jimdahl Posted February 12, 2013 Posted February 12, 2013 I feel like there have been a lot of American Indian nickname stories lately... Braves reject screaming Indian logo Quote
jimdahl Posted February 12, 2013 Author Posted February 12, 2013 And what an odd saga the Redskins name has been over the last few days... Redskins nickname takes beating at symposium NFL.com Redskins name change demanded at Smithsonian forum Washington Post Redskins want you to know their nickname is common NFL.com We are very proud to be called Redskins redskins.com Redskins use high school athletic director to defend team name USA Today Washington Redskins proudly defend their name in the dumbest way possible deadspin.com D.C. mayor backpeddles on Redskins name change NBCSports Quote
MafiaMan Posted February 13, 2013 Posted February 13, 2013 I saw the article yesterday on the Atlanta Braves BP hat...their Indian-head logo is terrible anyways so it's not a shame that it's going by the wayside, but further proof that a small minority can sway opinion in a big way. Quote
NDRPinLV Posted February 13, 2013 Posted February 13, 2013 The CNN author states, "[t]he NCAA imposes a ban on offensive Native American mascots and last year, voters dumped the University of North Dakota's Fighting Sioux mascot." The same has been stated in other media stories recently including a big write up on UND hockey in the Las Vegas Review Journal. Although maybe technically correct, the statement is made out of context and does not give the complete picture that the voters rejected the nickname out of concern for loss of conference affiliation and other NCAA sanctions. Quote
82SiouxGuy Posted February 13, 2013 Posted February 13, 2013 The CNN author states, "[t]he NCAA imposes a ban on offensive Native American mascots and last year, voters dumped the University of North Dakota's Fighting Sioux mascot." The same has been stated in other media stories recently including a big write up on UND hockey in the Las Vegas Review Journal. Although maybe technically correct, the statement is made out of context and does not give the complete picture that the voters rejected the nickname out of concern for loss of conference affiliation and other NCAA sanctions. The same thing can be said about many stories and many issues. It is rare that any news outlet explains all of the details and history for a story, or takes the time to give the store context. They give the facts, or the facts as they know them. It would take too much time or space, and most viewers or readers don't want to take the time. Or they don't care. Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted February 13, 2013 Posted February 13, 2013 The same thing can be said about many stories and many issues. It is rare that any news outlet explains all of the details and history for a story, or takes the time to give the store context. They give the facts, or the facts as they know them. It would take too much time or space, and most viewers or readers don't want to take the time. Or they don't care. Isn't this sad commentary on our society? Quote
jodcon Posted February 13, 2013 Posted February 13, 2013 Isn't this sad commentary on our society? When it comes to the media's view on coverage it's kind of like cooking...the ingredients are never as good as the result. 1 Quote
ScottM Posted February 14, 2013 Posted February 14, 2013 I feel like there have been a lot of American Indian nickname stories lately... Braves reject screaming Indian logo Maybe this would be better. http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-atlanta-braves-logo-features-gruesome-depictio,31284/ Quote
UNDvince97-01 Posted February 20, 2013 Posted February 20, 2013 Very, very interesting read on Central Michigan and their use of "Chippewas": http://espn.go.com/blog/playbook/fandom/post/_/id/18484/tribe-supports-native-american-mascots Quote
The Sicatoka Posted March 7, 2013 Posted March 7, 2013 The NFL's Redskins back in the news. http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/03/07/fight-on-battle-over-redskins-name-heads-to-court/ Quote
Hayduke Posted March 7, 2013 Posted March 7, 2013 The NFL's Redskins back in the news. http://washington.cb...heads-to-court/ To be honest, in my opinion if there is one Native American "nickname" that needs to go, it's this one. The strategy is kind of interesting. Get rid of their trademark of "Redskins" to weaken them financially. I wonder if that would affect their licensing on their logo? Probably not, but if it did would that force them to find a new name to hang onto the licensing? Or, what if this would open the floodgates on pirated material with Redskins all over it? Wouldn't that just increase the number of sightings of the name? Quote
