 1 If Berry leaves on his own or gets axed who would be the best choice to replace him? I think we need a young aggressive coach who need to plays a different style. 1 Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted December 1 Posted December 1 This cannot be allowed to go on until we are back to 1993-94 territory. 2 Quote
Popular Post brianvf Posted December 1 Popular Post Posted December 1 When Karl was added to the staff, I thought he was going to be the heir apparent to the Berry throne. But I'm not sure if Karl would be the best choice to motivate the players...would it just be more of the same that we're seeing now? I know others have mentioned wanting to go outside the UND family, which I'd be fine with if the candidate is right. Just look at Blais. But if they stick with UND pedigree, I think that Matt Smaby could be a contender. He's only 40 and has been named the head coach for US WJAC on top of his USHL coaching. Could be a Carle-like pipeline for the kids that play on that team. 6 Quote
SIOUXELEVENS Posted December 1 Author Posted December 1 Smaby or St. Claire or outside the UND family Quote
UNDhoops Posted December 1 Posted December 1 I know I’m pretty much done watching until there is a new coach. If they make the tournament I’ll watch then but other than that who cares. They look like they do not care at all. Quote
tnt Posted December 1 Posted December 1 How about Garrett Raboin. Better record than us in year 2, and his teams actually have a work ethic culture. 3 Quote
Bleedn Green Posted December 1 Posted December 1 The coach's job is to get players to play to their maximum potential and to put players in a position for success. I see no drive! no sense of urgency! They are just going through the motions. I can't believe the coaching staff is not embarrassed of the product they are putting on the ice. Quote
SIOUXELEVENS Posted December 1 Author Posted December 1 Berry was proud of their effort tonight , WTF! 2 Quote
Pump It Up Posted December 1 Posted December 1 5 minutes ago, tnt said: How about Garrett Raboin. Better record than us in year 2, and his teams actually have a work ethic culture. I was just going to come here to post this. He’d be perfect. Quote
SIOUXELEVENS Posted December 1 Author Posted December 1 5 minutes ago, tnt said: How about Garrett Raboin. Better record than us in year 2, and his teams actually have a work ethic culture. Raboin would be a good one. Quote
tnt Posted December 1 Posted December 1 All I know is that Minnesota held on to Don Lucia to the point where they couldn’t beat another team in Minnesota, and now they look on pace to being in contention for a title for the 5th straight year. 3 Quote
Pump It Up Posted December 1 Posted December 1 Raboin is fascinating to me because he’s a straight winner, young guy, from Detroit Lakes. He could be to UND what Carle is to Denver. I'd prefer SCSU lock him up to a lifetime contract but Larson has been too good to move on from. Quote
Big A HG Posted December 1 Posted December 1 Nick Saban. Most of this team's flaws he can fix without knowing a thing about hockey. 1 1 Quote
UNDhoops Posted December 1 Posted December 1 17 minutes ago, Bleedn Green said: The coach's job is to get players to play to their maximum potential and to put players in a position for success. I see no drive! no sense of urgency! They are just going through the motions. I can't believe the coaching staff is not embarrassed of the product they are putting on the ice. Berry doesn’t need to care considering he can miss the tournament and they’ll still bring him back. Quote
SIOUXELEVENS Posted December 1 Author Posted December 1 At the end of the day it comes down to wins and losses #culture 1 1 Quote
siouxweet Posted December 1 Posted December 1 Unfortunately we can have this conversation all year long but as long as Chaves is the AD Berry isn't going anywhere until his contract is up. Quote
sioux rube Posted December 1 Posted December 1 5 minutes ago, siouxweet said: Unfortunately we can have this conversation all year long but as long as Chaves is the AD Berry isn't going anywhere until his contract is up. Sadly you are correct Quote
SIOUXELEVENS Posted December 1 Author Posted December 1 If Berry cares so much for the program then he shouldn’t run it into the ground before making a change Quote
Brett0909 Posted December 1 Posted December 1 16 hours ago, tnt said: All I know is that Minnesota held on to Don Lucia to the point where they couldn’t beat another team in Minnesota, and now they look on pace to being in contention for a title for the 5th straight year. This. Every team in similar coaching situations needing to decide if occasional flashes or selective success are good enough, ultimately comes out stronger when they finally cut the anchor/HC. You can wait forever hoping for a different outcome, or just do the hard part of the business and make the call before it’s too late. Lucia, Berenson, York, etc. All major teams with HCs who had historical success that kept them around past their time to move on (more success than Berry). And that’s not counting teams like DU who lose a top tier coach like Monty and still uplevel after. UND athletics continues to have no urgency and cater to local politics, and it shows across the board with every sport having year after year of disappointment. Hockey lasted longer than most and deflected attention away from the even bigger issues in every other sport, but is sliding into mediocrity. Seriously, 1 win in the playoffs after his rookie season and now being outclassed by RMU and BSU with what should be a stacked team (minus injury issues). ?!?! It’s embarrassing to say the least. And for anyone who needs to hear it, this isn’t a recent overreaction. I didn’t like the hire, hoped I was wrong after his first year, and have been underwhelmed every year since. But he seems to have completely lost control at this point. 2 Quote
tnt Posted December 1 Posted December 1 12 minutes ago, Brett0909 said: This. Every team in similar coaching situations needing to decide if occasional flashes or selective success are good enough, ultimately comes out stronger when they finally cut the anchor/HC. You can wait forever hoping for a different outcome, or just do the hard part of the business and make the call before it’s too late. Lucia, Berenson, York, etc. All major teams with HCs who had historical success that kept them around past their time to move on (more success than Berry). And that’s not counting teams like DU who lose a top tier coach like Monty and still uplevel after. UND athletics continues to have no urgency and cater to local politics, and it shows across the board with every sport having year after year of disappointment. Hockey lasted longer than most and deflected attention away from the even bigger issues in every other sport, but is sliding into mediocrity. Seriously, 1 win in the playoffs after his rookie season and now being outclassed by RMU and BU with what should be a stacked team (minus injury issues). ?!?! It’s embarrassing to say the least. And for anyone who needs to hear it, this isn’t a recent overreaction. I didn’t like the hire, hoped I was wrong after his first year, and have been underwhelmed every year since. But he seems to have completely lost control at this point. Hopefully they can still turn around this season, but if they don’t, after the championship year they will have made the tourney 5 times with a single win against AIC, and missed the tourney 4 times. (Giving credit for a tourney in Covid year). A little better than 50% wouldn’t be horrible if you took advantage a few times. Not making that run has opened up the recruiting of top players to numerous more teams. Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted December 1 Posted December 1 34 minutes ago, siouxweet said: Unfortunately we can have this conversation all year long but as long as Chaves is the AD Berry isn't going anywhere until his contract is up. That's what was being said about Bubba until this afternoon. Quote
Big A HG Posted December 1 Posted December 1 NCAA Tourney wins each year since it was a 16 team field. 1 Quote
MafiaMan Posted December 1 Posted December 1 19 minutes ago, Big A HG said: NCAA Tourney wins each year since it was a 16 team field. But I was told “parity” was the reason for this. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.