Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

2020 Dumpster Fire (Enter at your own risk)

jk

By jk
in Community

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 23.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Hayduke1

    1804

  • Oxbow6

    1786

  • BarnWinterSportsEngelstad

    1135

  • The Sicatoka

    1072

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Yote 53
Yote 53

The only people who need to be tested are health care workers, the elderly, and those with underlying health conditions.  If you are young (under 50) and healthy and are taking up a test kit, crowding

Oxbow6
Oxbow6

This country is being bright to its knees by fear....not the virus. Recovery from getting the virus is a couple weeks. Recovery of society from this hysteria will be years.

Siouxphan27
Siouxphan27

It’s sad that about half the country still believes outlets like msnbc and cnn.  You would think after they lied everyday for 3 years about Russian collusion, people would get the hint of what their t

Posted Images

Goon Veteran

Goon

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, UNDBIZ said:

It actually came from Vanity Fair, who got it from a book written by a CNN reporter.

Was it Trump’s favorite reporter? You know, #fakenewsCNN Jimmy Acosta...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Oxbow6 Grand Master

Oxbow6

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, BarnWinterSportsEngelstad said:

Trump administration moves to exempt teachers from quarantine requirements
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/trump-administration-moves-to-exempt-teachers-from-quarantine-requirements/ar-BB18cbQp?ocid=msedgdhp

teachers "critical infrastructure workers,"

At least classify them as essential  workers as those working in liquor stores.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Oxbow6 Grand Master

Oxbow6

Posted
Posted

UND sends out email to students and families that there are seven positives cases tied to six Greek Chapters on campus. Who knew zero positives was the goal on campus??? 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BarnWinterSportsEngelstad Mentor

BarnWinterSportsEngelstad

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Oxbow6 said:

UND sends out email to students and families that there are seven positives cases tied to six Greek Chapters on campus. Who knew zero positives was the goal on campus??? 

This is a chalenging start.
The Frats and Sororities are going to have to come up with some survival plans? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sioux rube Grand Master

sioux rube

Posted
Posted

In the Rasmussen Poll, President Trump’s approval stood at 47% yesterday – but made an incredible four percentage point leap this morning to 51%. When I reached out to Rasmussen to confirm that the sampling for today’s poll wasn’t taken before the DNC began to air, they said the polling data was being accumulated as the DNC speeches were ongoing. In other words, it is likely that some people were being directly influenced by the DNC – albeit not in favor of any Democrats.

Obama also spoke last night and blasted Trump for not taking the presidency seriously – but Obama’s approval was two percentage points lower than Trump’s was at this exact same point in their respective presidencies

 

https://bongino.com/trump-approval-surges-during-dnc

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Goon Veteran

Goon

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, UNDBIZ said:

Brian Stelter.  It's all in the first couple lines after clicking the link.

That makes it worse, Stettler is a bigger clown than Acosta. 

 

57 minutes ago, UNDlaw80 said:

 

It's all a hoax!  Fake news!

 

Efte3mcUEAIVHDB?format=jpg&name=medium

 

Quote

 

 

Just keep telling yourself that. From the Detroit News: Opinion: Obamagate is not a conspiracy theory

Democrats and their allies, who like to pretend that President Barack Obama's only scandalous act was wearing a tan suit, are going spend the next few months gaslighting the public by focusing on the most feverish accusations against Obama. But the fact is that we already have more compelling evidence that the Obama administration engaged in misconduct than we ever did for opening the Russian-collusion investigation.

It is not conspiracy-mongering to note that the investigation into Donald Trump was predicated on an opposition-research document filled with fabulism and, most likely, Russian disinformation. We know the DOJ withheld contradictory evidence when it began spying on those in Trump's orbit. We have proof that many of the relevant FISA-warrant applications — almost every one of them, actually — were based on "fabricated" evidence or riddled with errors. We know that members of the Obama administration, who had no genuine role in counterintelligence operations, repeatedly unmasked Trump's allies. And we now know that, despite a dearth of evidence, the FBI railroaded Michael Flynn into a guilty plea so it could keep the investigation going.

What's more, the larger context only makes these facts more damning. By 2016, the Obama administration's intelligence community had normalized domestic spying. Obama's director of national intelligence, James Clapper, famously lied about snooping on American citizens to Congress. His CIA director, John Brennan, oversaw an agency that felt comfortable spying on the Senate, with at least five of his underlings breaking into congressional computer files. His attorney general, Eric Holder, invoked the Espionage Act to spy on a Fox News journalist, shopping his case to three judges until he found one who let him name the reporter as a co-conspirator. The Obama administration also spied on Associated Press reporters, which the news organization called a "massive and unprecedented intrusion." And though it's been long forgotten, Obama officials were caught monitoring the conversations of members of Congress who opposed the Iran nuclear deal.

What makes anyone believe these people wouldn't create a pretext to spy on the opposition party? If anyone does, they shouldn't, because, on top of everything else, we know that Barack Obama was keenly interested in the Russian-collusion investigation's progress.

In her very last hour in office, national security adviser Susan Rice wrote a self-preserving email to herself, noting that she'd attended a meeting with the president, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, FBI Director James Comey and Vice President Joe Biden in which Obama stressed that everything in the investigation should proceed "by the book."

