SiouxFan100 Posted September 21 Author Posted September 21 I wonder how many receiving yards Bo would have if the ball got to him when open. Quote
SiouxFan100 Posted September 21 Author Posted September 21 San Diego looked like a decent team with some talented players Quote
SiouxFan100 Posted September 22 Author Posted September 22 Despite all we are 3-1. I’ll take it. So far exceeding expectations Quote
gfhockey Posted September 22 Posted September 22 1 hour ago, Oxbow6 said: Sawyer is so fun to watch. Great story too. Rydlell nil should give him $10k 2 Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted September 22 Posted September 22 48 minutes ago, SiouxFan100 said: San Diego looked like a decent team with some talented players Ask yourself this: Would San Diego have receivers running wide open down the field playing pitch and catch with the QB if they were in Fargo or Brookings? The answer to that question highlights the gulf that exists between UND and both xDSUs. Winning games like this handily should become the norm if we want to get our program to the level of the xDSUs. That being said, the defense is 1000% better than last year, the o-line is solid and the running game is fun to watch. There is definite potential for further growth and improvement as the season progresses. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted September 22 Posted September 22 Was bumpy to start but it’s … the 21st of September … party on … never was a cloudy day … 2 Quote
The Sicatoka Posted September 22 Posted September 22 2 hours ago, FSSD said: My gosh.... we really need to get the passing offense going.. we play the other Dakota schools we are going to get crushed. I hear you but just like ETSU last week Towson was running on NDSU. Everyone has shown weakness. 4 Quote
ND1 Posted September 22 Posted September 22 52 minutes ago, fightingsioux4life said: Ask yourself this: Would San Diego have receivers running wide open down the field playing pitch and catch with the QB if they were in Fargo or Brookings? The answer to that question highlights the gulf that exists between UND and both xDSUs. Winning games like this handily should become the norm if we want to get our program to the level of the xDSUs. That being said, the defense is 1000% better than last year, the o-line is solid and the running game is fun to watch. There is definite potential for further growth and improvement as the season progresses. SDSU just beat a D2 school last week by 21 points and they struggled to do so. It happens, but I get your point. 2 Quote
homer Posted September 22 Posted September 22 56 minutes ago, fightingsioux4life said: Ask yourself this: Would San Diego have receivers running wide open down the field playing pitch and catch with the QB if they were in Fargo or Brookings? The answer to that question highlights the gulf that exists between UND and both xDSUs. Winning games like this handily should become the norm if we want to get our program to the level of the xDSUs. That being said, the defense is 1000% better than last year, the o-line is solid and the running game is fun to watch. There is definite potential for further growth and improvement as the season progresses. I would guess NDSU has similar complaints about their defense. They haven’t been very good this season. Teams haven’t had to throw against them. Coaches just need to worry about us. Lots of inexperience out there and I like the different types of teams we have seen and found a way to beat this far. Schedule gets much more difficult from here so wins will be hard to come by and we are going to struggle at times. 1 Quote
SiouxFan100 Posted September 22 Author Posted September 22 Did Romfo skip any passes today? I don’t remember any. we have shown some good and exposed some weaknesses so far this year. I think we are still improving though trying to be optimistic and realistic Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted September 22 Posted September 22 Just now, SiouxFan100 said: Did Romfo skip any passes today? I don’t remember any. we have shown some good and exposed some weaknesses so far this year. I think we are still improving though trying to be optimistic and realistic There is definite room for growth. And it is nice to have some semblance of a defense this year. Last year's unit was unwatchable. 1 Quote
FSSD Posted September 22 Posted September 22 1 hour ago, The Sicatoka said: I hear you but just like ETSU last week Towson was running on NDSU. Everyone has shown weakness. IMO our passing game is not a weakness. it doesn't exist. Safeties are 7 maybe 8 yard off the LoS. Right now pump routes are only passing offense. As the competition improves that is not going to cut it. Quote
Popular Post ND-fan Posted September 22 Popular Post Posted September 22 I don’t know much about details of football when it comes to attacking the opposition but this years team seem to be making adjustments because we’re getting beat at times but then we’re dominating at times to comeback and win football games. I look at the top teams in the valley they are doing the same and they have been struggling to win games. The bottom line is we’re winning games. I have followed this forum since end of last season with everyone bitching about coaching staff and number of players to where I quit looking for a while. I even had doubts when we lost certain players but I think this has been good now because it looks like we now have team bought into coaching staff and staff bought into the players. we may still have poor year but so far this has not happened and still a lot of same people here are not satisfied and seem to want it to happen . I am happy for team, coaches, and looking forward to rest of the season this could be special season and so far very well prepared team. 7 Quote
