Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
15 minutes ago, Midwestern Hawk said:

He was.  OMG...that is even more pathetic then.  Reminds me of the fumbled trick play at Missouri State in 2021...

 

Maybe Belquist was supposed to catch it after being deflected off the hands of #67?

#67 had no idea what he was doing.  You cannot tell me he was leaking out as a receiver.  

Posted
3 minutes ago, UND1983 said:

#67 had no idea what he was doing.  You cannot tell me he was leaking out as a receiver.  

watch it again.. he was basically the TE.. he blocked down and then went out as a receiver.. Im not a great football mind so its possible Im wrong, but I think he was eligible.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, UND1983 said:

#67 had no idea what he was doing.  You cannot tell me he was leaking out as a receiver.  

He would have had to report(#), but he was technically eligible as last player on the LOS.  Correct?

Posted

Simon was 19-24 with bad drops and they took him off the field for the biggest play of the year on the road outside and at night and had a te throw his first pass of the year after blocking all game. Am I missing anything?

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Not sure how many times it was practiced but

A: 67 was not any option, because he reacted like a guy who never caught a pass in his life

B: if practiced it was probably half @ss because Q reacted like WTF do I do now since they were on him within 2 seconds. 

Posted
1 minute ago, geaux_sioux said:

Simon was 19-24 with bad drops and they took him off the field for the biggest play of the year on the road outside and at night and had a te throw his first pass of the year after blocking all game. Am I missing anything?

You covered it...Classic Bubba...

Posted
1 minute ago, UND Football Fan said:

Not sure how many times it was practiced but

A: 67 was not any option, because he reacted like a guy who never caught a pass in his life

B: if practiced it was probably half @ss because Q reacted like WTF do I do now since they were on him within 2 seconds. 

#67 would have caught 2 out of 10 tries...

Posted
9 minutes ago, wheelsup said:

watch it again.. he was basically the TE.. he blocked down and then went out as a receiver.. Im not a great football mind so its possible Im wrong, but I think he was eligible.

That’s fine but watch him.  He looks like he has no idea what planet he is on.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

This sucks and because of the extension Bubba is back next year. Promoting Schwenzfeier was a bad move at the time and is looking even worse that previously imagined. That may be the worse UND football defensive performance of all time considering how bad Youngstown is. 
 

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said:

Simon was 19-24 with bad drops and they took him off the field for the biggest play of the year on the road outside and at night and had a te throw his first pass of the year after blocking all game. Am I missing anything?

Watching that play again...on some level its hysterical and indicative of Bubba's reign at UND...2 point play for the win...a TE throwing a pass to an offensive lineman...and he wonders why it was not complete?

  • Upvote 1
Posted
11 hours ago, UND1983 said:

The stupid griddy dance that everyone thinks is so cool even though it’s been done to death, is the same as the program itself - stale, never-changing, uninspiring.  

Nothing about Bubba screams inspiration.  Think of it, the only time his team looked truly inspired was against the Bison last year as a result of a Dale Lennon speech.  

  • Upvote 2
Posted
32 minutes ago, Midwestern Hawk said:

Watching that play again...on some level its hysterical and indicative of Bubba's reign at UND...2 point play for the win...a TE throwing a pass to an offensive lineman...and he wonders why it was not complete?

An sdsu guy debunked this on Twitter, no linemen are eligible in college football.  Who was Q trying to throw to?

Posted
15 minutes ago, UND1983 said:

An sdsu guy debunked this on Twitter, no linemen are eligible in college football.  Who was Q trying to throw to?

He was lined up as the TE.. not left tackle. And he clearly went out for a pass. whether he reported or not I have no idea.. he is either the most lost OL player in history or an actual eligible receiver. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, wheelsup said:

He was lined up as the TE.. not left tackle. And he clearly went out for a pass. whether he reported or not I have no idea.. he is either the most lost OL player in history or an actual eligible receiver. 

He was the left tackle on end of the line

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted

Not a rules expert, but this is the wikipedia explanation:

College football

NCAA rules are less permissive than NFL rules and require that the five interior linemen, numbered 50 through 79, never line up as eligible receivers.[10] If an offensive tackle wishes to line up as a tackle-eligible, he must physically change his jersey number to that of an eligible receiver (this, for example, happened in the 2015 Cotton Bowl, when an offensive lineman for Baylor switched from his usual number of 60 to 80 in order to perform the feat).[11] A defensive lineman can line up as a tight end if his number is not between 50 and 79, as defensive players have no positional numbering restrictions in the NCAA. [citation needed]

Posted

I don’t blame Q for the play

blame the coaches for putting him in that situation

another time he was (n there and they called time out Q was giving someone hell on the sideline for lining up wrong, good for him 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, wheelsup said:

He was lined up as the TE.. not left tackle. And he clearly went out for a pass. whether he reported or not I have no idea.. he is either the most lost OL player in history or an actual eligible receiver. 

He looks lined up as the left tackle here to me.

#62 C, #73 LG

Now I’m curious what the play call was. He blocks down and climbs to the second level like he was run blocking. Maybe it was some sort of RPO. 
My guess is this was a designed run that was supposed hit the left side. Right Guard pulls and the running back blocks left. That makes sense with how the left tackle blocked. I think the QB saw the play blown up and panicked so he just threw it up. This looks like a designed run play to me.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Siouxperfan7 said:

Watch Ziebarth's 3 TD's.  He is basically untouched for all 3 of them.  A run play like that would have been a far better call for the 2 point conversion.  

Except it didn’t work on a 3rd and 2 that would have nearly iced the game earlier. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, Bison06 said:

He looks lined up as the left tackle here to me.

#62 C, #73 LG

Now I’m curious what the play call was. He blocks down and climbs to the second level like he was run blocking. Maybe it was some sort of RPO. 
My guess is this was a designed run that was supposed hit the left side. Right Guard pulls and the running back blocks left. That makes sense with how the left tackle blocked. I think the QB saw the play blown up and panicked so he just threw it up. This looks like a designed run play to me.

It’s a designed run and if 51 blocks the LB scraping Q walks in.  His throw was him panicking and trying to make something out of nothing. 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
15 hours ago, Kab said:

Could foresee a 4 game losing streak here 

ISU bad team winnable game, both South Dakota schools good but don't look like world beaters plus both games at the Alerus then Illinois State another bad team.  2-2 the rest of the way.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...