 

Did high-ranking Obama administration officials not always conduct such investigations "by the book"? It is curious that they would need to be specifically instructed to do so. It is also curious that the outgoing national security adviser, 15 minutes after Trump had been sworn in as president, would need to mention this meeting.

None of this means that Obama committed some specific easily defined crime; he almost assuredly did not. His staff is another story. In a healthy media environment, though, the mounting evidence of wrongdoing would spark an outpouring of journalistic curiosity.

 

"But," you might ask, "why does it matter, anymore?" Well, for one thing, many of the same characters central to all this apparent malfeasance now want to retake power in Washington. Biden is the Democratic Party's presumptive presidential nominee. He's running as the heir to Obama's legacy, and he was at that meeting with Rice. He had denied even knowing anything about the FBI investigation into Flynn before being forced to correct himself after ABC's George Stephanopoulos pointed out that he was mentioned in Rice's email. It's completely legitimate to wonder what he knew about the investigation.

Skeptics like to point out that the Obama administration had no motive to engage in abuse because Democrats were sure they were going to win. Richard Nixon won 49 states in 1972. His cronies had no need to break into the DNC's offices and touch off Watergate. But as the FBI agents involved in the case noted, they wanted to have an "insurance policy" if the unthinkable happened.

In 2016, the unthinkable did happen, and we're still dealing with the fallout four years later. We don't know where this scandal will end up, but one doesn't have to be a conspiracy theorist to wonder.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Goon Veteran

Goon

Posted
Posted

Canvassers demand answers after 72% of Detroit's absentee ballot counts were off

Quote

 

Recorded ballot counts in 72% of Detroit's absentee voting precincts didn't match the number of ballots cast, spurring officials in Michigan's largest county to ask the state to investigate ahead of a pivotal presidential election.

Without an explanation from Detroit election workers for the mismatches, the Wayne County Board of Canvassers requested this week for Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson's office to examine the "training and processes" used in Detroit's Aug. 4 primary, which one official described as a "perfect storm" of challenges. The board is charged with certifying election results.

In 46% of all Detroit's precincts — absentee and Election Day — vote counts were out of balance, according to information presented Tuesday to the Wayne County Board of Canvassers. Specifically, the number of ballots tracked in precinct poll books did not match the number of ballots counted.

The situation could amplify the spotlight on absentee ballots in Michigan ahead of an election, for which record levels of mail-in voting is expected and President Donald Trump is already raising concerns about how votes will be handled.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hayduke1 Enthusiast

Hayduke1

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Goon said:

That makes it worse, Stettler 

 

 

And you think Yahoo News is fake news.

ROTFLMFAO

 

Goodness.  You really are lost in your little pool of cultists and the lies they believe.  Tying is "all together" here.

Thank goodness nobody considers you a credible journalist. 

LMFAO!!

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UND1983 Mentor

UND1983

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

I like truth and facts.

The cult likes to lap up the bile of lies. 20,000 + by Twitler...and counting. 

He's gonna have a hell of a time under oath in court. 

Lol

 

You think a former President is going under oath in court?  Tell me more....

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hayduke1 Enthusiast

Hayduke1

Posted
Posted

I guess Fox News staff feel they are stuck in your cult.

https://www.primetimer.com/item/Report-Sean-Hannity-has-told-colleagues-privately-that-he-thinks-Trump-is-quot-batsh-t-crazy-quot-ElSd1o

"Fox News staffers feel like their trapped in Trump's cult -- and that even Hannity, who has been dubbed Trump's "shadow chief of staff," isn't totally on board with the president. In fact, Stelter alleges that Hannity has been vaping to deal with Trump-related stress. "Hannity would tell you, off-off-off the record, that Trump is a batshit crazy person,” one of his associates said. Another friend concurred: “Hannity has said to me more than once, ‘he’s crazy.’”

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hayduke1 Enthusiast

Hayduke1

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, sioux rube said:

In the Rasmussen Poll, President Trump’s approval stood at 47% yesterday – but made an incredible four percentage point leap this morning to 51%. When I reached out to Rasmussen to confirm that the sampling for today’s poll wasn’t taken before the DNC began to air, they said the polling data was being accumulated as the DNC speeches were ongoing. In other words, it is likely that some people were being directly influenced by the DNC – albeit not in favor of any Democrats.

Obama also spoke last night and blasted Trump for not taking the presidency seriously – but Obama’s approval was two percentage points lower than Trump’s was at this exact same point in their respective presidencies

 

https://bongino.com/trump-approval-surges-during-dnc

 

Rasmussen ranks very low in accuracy.   Of course, there are polls that  tilt toward Democrats too.  They did get the margin right in 2016, showing Clinton by about 2%.

Quinnipiac seems to be the most accurate though. 

Rasmussen latest shows a 4 point lead for Biden

Quinnipiac from a month ago shows a Biden 15 pt. lead. 

I think it is somewhere in the middle.

https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/405965-pollster-rasmussen-research-has-a-pro-gop-bias

“I think they tend to be more along the partisan angle, leaning toward the Republicans ... the weight that they put toward partisan self-identification,” Newall said, referring to Rasmussen’s long-standing practice of adjusting its results by party identification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...