AJS Posted yesterday at 01:41 PM Posted yesterday at 01:41 PM 41 minutes ago, atxsioux said: Here’s a take - Denver this year will be the exception. I think say 9/10 future title winners will have a 1st round pick on the roster. I think it goes without saying that we are in a completely new era of college hockey. One year in. I'm with this take @atxsioux. I would say what worked in the past might not in the future. I think we all agree you still want a mix, different roles, some older players, but the talent level in 2x what it was two years ago. 1 2 Quote
cberkas Posted yesterday at 03:16 PM Author Posted yesterday at 03:16 PM 2 hours ago, RedFrog said: How likely is it that there may be a recruiting cycle where a team recruits a player but they go to an AHA, ECAC, CCHA team for a year or two to get their playing time and earn their stripes before then transferring in? I know that this would be a hard way to setup a recruiting schedule/cycle as there would be nothing guaranteeing that you get that transfer or that you would want that player, but I have to imagine that some of these portal transfers are playing out that way anyway, if not in a formal or intended fashion. Then you’ll see those schools push for a development agreement that schools will be sending money for having a player spend a year or two there first. This was brought up by Mercyhursts coach about a year ago. Quote
stoneySIOUX Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 5 hours ago, RedFrog said: How likely is it that there may be a recruiting cycle where a team recruits a player but they go to an AHA, ECAC, CCHA team for a year or two to get their playing time and earn their stripes before then transferring in? I know that this would be a hard way to setup a recruiting schedule/cycle as there would be nothing guaranteeing that you get that transfer or that you would want that player, but I have to imagine that some of these portal transfers are playing out that way anyway, if not in a formal or intended fashion. UND and other schools have been doing this for several years, and I'd expect it to continue to happen, but the pool is SO much deeper now with the CHL. Quote
AJS Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago Lindberg from CC is in. He would jump to #2 for my portal wishlist. 3rd on team in scoring. Top 6 FWD as a sophomore. 2 Quote
scpa0305 Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 2 minutes ago, AJS said: Lindberg from CC is in. He would jump to #2 for my portal wishlist. Ok depth add I suppose. In this new age, you basically have to grab the obvious top 6/pp guys and everyone else will have to be obvious bottom 6 grinders. The days of working yourself up the lineup are over. Quote
AJS Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 1 minute ago, scpa0305 said: Ok depth add I suppose. In this new age, you basically have to grab the obvious top 6/pp guys and everyone else will have to be obvious bottom 6 grinders. The days of working yourself up the lineup are over. Don’t disagree. You’d think you’d need 2 portal upperclassman adds along with ideally 2 high-end CHL players. Is there only 1 high-end portal F left? After JJ who would you want from the portal before Lindberg? Magnussen? Quote
SpudsSioux Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago If Lindberg is a fit, this staff is going to know as well as anybody. Played for Smaby in Waterloo for two years. 1 Quote
Godsmack Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Lindberg didn’t put up eye popping numbers but just from the eye test watching him play, I thought he was solid. 1 Quote
brianvf Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Next year could be sweet. Two Schultz Two Lindberg Two Ruck Quote
tnt Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Godsmack said: Lindberg didn’t put up eye popping numbers but just from the eye test watching him played, I thought he was solid. To be fair, nobody on CC put up eye popping numbers, but like UND, balance can be a good thing. Quote
Godsmack Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 1 minute ago, tnt said: To be fair, nobody on CC put up eye popping numbers, but like UND, balance can be a good thing. That is true. A lack of scoring and scoring depth was a huge problem for CC. Quote
cberkas Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago Arizona State with another portal goalie, Hillebrandt from OSU Not who I thought they'd go after Quote
brianvf Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Lindberg from CC is now at UND according to Tyler Young. 1 Quote
.357 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 5 hours ago, brianvf said: Lindberg from CC is now at UND according to Tyler Young. Smaby coached him at Waterloo, so it's not like UND is getting an unknown commodity. Big, physical kid who likes to hit & has a good work ethic. Look at him as being a replacement for Littler (both will be juniors next year) with Lindberg having higher scoring than Littler last year in similar number of games & better mobility, it appears. Upgrade. “He gets to the right areas, he’s got really good timing, he gets to secondary chances, so he scores rebound goals, he creates some chances on odd-man rushes,” he said in mid February. “He’s had some really good looks and it just hasn’t quite popped for him at the level.” -Kris Mayotte, Colorado Gazette, 02/27/25 1 Quote
SuhakiYeahYeah Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Seems like its unofficially official at this point and its just a matter of when 1 Quote
I Ranger Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 5 minutes ago, SuhakiYeahYeah said: Seems like its unofficially official at this point and its just a matter of when So would this mean we are out on Wiebusch? I would think so based on numbers. 1 Quote
AJS Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 25 minutes ago, I Ranger said: So would this mean we are out on Wiebusch? I would think so based on numbers. Still need 3, so I wouldn’t think this is necessarily true. Of those 3, you’re hoping for a few high-enders. Quote
Fratt Mattin Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 6 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said: Wiebusch to UW according to Brad's list I wonder if we called Lindberg after it became clear we weren't getting Wiebusch Quote
Godsmack Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Fratt Mattin said: I wonder if we called Lindberg after it became clear we weren't getting Wiebusch Is that how it works in the off season? Can programs openly contact players from other programs and see if there’s any interest in coming over? Or does the player/player’s agent need to initiate that? If it’s the former, I could see how annoyed Kris Mayotte might be losing one of his key pieces. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.