Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
37 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

She's a great addition to the broadcast team, never misses a beat and helps cover others' slip ups. Wonder if she has mixed feelings about working UND games after getting her start at Jan Brady.

Yeah, I think she's done a good job. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said:

It’s like you didn’t even read my post, impressive 

I might have misunderstood you, but it wasn't a sweep. UND won the shootout, not the 3v3 OT. 

 

chrome-capture-2023-10-30.png

Posted
3 minutes ago, Goon said:

I might have misunderstood you, but it wasn't a sweep. UND won the shootout, not the 3v3 OT. 

 

chrome-capture-2023-10-30.png

You missed the point. UND won in 3 on 3. Now, in the year 2023, 3 on 3 wins are considered actual wins. So if today’s rules were in effect back in 2019, it would have been a sweep.

  • Upvote 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, siouxforce19 said:

You missed the point. UND won in 3 on 3. Now, in the year 2023, 3 on 3 wins are considered actual wins. So if today’s rules were in effect back in 2019, it would have been a sweep.

UND did NOT win in the 3 on 3. It went to a shootout so the game is officially a tie whether it’s 2019 or 2023. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, rochsioux said:

UND did NOT win in the 3 on 3. It went to a shootout so the game is officially a tie whether it’s 2019 or 2023. 

Colton Poolman had the game winner in 3 on 3. It did not go to a shootout. Not sure where you got that from. 

IMG_3550.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
6 hours ago, siouxforce19 said:

Colton Poolman had the game winner in 3 on 3. It did not go to a shootout. Not sure where you got that from. 

IMG_3550.jpeg

I mean I was at the series so I hope I’d remember haha that was a lovely OT goal by Colton and there were a lot of happy Sioux fans in Downtown Denver that night

Posted
6 hours ago, siouxforce19 said:

Colton Poolman had the game winner in 3 on 3. It did not go to a shootout. Not sure where you got that from. 

IMG_3550.jpeg

My bad. I got that from a box score on this site that showed no goals scored in OT. What the box score didn’t show was the 3x3 OT. I forgot that In 2019 they were still playing a 5x5 OT first then 3x3 (I still prefer that format). 
Whether you count a 3x3 OT win as a win (2023) or tie (2019) in your W/L record, you still get the same number of conference points. When is the last time UND swept all the conference points in Denver? 

Posted
1 hour ago, rochsioux said:

My bad. I got that from a box score on this site that showed no goals scored in OT. What the box score didn’t show was the 3x3 OT. I forgot that In 2019 they were still playing a 5x5 OT first then 3x3 (I still prefer that format). 
Whether you count a 3x3 OT win as a win (2023) or tie (2019) in your W/L record, you still get the same number of conference points. When is the last time UND swept all the conference points in Denver? 

78 B.C. - Julius Caesar was the Sioux captain. Debating an inconsequential event 4 years gone by…

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
11 hours ago, siouxforce19 said:

You missed the point. UND won in 3 on 3. Now, in the year 2023, 3 on 3 wins are considered actual wins. So if today’s rules were in effect back in 2019, it would have been a sweep.

Well, I guess that's the standard now. They count 65% for a 3v3 OT win. Why not, right? The NHL does. I'd like to see a regulation sweep for the green team. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
4 hours ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said:

I mean I was at the series so I hope I’d remember haha that was a lovely OT goal by Colton and there were a lot of happy Sioux fans in Downtown Denver that night

Just because you were there, doesn't mean you'd remember it :D

  • Upvote 1
Posted
2 hours ago, BusinessSiouxt said:

78 B.C. - Julius Caesar was the Sioux captain. Debating an inconsequential event 4 years gone by…

 

18 minutes ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said:

You new here?

Beat me to it. Was gonna say.... yep, that's kind of what we do lol.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

20 years.. sounds like we're due. I say we sweep. I am also digging the 8pm start time.. kids will be in bed for the whole thing!

I talked so much !@#$ to DU when they were at the Canad a year or two ago... the sweep is needed so I can do it again In January.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
Just now, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

I can't bet college sports in my state, but I'd bet the under at O/U 7. Luddy wants some revenge after he got pulled in Magness for his last game with Miami.

Ohhhhhhhhhhh you cannnn

Posted
2 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

I can't bet college sports in my state, but I'd bet the under at O/U 7. Luddy wants some revenge after he got pulled in Magness for his last game with Miami.

Looks like the odds on where I go are Denver -170, ND +130. Denver favored...

Posted
5 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

Forcing me to use workarounds does me a favor. The ease with which people can wager on sports these days enables self destructive habits to do their thing.

You're not wrong.

Posted

Man, I would LOVE a sweep against DU. I just don't see that happening. Not that it couldn't: We are good enough team-wise. I just think that DU is still a good team (even sans Chrona). Plus I think our team looked a little sick last week. Thinking more of a split for the weekend. Would love to be proven wrong.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...