siouxweet Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 3/8/09 Northeast 1)Boston Univ. 16)Bemidji 8)New Hampshire* 10)Cornell Midwest 2)Notre Dame 15)Air Force 7)North Dakota 11)Miami West 3)Michigan 13)Minnesota * 6)Vermont 12)Princeton East 4)Denver 14)Ohio State 5)Northeastern 9)Yale * My first try at this weeks brackets. This assumes current conference leaders win the automatic bid. The first two out are St. Lawrence and Colorado College. note: * for host teams UND is actually the 8th seed. Quote
The Whistler Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 There is no consipiracy and typically one embarassment is selected to the NCAA field each year. "They" got to Hab-it. Quote
redwing77 Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 That's a lot of tough games. UND vs. Notre Dame would be a very tough game. Michigan and DU, imo, have just about the easiest track to the Frozen Four. DU has a slightly harder track. I don't see Vermont or Princeton giving Michigan too hard of a time. It would be an awful lot of fun once again helping turn Miami into the SCSU of the CCHA. Quote
siouxguyinstpaul Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 Exactly. I knew and said they would be in - weeks ago - and I stand by that even if they are lucky enough to get by St. Cloud in 3 games next weekend and then lose the following Thursday night. Obvious reasons of course. But - hey - what fun is it to have a team host two tourneys and not be in either one of them. Quote
Goon Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 That's a lot of tough games. UND vs. Notre Dame would be a very tough game. Michigan and DU, imo, have just about the easiest track to the Frozen Four. DU has a slightly harder track. I don't see Vermont or Princeton giving Michigan too hard of a time. It would be an awful lot of fun once again helping turn Miami into the SCSU of the CCHA. Hum, I would love to see UND take it to Miami so we could serve RedHack some crow. Quote
sagard Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 "They" got to Hab-it. No way. He takes no chances and won't even enter the land o' lakes. Quote
dagies Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 "They" got to Hab-it. Funniest post of the day. Quote
stickboy1956 Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 Looking ahead using the "build you own PWR" at Slak.net. If the favorites (higher seed not higher rpi/pwr) win the conf tourny games ... 1. We end up 7. If we want to move up we need Yale to lose along the way. We win that comp now but will lose it once they play 2 more Tuc - that will happen in the ECAC semis/finals. Even if we beat Denver in the F5 they still have a slightly better RPI. It probably would go down if AA takes a game in Den this weekend. If not and Den only loses to us they get 3 in the PWR. To flip VT in the end we need them to lose a game this weekend before they would play and lose to BU in the HE semis (there is no 3rd place game in HE). 2. The play in game is huge for the Gophs - if they lose it to CC, the Tigers pass them for 14 in the PWR (barring unforseen upsets in other conf playoffs that could effect PWR), even if CC loses the next 2 to us and Wisco/Den. 3. But that doesn't mean the Gophers are out because, lo and behold, if the favorites win, the Falcons of AF would be 13 in the PWR. Without any other upsets the Gophers would be last in. The RPI is so close for many of the comps that even one loss for a team if the first round playoffs could have a big impact on the rankings. 