Shawn-O Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 On the professional level, as far as taking the family to a game, MLB and MLS are the best value out there. NFL, NBA, and NHL prices have spiraled out of control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 Wanna keep women's ice hockey? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 Regarding Title IX, you only have to meet one of the three prongs. UND appears to be going for pure equity (prong 1)*. You can try to prove (sue) UND is failing another prong; however, by meeting one of the three you've met all of Title IX. *NDSU appears to use prong 3 - opportunities and interests. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDvince97-01 Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 1 hour ago, The Sicatoka said: Regarding Title IX, you only have to meet one of the three prongs. UND appears to be going for pure equity (prong 1)*. You can try to prove (sue) UND is failing another prong; however, by meeting one of the three you've met all of Title IX. *NDSU appears to use prong 3 - opportunities and interests. It's my understanding there are 3 "components" to Title IX that must be met for compliance. The "3 prong test" only applies to the 1st "component" for Title IX compliance - "Participation". You need to comply with only 1 of 3 prongs to satisfy the 1st component. The 3 prongs of the 1stParticipation "component" are: 1. Proportionality 2. History and Continuing Practice 3. Accommodate Interests and Abilities After that... The 2nd "component" (proportional financial assistance) must also be met. And then... The 3rd "component" (benefit and opportunity equivalence) must also be met. There are 11 criteria here. This is where facilities requirements are met. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 Most Title IX suits go after the Participation angle. Why? It's the "squishiest". The other two (financials, opportunity) are pretty objective. https://nwlc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Final Athletics Fact Sheet.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDvince97-01 Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 12 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: Most Title IX suits go after the Participation angle. Why? It's the "squishiest". The other two (financials, opportunity) are pretty objective. But there is more to comply with for Title IX than just 1 prong of the 1st component is my point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxForever Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 Can we close this thread? It's a done deal. I'm over it. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWSiouxMN Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 http://www.mankatofreepress.com/sports/frederick-column-north-dakota-s-cost-cutting-move-is-msu/article_751bbb28-23e8-11e7-a942-8bcfa3454638.html Should be only a matter of time with the rest. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gfhockey Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 Schloss the crusader is up to his old tricks again and spewing rumors 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 9 hours ago, UNDvince97-01 said: But there is more to comply with for Title IX than just 1 prong of the 1st component is my point. And mine is that the other aspects are so objective that either you meet it or don't. The fuzzy, open to litigation angle, is always "equity" so that's where the challenges come. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 8 hours ago, SWSiouxMN said: http://www.mankatofreepress.com/sports/frederick-column-north-dakota-s-cost-cutting-move-is-msu/article_751bbb28-23e8-11e7-a942-8bcfa3454638.html Should be only a matter of time with the rest. First: Mankato is a DII (Northern Sun bus league) playing just DI hockey. It's much easier to manage costs. Next: Quote Efforts to try to salvage the program after the announcement, including letters from prominent alumni and a social media campaign were non-starters, and when Fighting Hawks coach Brian Idalski told his team last week that, “the fight is over,” according to Kolstad, players began looking for new places to play. Folks should take heed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cberkas Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 9 hours ago, SWSiouxMN said: http://www.mankatofreepress.com/sports/frederick-column-north-dakota-s-cost-cutting-move-is-msu/article_751bbb28-23e8-11e7-a942-8bcfa3454638.html Should be only a matter of time with the rest. I thought it was going to be about Mankato cutting women's hockey, not Kolstad transferring there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 The women's team should have understood that results drive attendance. Just because UND supports the men's program does not mean they were entitled to anything. Still don't understand how this caught anyone off guard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdub27 Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 15 minutes ago, homer said: The women's team should have understood that results drive attendance. Just because UND supports the men's program does not mean they were entitled to anything. Still don't understand how this caught anyone off guard. Because Idalski seemed to think that the amount of required cuts announced and the number of what he thought his hockey budget was being nearly identical was nothing more than a coincidence. I do agree though, seems like a lot of entitlement on their