Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 2/2/2014 at 9:49 PM, brianvf said:

To be fair, I think that game was played without goalies and they were just playing pipes instead.

With Rocco, hopefully that's the case next weekend too!

  • Upvote 1
Posted
  On 2/2/2014 at 9:49 PM, brianvf said:

To be fair, I think that game was played without goalies and they were just playing pipes instead.

Both those teams have struggled defensively of late IMO.

Top of the league in offense, bottom of the league in defense.

Posted
  On 2/2/2014 at 11:39 PM, siouxforce19 said:

Both those teams have struggled defensively of late IMO.

Top of the league in offense, bottom of the league in defense.

Yeah, UND could probably hang 8 on SCSU if they didn't care about giving up 6...

Posted

As I posted on collegehockeyranked, there's some new uncertainty in how to implement this year's revised RPI/PWR.

CHN has published their tables for the first time, noting that they're different from everyone else's, but that they're sure they're right.

I've been in communication with both them and USCHO, and I'm not sure there's going to be a quick resolution to this. So, for now, we probably shouldn't be treating anyone's PWR tables as quite so much a "fact" as we did in past years.

For now, SiouxSports' tables match USCHO, though I'll definitely watch both carefully and try to do some analysis as to how different the two techniques really are.

Posted
  On 2/6/2014 at 2:10 AM, jimdahl said:

As I posted on collegehockeyranked, there's some new uncertainty in how to implement this year's revised RPI/PWR.

CHN has published their tables for the first time, noting that they're different from everyone else's, but that they're sure they're right.

I've been in communication with both them and USCHO, and I'm not sure there's going to be a quick resolution to this. So, for now, we probably shouldn't be treating anyone's PWR tables as quite so much a "fact" as we did in past years.

For now, SiouxSports' tables match USCHO, though I'll definitely watch both carefully and try to do some analysis as to how different the two techniques really are.

Thanks Jim, this stuff really interests me and I hope UND doesn't show up as making the tournament in one site's predictions and out in the other or Selection Sunday could be a nail-biter this year!

Which day will you put out UND's PWR predictions for this weekend? Made a nice jump while dormant last week, moving to #15.

Posted
  On 2/6/2014 at 2:10 AM, jimdahl said:

As I posted on collegehockeyranked, there's some new uncertainty in how to implement this year's revised RPI/PWR.

CHN has published their tables for the first time, noting that they're different from everyone else's, but that they're sure they're right.

I've been in communication with both them and USCHO, and I'm not sure there's going to be a quick resolution to this. So, for now, we probably shouldn't be treating anyone's PWR tables as quite so much a "fact" as we did in past years.

For now, SiouxSports' tables match USCHO, though I'll definitely watch both carefully and try to do some analysis as to how different the two techniques really are.

So how do we find out who has the most accurate PWR? I like the ones that have UND in 14th... :)

Posted
  On 2/6/2014 at 7:24 PM, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said:

Yeah, I say we let it play out and whichever system we're higher in at the end of the year is the correct one

LOL! That one works for me as well.

Posted

UND PWR outlook with 10 games to go

The "end of regular season" chart moved exactly how it should have for a split since the last one.

The "one week" chart shows a lot of downside potential (which fits with the other chart's claim that UND needs to go 7/10 just to keep up with its current ranking or climb slightly).

undendofseason.png

undoneweek.png

Note that I'm still using the USCHO formula, because it's the one I had working first. Still working on the CHN formula.

Posted
  On 2/6/2014 at 9:09 PM, jimdahl said:

UND PWR outlook with 10 games to go

The "end of regular season" chart moved exactly how it should have for a split since the last one.

The "one week" chart shows a lot of downside potential (which fits with the other chart's claim that UND needs to go 7/10 just to keep up with its current ranking or climb slightly).

undendofseason.png

undoneweek.png

Note that I'm still using the USCHO formula, because it's the one I had working first. Still working on the CHN formula.

What about two ties?

Posted
  On 2/6/2014 at 9:44 PM, siouxweet said:

you just be quiet about ties, you just want to see the farce that is called a shootout. :D

I have yet to see one this year, and I might not eh?

Posted
  On 2/6/2014 at 10:45 PM, Goon said:

I have yet to see one this year, and I might not eh?

you've seen plenty-you watch the nhl and other college hockey. although that brings up a what if scenario, say und wins friday night and then wins a shootout on saturday, would they do a stick salute beings it wasn't a true sweep?

Posted
  On 2/6/2014 at 11:11 PM, siouxweet said:

you've seen plenty-you watch the nhl and other college hockey. although that brings up a what if scenario, say und wins friday night and then wins a shootout on saturday, would they do a stick salute the traditional circle of sticks beings it wasn't a true sweep?

FYP

  • Upvote 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...