darell1976 Posted March 7, 2013 Posted March 7, 2013 To be honest, in my opinion if there is one Native American "nickname" that needs to go, it's this one. The strategy is kind of interesting. Get rid of their trademark of "Redskins" to weaken them financially. I wonder if that would affect their licensing on their logo? Probably not, but if it did would that force them to find a new name to hang onto the licensing? Or, what if this would open the floodgates on pirated material with Redskins all over it? Wouldn't that just increase the number of sightings of the name? So if the Redskins got rid of the name....could they bring it back during the times NFL teams do throwback games. Quote
Hayduke Posted March 7, 2013 Posted March 7, 2013 So if the Redskins got rid of the name....could they bring it back during the times NFL teams do throwback games. Good question. I would think so. There doesn't appear to be any pressure by the NFL for them to remove their name. Unlike what happened to UND with the NCAA. Quote
ScottM Posted March 7, 2013 Posted March 7, 2013 To be honest, in my opinion if there is one Native American "nickname" that needs to go, it's this one. The strategy is kind of interesting. Get rid of their trademark of "Redskins" to weaken them financially. I wonder if that would affect their licensing on their logo? Probably not, but if it did would that force them to find a new name to hang onto the licensing? Or, what if this would open the floodgates on pirated material with Redskins all over it? Wouldn't that just increase the number of sightings of the name? Probably the best damn advertising their money wouldn't have to buy. I don't see Snyder changing the name. Both the team and the NFL have too much invested in it. Quote
darell1976 Posted March 7, 2013 Posted March 7, 2013 Probably the best damn advertising their money wouldn't have to buy. I don't see Snyder changing the name. Both the team and the NFL have too much invested in it. Just as the Cleveland Indians not getting rid of Chief Wahoo. $$$$$$ Quote
Hayduke Posted March 7, 2013 Posted March 7, 2013 Probably the best damn advertising their money wouldn't have to buy. I don't see Snyder changing the name. Both the team and the NFL have too much invested in it. You know, I was thinking about where this lawsuit is happening. Federal Court...D.C. Entrenched politicians in D.C. love the Redskins. This is gonna be a tough one for an anti-nickname group to pull off. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted March 7, 2013 Posted March 7, 2013 Cooperstown (NY) High School Redskins? Gone. http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_COOPERSTOWN_SCHOOL_NICKNAME?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-03-07-10-22-11 Quote
darell1976 Posted March 7, 2013 Posted March 7, 2013 Cooperstown (NY) High School Redskins? Gone. http://hosted.ap.org...-03-07-10-22-11 The vote was prompted by Cooperstown Central School students who found it offensive to American Indians. Funny how those students found it offensive, but at Grand Forks Central we didn't find it offensive in 1991. Quote
Chewey Posted March 7, 2013 Posted March 7, 2013 Just more expressions of boredom (cries for help?) by hypersensitive jerk offs. Quote
Teeder11 Posted March 11, 2013 Posted March 11, 2013 Sioux tribes want to sing with one voice now. Good luck. http://www.grandfork...group/homepage/ Quote
andtheHomeoftheSIOUX!! Posted April 26, 2013 Posted April 26, 2013 Not an Indian nickname, but relevant to this thread. DailyCaller Regarding UConn's new logo: In an open letter to UC President Susan Herbst, self-described feminist student Carolyn Luby wrote that the redesigned team logo will intimidate women and empower rape culture. Quote
Speez Posted April 26, 2013 Posted April 26, 2013 Not an Indian nickname, but relevant to this thread. DailyCaller Regarding UConn's new logo: In an open letter to UC President Susan Herbst, self-described feminist student Carolyn Luby wrotethat the redesigned team logo will intimidate women and empower rape culture. That woman sure needs some help. Quote
Oxbow6 Posted April 26, 2013 Posted April 26, 2013 Not an Indian nickname, but relevant to this thread. DailyCaller Regarding UConn's new logo: She's an embarrassment to rational, sane women everywhere! Quote
darell1976 Posted April 26, 2013 Posted April 26, 2013 Not an Indian nickname, but relevant to this thread. DailyCaller Regarding UConn's new logo: Seriously?? The logo looks like the T-Wolves logo. What about it empowers the rape culture? The logo and the teams it represents are menacing to women, she wrote. She needs help....or laid whichever happens first. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.