part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 37 minutes ago, homer said: The women's team should have understood that results drive attendance. Just because UND supports the men's program does not mean they were entitled to anything. Still don't understand how this caught anyone off guard. So many forget the days when the 6000 seat Ralph had maybe 3000 in it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 Sidebar: Quote ... Brian Idalski told his team last week that, “the fight is over,” according to Kolstad, ... This is how reporting is done. The MFP guy is reporting something coming to him second hand; but, he still gives attribution to legitimize the claimed statement. The MFP must be a "boutique" paper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post The Sicatoka Posted April 18, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted April 18, 2017 (I also put this into Schlossman's blog post from today.) A simple $60 million donation to seed a women's hockey endowment and the problem is solved. I'm surprised Norway, Denmark, Sweden, and Germany aren't lining up to do that. They've said their Olympic programs would benefit. Call it the NEWTDP: Northern Europe Women's Teams Development Program. Problem solved. What? No calls from Oslo, Copenhagen, Stockholm, or Berlin asking where to send the check? Strange. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cberkas Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 42 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: (I also put this into Schlossman's blog post from today.) A simple $60 million donation to seed a women's hockey endowment and the problem is solved. I'm surprised Norway, Denmark, Sweden, and Germany aren't lining up to do that. They've said their Olympic programs would benefit. Call it the NEWTDP: Northern Europe Women's Teams Development Program. Problem solved. What? No calls from Oslo, Copenhagen, Stockholm, or Berlin asking where to send the check? Strange. I find it hard to believe that UND would turn down someone willing to give them $60 million like Brad said or made it seem that Chipman was going to do for the women's team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 3 hours ago, gfhockey said: Schloss the crusader is up to his old tricks again and spewing rumors ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 19 minutes ago, cberkas said: I find it hard to believe that UND would turn down someone willing to give them $60 million like Brad said or made it seem that Chipman was going to do for the women's team. If you had $60 million, would you make this investment? Even if you had a kid on the team? From TheSchlossBlog: Quote 3. Yes, the players did ask if they could raise money. They were told, “no.” Among those who inquired about how they could help save the team was Mark Chipman, who is the head of the group that owns the Winnipeg Jets. Chipman is a UND alum and one of his daughters plays on the team. He wrote a letter the day after the announcement and had phone conversations with those at UND, but there doesn’t appear to be a lot of movement there. So, Mr. Chipman, a businessman, called. I have nothing but supposition here, but I suspect the conversation went something like ... MC: I heard you cut women's hockey. That doesn't make my daughter or me happy. Why'd you do it? MK: The State is cutting our funding 20%. Women's hockey lost $2 million last year. We have to balance all the department budgets. MC: How much? MK: About $2 million of loss. MC: So is there anything that can be done? MK: Well, if we had a $60 million endowment the program could self-sustain and be ... MC: How much? MK: $60 million. Just make the check out to the UND Foundation Women's Hockey endowment. < dial tone > 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cberkas Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 3 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: If you had $60 million, would you make this investment? Even if you had a kid on the team? Maybe, there are things I'd like UND to have to make the fan experience better and get recruits (the on-ice projection system, the same system for basketball and football). There are sports I'd like UND to have (lacrosse), but there will be an outcry for cut sports to be added first. If he was willing to write a check to UND to fund the team and what else goes with it for title IX, why wouldn't they take the offer. Chipman could be someone who could help finish the HPC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 Was told that as now Chipman doesn't donate to UND. Doesn't mean he wouldn't in the future but he does not currently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 4 minutes ago, cberkas said: If he was willing to write a check to UND to fund the team ... You assume that's how the conversation went. I assume otherwise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 3 minutes ago, UND1983 said: Was told that as now Chipman doesn't donate to UND. Doesn't mean he wouldn't in the future but he does not currently. He's made donations in the past. Five-figure range. There's beaucoup difference between five-figures and seven- or eight-figures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cberkas Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 5 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: You assume that's how the conversation went. I assume otherwise. That's why I said Brad made it sound that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.