Devils Posted September 22 Posted September 22 I'm usually pretty patient but I think what we have seen is going to be what we get from Romfo. Hard to believe that's the best we can do with 3 or 4 scholarships used on QBs. 5 for 13 against a non-scholly team for Pete's sake...Not real impressed with our receivers outside of Bo either, but the throws have been pretty rough. Quote
Kab Posted September 22 Posted September 22 42 minutes ago, Devils said: I'm usually pretty patient but I think what we have seen is going to be what we get from Romfo. Hard to believe that's the best we can do with 3 or 4 scholarships used on QBs. 5 for 13 against a non-scholly team for Pete's sake...Not real impressed with our receivers outside of Bo either, but the throws have been pretty rough. Maybe deng will get in now conference play will start Quote
MinnDak Posted September 22 Posted September 22 A win is a win. You can’t say the last three games haven’t been interesting. Outstanding play in some areas. Quote
Nodak78 Posted September 22 Posted September 22 14 minutes ago, MinnDak said: A win is a win. You can’t say the last three games haven’t been interesting. Outstanding play in some areas. Absolutely. Maybe only about 5% or less on this board thought we would be 3-1. Work to do. Just keep improving. Bo with two deep catches. Nate with a circus catch deep. Quote
MinnDak Posted September 22 Posted September 22 1 minute ago, Nodak78 said: Absolutely. Maybe only about 5% or less on this board thought we would be 3-1. Work to do. Just keep improving. Bo with two deep catches. Nate with a circus catch deep. Iowa State and Montana showing this is a championship caliber team that so far is maybe at 50% potential and certainly hasn’t played a good complete game and still at 3-1. The best players at some positions might not even be on the field yet? Like you said no one expected this start. After the awful pass coverage first half and passing game and to flip it all the second half is historically unique. Next week is the trap trap trap game then on to the Super Bowl. Quote
Nodak78 Posted September 22 Posted September 22 5 minutes ago, MinnDak said: Iowa State and Montana showing this is a championship caliber team that so far is maybe at 50% potential and certainly hasn’t played a good complete game and still at 3-1. The best players at some positions might not even be on the field yet? Like you said no one expected this start. After the awful pass coverage first half and passing game and to flip it all the second half is historically unique. Next week is the trap trap trap game then on to the Super Bowl. Agree. This team is different. No one on this every expected our defense to be this much improved. The transfers have made a big difference and younger players stepping up. Quote
UND-FB-FAN Posted September 22 Posted September 22 13 hours ago, gfhockey said: Rydlell nil should give him $10k At a minimum… Quote
UND-FB-FAN Posted September 22 Posted September 22 13 hours ago, fightingsioux4life said: Ask yourself this: Would San Diego have receivers running wide open down the field playing pitch and catch with the QB if they were in Fargo or Brookings? The answer to that question highlights the gulf that exists between UND and both xDSUs. Winning games like this handily should become the norm if we want to get our program to the level of the xDSUs. That being said, the defense is 1000% better than last year, the o-line is solid and the running game is fun to watch. There is definite potential for further growth and improvement as the season progresses. This thought went through my head, and I agree: we still aren’t quite there yet, and spotlight continues to focus on the aged “leader” Quote
UND-FB-FAN Posted September 22 Posted September 22 15 hours ago, homer said: Won the game the way this team is going to have to win early in the year. Not pretty but it’s a win. Offense got to see today how teams will play them from here on out. The upgrade at O-cord is noticeable. Don't want to proclaim too much yet, but it does continue to look like we have significantly upgraded at offensive coordinator and maybe even offensive line coach. Still want to see how year 2 looks like after a year of recruiting and transfer portal entrees into the program … 3 Quote
Popular Post UND-FB-FAN Posted September 22 Popular Post Posted September 22 16 hours ago, Oxbow6 said: Bo had 3 catches on 10 targets Many of those targets were awful throws, but at least they’re targeting their playmaker out wide. The two deep connections to Bo in the second half were critical (and great calls by Fruechte). 5 Quote
wheelsup Posted September 22 Posted September 22 1 minute ago, UND-FB-FAN said: Don't want to proclaim too much yet, but it does continue to look like we have significantly upgraded at offensive coordinator and maybe even offensive line coach. Still want to see how year 2 looks like after a year of recruiting and transfer portal entrees into the program … My guess is OL is a push at best.. gotta give a ton of credit to pawlak for building enough depth that we could lose 4 top notch OL and still be really good. A few years back that would have been recipe for disaster. Olson is doing awesome and let’s hope he can recruit as well as pawlak. OC is a really interesting comparison. Freuchte has been great at leaning into the strength of the team. Would be nice to see freuchte calling plays for last years offense.. and have this years defense. 2 Quote
wheelsup Posted September 22 Posted September 22 11 minutes ago, UND-FB-FAN said: This thought went through my head, and I agree: we still aren’t quite there yet, and spotlight continues to focus on the aged “leader” This year our “aged leader” is having a great year. Second half has been better than the first.. only real complaints I have are QB play and our willingness to kick the ball out of bounds. Neither of which are the aged leaders fault. I don’t believe that bubba selects the qb but that’s just me. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.