1 Boston Univ (HE) 24 .6050 2 Notre Dame (CC) 23 .5883 3 Denver U (WC) 21 .5586 4 Michigan (CC) 21 .5712 5 Vermont (HE) 20 .5614 6 Yale (EC) 19 .5569 7 North Dakota (WC) 18 .5577 8 NorthEastern (HE) 18 .5706 9 New Hampshire (HE) 16 .5529 10 Cornell (EC) 15 .5483 11 Princeton (EC) 14 .5464 12 Miami (CC) 13 .5477 13 Air Force (AH) 12 .5404 14 CO College (WC) 11 .5339 15 Minnesota (WC) 10 .5333 16 Wisconsin (WC) 9 .5316 17 St Lawrence (EC) 8 .5322 18 Minn-Duluth (WC) 7 .5199 19 Ohio State (CC) 5 .5315 20 Boston Coll (HE) 5 .5221 Here the "remaining games" you can plug in at slack.net to do your own rankings. (I found a list like this on uscho forum) 20090313 SH 0 AF 1 NC 20090313 HC 0 RT 1 NC 20090313 Ar 0 MH 1 NC 20090313 Ca 0 By 1 NC 20090314 SH 0 AF 1 NC 20090314 HC 0 RT 1 NC 20090314 Ar 0 MH 1 NC 20090314 Ca 0 By 1 NC 20090320 By 0 AF 1 NC 20090320 MH 0 RT 1 NC 20090321 RT 0 AF 1 NC 20090308 LS 0 WM 1 NC 20090313 NO 0 Nt 1 NC 20090313 WM 0 Mi 1 NC 20090313 NM 0 Mm 1 NC 20090313 OS 1 Ak 2 NC 20090314 NO 0 Nt 1 NC 20090314 WM 0 Mi 1 NC 20090314 NM 0 Mm 1 NC 20090314 OS 1 Ak 2 NC 20090320 Ak 0 Nt 1 NC 20090320 Mm 0 Mi 1 NC 20090321 Ak 0 Mm 1 NC 20090321 Mi 0 Nt 1 NC 20090313 AH 0 BS 1 NC 20090313 RM 0 Ni 1 NC 20090314 AH 0 RM 1 NC 20090314 Ni 0 BS 1 NC 20090308 Cg 0 Qn 1 NC 20090313 Bn 0 Ya 1 NC 20090313 Un 0 Pn 1 NC 20090313 RP 0 Cr 1 NC 20090313 Qn 0 SL 1 NC 20090314 Bn 0 Ya 1 NC 20090314 Un 0 Pn 1 NC 20090314 RP 0 Cr 1 NC 20090314 Qn 0 SL 1 NC 20090320 SL 0 Ya 1 NC 20090320 Cr 1 Pn 0 NC 20090321 SL 0 Pn 1 NC 20090321 Cr 0 Ya 1 NC 20090308 BU 1 Pv 0 HE 20090313 Me 0 BU 1 NC 20090313 MA 0 NE 1 NC 20090313 BC 0 NH 1 NC 20090313 ML 0 Vt 1 NC 20090314 Me 0 BU 1 NC 20090314 MA 0 NE 1 NC 20090314 BC 0 NH 1 NC 20090314 ML 0 Vt 1 NC 20090320 NH 0 NE 1 NC 20090320 Vt 0 BU 1 NC 20090321 BU 1 NE 0 NC 20090313 MT 0 ND 1 NC 20090313 AA 0 DU 1 NC 20090313 Mk 0 Wi 1 NC 20090313 MD 0 CC 1 NC 20090313 SC 0 Mn 1 NC 20090314 MT 0 ND 1 NC 20090314 AA 0 DU 1 NC 20090314 Mk 0 Wi 1 NC 20090314 MD 0 CC 1 NC 20090314 SC 0 Mn 1 NC 20090319 Mn 0 CC 1 NC 20090320 CC 0 ND 1 NC 20090320 Wi 0 DU 1 NC 20090321 CC 0 Wi 1 NC 20090321 DU 0 ND 1 NC Quote
gopherz Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 "Slack.net is a private system " Edit....slack.net/hockey Quote
gopherz Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 20090313 SH 0 AF 1 NC 20090313 HC 0 RT 1 NC 20090313 Ar 0 MH 1 NC 20090313 Ca 0 By 1 NC 20090314 SH 0 AF 1 NC 20090314 HC 0 RT 1 NC 20090314 Ar 0 MH 1 NC 20090314 Ca 0 By 1 NC 20090320 By 0 AF 1 NC 20090320 MH 0 RT 1 NC 20090321 RT 0 AF 1 NC 20090308 LS 0 WM 1 NC 20090313 NO 0 Nt 1 NC 20090313 WM 0 Mi 1 NC 20090313 NM 0 Mm 1 NC 20090313 OS 1 Ak 2 NC 20090314 NO 0 Nt 1 NC 20090314 WM 0 Mi 1 NC 20090314 NM 0 Mm 1 NC 20090314 OS 1 Ak 2 NC 20090320 Ak 0 Nt 1 NC 20090320 Mm 0 Mi 1 NC 20090321 Ak 0 Mm 1 NC 20090321 Mi 0 Nt 1 NC 20090313 AH 0 BS 1 NC 20090313 RM 0 Ni 1 NC 20090314 AH 0 RM 1 NC 20090314 Ni 0 BS 1 NC 20090308 Cg 0 Qn 1 NC 20090313 Bn 0 Ya 1 NC 20090313 Un 0 Pn 1 NC 20090313 RP 0 Cr 1 NC 20090313 Qn 0 SL 1 NC 20090314 Bn 0 Ya 1 NC 20090314 Un 0 Pn 1 NC 20090314 RP 0 Cr 1 NC 20090314 Qn 0 SL 1 NC 20090320 SL 0 Ya 1 NC 20090320 Cr 1 Pn 0 NC 20090321 SL 0 Pn 1 NC 20090321 Cr 0 Ya 1 NC 20090308 BU 1 Pv 0 HE 20090313 Me 0 BU 1 NC 20090313 MA 0 NE 1 NC 20090313 BC 0 NH 1 NC 20090313 ML 0 Vt 1 NC 20090314 Me 0 BU 1 NC 20090314 MA 0 NE 1 NC 20090314 BC 0 NH 1 NC 20090314 