UND-RedSox fan Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 My bad. I thought you were implying that you remembering it being before the semester. You were referring to the timing between the end of the semester and his announcement. Makes sense. I also think Jordan's situation was pretty unique being he was a first rounder and had a lot of options. Yeah. I think I was trying to convince myself that Jordan was thinking if he stuck around for another year then he could sign with whatever team he liked. Possibly the team he team he grew up cheering for that isn't too far from where he grew up and owns the rights to his brother haha Quote
Fetch Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 I'm just tired of the star players I think a team of Gaarders & Generals type players would have better odds of a Championship 1 2 Quote
stoneySIOUX Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 I'm just tired of the star players I think a team of Gaarders & Generals type players would have better odds of a Championship Next year's team would have NO odds of a championship without potential star players. No Boeser + no Wilkie + no Gersich + no Tomek = no chance .... Not having good players would only hinder us. 1 1 Quote
Csonked Out Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 I'm just tired of the star players I think a team of Gaarders & Generals type players would have better odds of a Championship Right........ Quote
The Sicatoka Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 Is there a link for that? Yup: http://www.almanac.com/ Folks aren't correlating Hitchcock's contract extension yesterday with this? Quote
siouxkid12 Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 Semester has been over for 2 weeks. Those announcements tend to be made immediately after the semester ends since they likely have had their mind made up for months. Zane's announcement seems to be a normal time frame, but Jordan's seems longer than normal. Maybe I'm just not remembering the time frame others used correctly. maybe he was seeing what the Blues were going to do with Hitchcock.... 2 Quote
scpa0305 Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 I'm just tired of the star players I think a team of Gaarders & Generals type players would have better odds of a Championship Never. Quote
siouxstudent Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 I'm just tired of the star players I think a team of Gaarders & Generals type players would have better odds of a Championship LOL What?, jump on the Niagara or Alabama Huntsville wagon then and let me know how that goes..... 1 Quote
stoneySIOUX Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 LOL What?, jump on the Niagara or Alabama Huntsville wagon then and let me know how that goes..... Seriously... I don't get it. Such a weird argument. Quote
siouxstudent Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 Seriously... I don't get it. Such a weird argument. Perhaps a joke? hard to tell on here when people are messing around, thats my guess Quote
Fetch Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 Did Yale Union or Providence have lots of star players 1 Quote
OshieRoll Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 It seems like people have turned their attention to blaming Toews/Oshie/Parise/Nelson/Schmaltz and so on for us not having a recent natty because Hak is no longer here. Pretty pathetic if you ask me. We have always had a good mix of stars and blue-collar guys. 2 1 Quote
Popular Post OshieRoll Posted May 29, 2015 Popular Post Posted May 29, 2015 Did Yale Union or Providence have lots of star players Yale has 1 national championship in 122 years. Is that really what you want? 5 Quote
tnt Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 I don't agree with Fetch on a team full of the Gaarder types, but it will be interesting to see if any of the young faces we have in the lineup, or some other underclassmen can have an impact down the stretch of the season like Gaarder did. Scoring goals during playoff hockey is a lot different than scoring during the regular season. Hopefully somebody steps up and keeps the ball rolling as a big game scorer. Quote
SiouxScore Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 I'm just tired of the star players I think a team of Gaarders & Generals type players would have better odds of a Championship Is this serious? If so sorry but that will never happen here and I'm very glad we will continue to attract top prospects. If you want a team full of just grinder type players and no stars you better look somewhere else. Quote
stoneySIOUX Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 Did Yale Union or Providence have lots of star players Lol no but you have any more examples? 3 total? That's it? BC had plenty, Wisconsin, DU, BU all did, too. Quote
siouxstudent Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 Lol no but you have any more examples? 3 total? That's it? BC had plenty, Wisconsin, DU, BU all did, too. I would say Prov had some pretty high end players, Gilles, Gilmour, Jankowski I can think of off hand. I also remember Union's Gostisbehere was in my book a Star player as well. Yale I'm not sure but Id still prefer the high end talent all day every day with a good mix of hard working grinders. 2 Quote
MoSiouxFan Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 Guys like Gaarder and Pattyn are gold and are a great mix with the top end talent. And in the case of those two, they were the heart and soul of our squad. Wish they both had a year left. BTW, did either of them get scholarship money their last year or two? Quote
stoneySIOUX Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 Guys like Gaarder and Pattyn are gold and are a great mix with the top end talent. And in the case of those two, they were the heart and soul of our squad. Wish they both had a year left. BTW, did either of them get scholarship money their last year or two? Absolutely. Both left as full scholarship players. Quote
MoSiouxFan Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 Absolutely. Both left as full scholarship players. Great. Was hoping so. Thanks. Quote
petey23 Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 Did Yale Union or Providence have lots of star playersby whose definition? Union had 2 of the best defensemen in the country and 1 of the best forward lines in the country.Providence had the guy coming into the year being lauded as the top goalie in the nation and they were preseason #4 or #5.Funny thing is that if the NCAA hadn't messed around with the pairings and locations their is about a 90% chance that Providence would have been 1 and done. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 by whose definition? Union had 2 of the best defensemen in the country and 1 of the best forward lines in the country. I believe Union's goalie was the Team USA goalie at the most recent Worlds (US: bronze). Meh ... no stars. Quote
burd Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 I'm just tired of the star players I think a team of Gaarders & Generals type players would have better odds of a Championship A team with Gaarders & Generals is surely a good thing, but it is a whole he!! of a lot different than a team of Gaarders and Generals. 3 Quote
The Sicatoka Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 A team full of grinders will lose as soon as they give up the second goal. You need a mix of skills. Quote
stoneySIOUX Posted May 29, 2015 Posted May 29, 2015 A team with Gaarders & Generals is surely a good thing, but it is a whole he!! of a lot different than a team of Gaarders and Generals. Exactly. We have those guys, too. St. Clair, Chyz, Gardner coming in at some point... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.