Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, GoHawks said:

Yes he was a true freshman. Think i seen that Craig Hailey said he would be eligible for a medical redshirt and have 3 more years at NAU.

Pretty certain he can use a regular redshirt.

Posted
7 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said:

Pretty certain he can use a regular redshirt.

He played in at least one game this year though, so wouldn't he need the medical RS?

Posted
17 minutes ago, GoHawks said:

Think i seen that Craig Hailey said he would be eligible for a medical redshirt and have 3 more years at NAU.

 

16 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said:

Pretty certain he can use a regular redshirt.

I saw that as well but I am pretty sure he'd need an exemption from the standard policy. He played in 4 games (36%), which is over the 30% threshold typically used. He definitely wouldn't be able to just "use" a regular redshirt since he played this year.

 

Quote

To be eligible for a medical hardship waiver, a student-athlete has to meet the following criteria:

  • The student-athlete must suffer the injury during one of their four seasons of college competition or during the senior year of high school.
  • The injury must be incapacitating. That means it must be a season-ending injury.
  • The injury must occur prior to the start of the second half of the season.
  • The student-athlete must not have competed in more than 30% of the season or three contests, whichever is greater.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, jdub27 said:

 

I saw that as well but I am pretty sure he'd need an exemption from the standard policy. He played in 4 games (36%), which is over the 30% threshold typically used. He definitely wouldn't be able to just "use" a regular redshirt since he played this year.

 

 

O ok. Ive heard that sometimes you can send it in to the NCAA and there are chances that they can still get a medical redshirt. Didnt bubba say that Clive might be able to get a medical redshirt even though he already had one in Arizona? Its all up to the NCAA maybe?

Posted
34 minutes ago, GoHawks said:

O ok. Ive heard that sometimes you can send it in to the NCAA and there are chances that they can still get a medical redshirt. Didnt bubba say that Clive might be able to get a medical redshirt even though he already had one in Arizona? Its all up to the NCAA maybe?

Not sure on the rules, but I believe Bubba said he had applied. Having Clive back for another season (hopefully a full/healthy season) would be incredible.

Posted
44 minutes ago, GoHawks said:

O ok. Ive heard that sometimes you can send it in to the NCAA and there are chances that they can still get a medical redshirt. Didnt bubba say that Clive might be able to get a medical redshirt even though he already had one in Arizona? Its all up to the NCAA maybe?

Clive would need a 6th year which is a little bit different and tougher to get than a typical medical hardship . I think he has a shot due to missing half the season last year and pretty much the whole season this year. Plus he didn't exactly play a ton down at AZ, though I'm not sure how much that part factors in. Obviously would be huge for UND returning everyone on the offense outside of Coe, Reed, Mathewson and Mollberg.

Posted

So who should we be pulling for this weekend in the EWU vs MT game.

1. MT wins, and UND wins out --- UND wins the Big Sky outright and the autobid.

2. EWU wins (and wins out), UND wins out --- UND likely jumps MT in the rankings (better playoff spot) BUT UND shares the Big Sky title and the auto big goes to EWU

I'm going to assume, we would prefer the second scenario, as UND would be in the playoffs autobid or not, but would get a better position if MT loses. There is still also hope that EWU stumbles against Cal Poly, though that is a whole different issue, because if Cal Poly beats EWU (in addition to MT and SDSU) they would likely have a better position that us heading into the playoffs. (Unless CP loses to Weber or UNC). And on and on it goes.

Thoughts?!?!

Posted
4 minutes ago, siouxfan512 said:

So who should we be pulling for this weekend in the EWU vs MT game.

1. MT wins, and UND wins out --- UND wins the Big Sky outright and the autobid.

2. EWU wins (and wins out), UND wins out --- UND likely jumps MT in the rankings (better playoff spot) BUT UND shares the Big Sky title and the auto big goes to EWU

I'm going to assume, we would prefer the second scenario, as UND would be in the playoffs autobid or not, but would get a better position if MT loses. There is still also hope that EWU stumbles against Cal Poly, though that is a whole different issue, because if Cal Poly beats EWU (in addition to MT and SDSU) they would likely have a better position that us heading into the playoffs. (Unless CP loses to Weber or UNC). And on and on it goes.

Thoughts?!?!

I'd rather see Montana lose this week. Otherwise even if we win out, and even if EWU loses a different game, we would likely wind up being seeded behind both EWU and Montana.   Outright, undefeated big sky champs, yet third highest seed.  I think I mentioned that scenario here a couple weeks ago. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Siouxphan27 said:

I'd rather see Montana lose this week. Otherwise even if we win out, and even if EWU loses a different game, we would likely wind up being seeded behind both EWU and Montana.   Outright, undefeated big sky champs, yet third highest seed.  I think I mentioned that scenario here a couple weeks ago. 

Makes sense to me. I don't see any way we overtake E. Wash unless they lose a few games they should, but overtaking MT this week is a definite possibility.

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...