ML 0 Vt 1 NC 20090320 NH 0 NE 1 NC 20090320 Vt 0 BU 1 NC 20090321 BU 1 NE 0 NC 20090313 MT 1 ND 0 NC 20090313 AA 0 DU 1 NC 20090313 Mk 0 Wi 1 NC 20090313 MD 0 CC 1 NC 20090313 SC 0 Mn 1 NC 20090314 MT 1 ND 0 NC 20090314 AA 0 DU 1 NC 20090314 Mk 0 Wi 1 NC 20090314 MD 0 CC 1 NC 20090314 SC 0 Mn 1 NC 20090319 Mn 1 MT 0 NC 20090320 Mn 1 DU 0 NC 20090320 Wi 1 CC 0 NC 20090321 CC 0 DU 1 NC 20090321 MN 1 Wi 0 NC I made UND get swept by Tech, placing them at 13th in the pairwise. The Gophers won the F5, making them 12th. :sad: Quote
brianvf Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 The Gophers won the F5, making them 12th. Wow, so if the Gophers win out and take the F5...possibly the best they could do is take 12th? They better not falter (and hope that no one behind them wins out or wins their tourney), otherwise they'll be on the outside looking in. Go Sioux! I want to take over the Mariucci regional with a sea of green. Quote
gopherz Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 Wow, so if the Gophers win out and take the F5...possibly the best they could do is take 12th? They better not falter (and hope that no one behind them wins out or wins their tourney), otherwise they'll be on the outside looking in. Go Sioux! I want to take over the Mariucci regional with a sea of green. No, I'm not totally sure of that. The only scenarios I changed was the Gopher games, none of the other ones. We could still beat St. Cloud, lose the play in game, and be in the tournament. Quote
Blackheart Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 No, I'm not totally sure of that. The only scenarios I changed was the Gopher games, none of the other ones. We could still beat St. Cloud, lose the play in game, and be in the tournament. uggh...the fix is definitely in... Quote
Siouxhockey78 Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 No, I'm not totally sure of that. The only scenarios I changed was the Gopher games, none of the other ones. We could still beat St. Cloud, lose the play in game, and be in the tournament. Considering its in the Cities and the NCAA sucks they will find a way to get you guys in if need to be. Nothing against the Gophers one bit Quote
stickboy1956 Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 FYI - if we would have beaten the Badgers Sat we would be 4th in the PWR Quote
LB#11 Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 FYI - if we would have beaten the Badgers Sat we would be 4th in the PWR As dissappointing as that is, we have got to be happy with with all the games the Sioux have won the past 3 months. We also won the MacNaughton Cup, which means another beautiful banner in the Ralph. Quote
MafiaMan Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 As dissappointing as that is, we have got to be happy with with all the games the Sioux have won the past 3 months. We also won the McNaughton Cup, which means another beautiful banner in the Ralph. With all due respect to fans everywhere, if you're going to brag about a trophy, please spell its name correctly: MacNaughton. It's nice to see that the internet is updated rather quickly these days... MacNaughton Cup History Quote
LB#11 Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 With all due respect to fans everywhere, if you're going to brag about a trophy, please spell its name correctly: MacNaughton. It's nice to see that the internet is updated rather quickly these days... MacNaughton Cup History Thanks MafiaMan...I blame the daylight savings thing on my brain fart. Quote
