gfhockey Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 5 minutes ago, sioux rube said: Read this morning that Sandelin is now 24-8 in the tournament and 12-0 in 1st round games. Pretty amazing He’s a big game coach 1 1 Quote
thUNDer Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 6 minutes ago, gfhockey said: He’s a big game coach Amazing you’re awake already 1 3 Quote
franchise Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 20 minutes ago, thUNDer said: Amazing you’re awake already Or hasn't been to bed 1 1 Quote
Clark17 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 8 big names and 4 potential great games today and tomorrow - all teams have won one some several - it will be fun to watch as long as Sioux win 1 Quote
Siouxphan27 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, thUNDer said: Amazing you’re awake already As the saying goes, you can't drink all day if you don't start in the morning. 1 1 Quote
Popular Post skateshattrick Posted 7 hours ago Popular Post Posted 7 hours ago 2 hours ago, burd said: Most of us have a deep dislike for UMD, mostly because they win titles, but I enjoyed watching them play last night. They can play—and not just the Plantes. No we hate them because they play dirty, historically have injured our players, and their fan base is the worst 1 5 Quote
burd Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 2 hours ago, atxsioux said: I despise the sit back neutral zone trap they often went to last night. Don’t find their brand of hockey that enjoyable when they are doing that. Now is it probably a smart system? Definitely, but not what I’d choose to watch night in and night out Last night was one of the most entertaining games of the tournament so far. Duluth won it off their forecheck. id just as soon they’d lost, btw 3 Quote
farce poobah Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 45 minutes ago, Clark17 said: 8 big names and 4 potential great games today and tomorrow - all teams have won one some several - it will be fun to watch as long as Sioux win Amazing that all the non-champion teams lost in round 1, leaving only previous winners in the national elite 8. Put another way, the remaining 8 teams have won 41 national titles. Blue bloods. Quote
.357 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 hours ago, siouxweet said: Penn State looked all flashy and skilly but no grit. The Dogs out gritted them. $700k didn't buy grit. DiMarsico, Cerrato & Fink were all in a world of hurt at various points last night after UMD was finished with them. Would imagine they'll be physical against Michigan's forwards also. 6 minutes ago, farce poobah said: Amazing that all the non-champion teams lost in round 1, leaving only previous winners in the national elite 8. Put another way, the remaining 8 teams have won 41 national titles. Blue bloods. Cornell won in 1970. Quote
franchise Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 7 minutes ago, .357 said: Would imagine they'll be physical against Michigan's forwards also. One who didnt play yesterday and another who left early. Quote
nascar99 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Wisconsin Michigan State really intrigues me. If State looks how they did for long stretches against UConn, I like Wisconsin's chances. But if this gets above 3 goals, I think State has it Quote
Sioux90 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 6 minutes ago, nascar99 said: Wisconsin Michigan State really intrigues me. If State looks how they did for long stretches against UConn, I like Wisconsin's chances. But if this gets above 3 goals, I think State has it If Wisconsin stays disciplined, I believe they win. Quote
90siouxfan Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 3 hours ago, gfhockey said: He’s a big game coach Wipe your chin, you're drooling. 2 Quote
cberkas Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, 90siouxfan said: Wipe your chin, you're drooling. It's like Bucci and Co. when it comes to McKenna 3 Quote
cowboys5xsbs Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 51 minutes ago, nascar99 said: Wisconsin Michigan State really intrigues me. If State looks how they did for long stretches against UConn, I like Wisconsin's chances. But if this gets above 3 goals, I think State has it I just think State is a better team and has a better goalie. 1 1 Quote
Popular Post burd Posted 4 hours ago Popular Post Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, 90siouxfan said: Wipe your chin, you're drooling. Ahem. That’s not drool. 6 Quote
cberkas Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 8 minutes ago, burd said: Ahem. That’s not drool. You pay extra for that on the OF 2 Quote
siouxfaninseattle Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Based on recent results, I think the natty winner will allow 8 or fewer goals total in 4 games. 1 Quote
thUNDer Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 15 hours ago, nodakgirl93 said: What a game. Now they can stop talking about McKenna. Yeah & those espn on air elites will likely run a 30/30 on Tiger instead 😏 Quote
cberkas Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 8 minutes ago, thUNDer said: Yeah & those espn on air elites will likely run a 30/30 on Tiger instead 😏 The Michigan is being played before the Michigan State/Wisconsin game Quote
thUNDer Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 16 minutes ago, cberkas said: The Michigan is being played before the Michigan State/Wisconsin game Oh boy, again & again & again for each Michigan team. They had to have done some touchy-feely segment regarding the Kelly Green sometime right…… it is Jeremy Schaap after all 1 Quote
cberkas Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 14 minutes ago, thUNDer said: Oh boy, again & again & again for each Michigan team. They had to have done some touchy-feely segment regarding the Kelly Green sometime right…… it is Jeremy Schaap after all The one year they played the Travis Roy video all the time Quote
brianvf Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago MSU/UW DU/WMU UMD/UM Dang, I pretty much dislike all those teams. Ha. So, on one hand, it'll be nice to have three of them eliminated. But then three remain. UND just needs to take care of business and prevent any of them from winning the natty. 1 Quote
hawksfan12 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 17 hours ago, cberkas said: I don't know why people frame it this way. Yes they didn't win a title with him. But there is more to a program than just titles. Regular season success, selling tickets, program prestige, putting guys in NHL. Penn State is probably trying to make clear they are a serious hockey program despite the lack of history. I doubt Penn State or Mckenna really cares they didn't win a title. Penn State gets the relevance and prestige from landing a top pick. He will forever be a "former Penn State player" who is in the NHL to Penn State. Mckenna got the money and probably won't care because he got to be at a big school, have fun, and then make the NHL. 1 1 Quote
nascar99 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, hawksfan12 said: I don't know why people frame it this way. Yes they didn't win a title with him. But there is more to a program than just titles. Regular season success, selling tickets, program prestige, putting guys in NHL. Penn State is probably trying to make clear they are a serious hockey program despite the lack of history. I doubt Penn State or Mckenna really cares they didn't win a title. Penn State gets the relevance and prestige from landing a top pick. He will forever be a "former Penn State player" who is in the NHL to Penn State. Mckenna got the money and probably won't care because he got to be at a big school, have fun, and then make the NHL. Pegula spent that $750k, which is merely a rounding error to him. The Penn State University administration didn't take $750k out of their athletics budget to give to McKenna. Seems like a bunch of fans across the country (disproportionately Gophers fans) keep bringing up the money without the context. It's odd but whatever Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.