Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
29 minutes ago, CMSioux said:

One thing I find puzzling is the way offensive players seem to be in the plan one week and then ghosted. I realize Xavier is a fifth year guy but he came in with some strong credentials and seemed productive early on. Did I miss him getting hurt or is it the youth movement? There are others also.

Sounds like younger guys Brunell and Langama have finally caught up to X at practice and have been much better practice players and showing more. So sounds like X started hot and now guys have passed him, so he’s bottom of the chart.

Posted
1 hour ago, NCsiouxfan1733 said:

Sounds like younger guys Brunell and Langama have finally caught up to X at practice and have been much better practice players and showing more. So sounds like X started hot and now guys have passed him, so he’s bottom of the chart.

I’m assuming you heard this on the Tank and Kelly podcast interview with Ike, because I heard the exact same thing. 

Posted
1 hour ago, NCsiouxfan1733 said:

Sounds like younger guys Brunell and Langama have finally caught up to X at practice and have been much better practice players and showing more. So sounds like X started hot and now guys have passed him, so he’s bottom of the chart.

Got it another example of the MVFC having a higher level of talent I guess. 

Posted
17 hours ago, NCsiouxfan1733 said:

Sounds like younger guys Brunell and Langama have finally caught up to X at practice and have been much better practice players and showing more. So sounds like X started hot and now guys have passed him, so he’s bottom of the chart.

i would never used "hot" to describe x's production this year....

Posted
7 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

i would never used "hot" to describe x's production this year....

My take on him was he'd try to bounce a lot of stuff outside and couldn't shake the guy on the edge so not much success.  I think he did well catching the ball. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Siouxperman8 said:

My take on him was he'd try to bounce a lot of stuff outside and couldn't shake the guy on the edge so not much success.  I think he did well catching the ball. 

agreed...a little screen pass with the d line behind him instead of just check down passes would've bee nice...

but yeah...pitter pattered in the hole and sometimes tried to go wide and nothing happened(s)

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

agreed...a little screen pass with the d line behind him instead of just check down passes would've bee nice...

but yeah...pitter pattered in the hole and sometimes tried to go wide and nothing happened(s)

I made the comment at a game that he couldn't get the corner and about 2 plays later he went around the end for a long one.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Siouxperman8 said:

I made the comment at a game that he couldn't get the corner and about 2 plays later he went around the end for a long one.

a squirrel and a nut......haha

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, geaux_sioux said:

I just watched Indiana throw a back shoulder ball to a wr who had zero separation. It was as if they trusted he could make a play if they just throw it to him. It’s exactly what we should have done with Deng all year. He doesn’t need to run by guys because he can catch over them. Next year we need to figure that out.

You have mentioned one of about 10 deficiencies that this year’s offensive direction for UND entailed …. need adjustment/change on offense in order to take the next step. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...