dagies Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 As dissappointing as that is, we have got to be happy with with all the games the Sioux have won the past 3 months. We also won the MacNaughton Cup, which means another beautiful banner in the Ralph. Agreed. And happy to have a solid place in the tourney. If you are the better team, you're the better team. So what if you're a 4th seed or 8th? Better to lose to a 10th seed than a Holy Cross. Sure, it's nice to have last line change, but if you're good enough to win, then get in and win. Quote
MafiaMan Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 Thanks MafiaMan...I blame the daylight savings thing on my brain fart. Hmnnnn...maybe daylight savings time is responsible for the PRI somehow having Minnesota in the NCAA tournament field of 16 despite a 7-9-2 record since January 1st with wins against Michigan Tech, Alaska-Anchorage, Brown, and Northeastern? UMD and a St Cloud sweep are quality wins, I'll spot you that, but still... Quote
RedFrog Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 Just out of curiosity, I checked to see where our RPI would be if Harvard would have swept Brown instead of being swept. We would be at .5415 in RPI, and .0001 ahead of UNH, thus flipping that comparison. We would then be tied for 5th, but sitting in 7th. Just goes to show how much every game affects the RPI/PWR. Quote
siouxweet Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 Just out of curiosity, I checked to see where our RPI would be if Harvard would have swept Brown instead of being swept. We would be at .5415 in RPI, and .0001 ahead of UNH, thus flipping that comparison. We would then be tied for 5th, but sitting in 7th. Just goes to show how much every game affects the RPI/PWR. seeing that we are correcting things this morning our RPI would have been .5515, not .5415. Quote
gopherz Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 Hmnnnn...maybe daylight savings time is responsible for the PRI somehow having Minnesota in the NCAA tournament field of 16 despite a 7-9-2 record since January 1st with wins against Michigan Tech, Alaska-Anchorage, Brown, and Northeastern? UMD and a St Cloud sweep are quality wins, I'll spot you that, but still... You have no idea what you're talking about if you're putting Northeastern in that same group. They are 5th in the Pairwise, get your facts straight before you post that garbage. Much much bigger win than both UMD and SCSU, especially since we beat Northeastern without Schroeder, Hoeffel, and Fairchild. Quote
NorthDakotaHockey Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 I have said it before and I will say it again. Get your West Regional tickets now. Sioux and Gophers are on another post season collision course. Sioux as a #2 seed, Gophers as a #4. Unless, of course, Minnesota has their season ended by Saint Cloud, which could very very well happen. If and once that happens, Sioux are a lock in The John. Of course, I suppose that the Sioux run will put them as a #1 seed. A Gopher #4 seed might send us elsewhere. Hope that that does not happen. Frankly, I would love to see the Sioux end the Gophers season on March 28. Quote
sprig Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 since we beat Northeastern without Schroeder, Hoeffel, and Fairchild. Just where does that come into pairwise, speaking of no mind. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.