sioux rube Posted Sunday at 11:08 PM Posted Sunday at 11:08 PM Bill Guerin deserves a lot of credit. He built a winning team. Maybe not the 20 best American players, but the 20 that fit the best and could win. He added grit instead of glitz. Going 18/18 on penalty kills, including a 90-second 5v3 in the gold medal game is the mark of a good team with grit and toughness. Quote
Godsmack Posted Sunday at 11:12 PM Posted Sunday at 11:12 PM 3 minutes ago, sioux rube said: Bill Guerin deserves a lot of credit. He built a winning team. Maybe not the 20 best American players, but the 20 that fit the best and could win. He added grit instead of glitz. Going 18/18 on penalty kills, including a 90-second 5v3 in the gold medal game is the mark of a good team with grit and toughness. Do you know any names of players who may not have made the cut for USA (or Canada for that matter)? Just curious. Quote
tnt Posted Sunday at 11:23 PM Posted Sunday at 11:23 PM 1 hour ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: 3x3 needs to go away....ncaa....five minutes of 5x5 for overtime. Hopefully Canada losing will help make a push to get rid of it. 1 Quote
tnt Posted Sunday at 11:25 PM Posted Sunday at 11:25 PM 5 hours ago, Godsmack said: Do you know any names of players who may not have made the cut for USA (or Canada for that matter)? Just curious. Cole Caulfield, and Jason Robertson were two big ones for the U.S. that were left off for players with a different skill set. 2 Quote
cberkas Posted Sunday at 11:26 PM Posted Sunday at 11:26 PM 16 minutes ago, Godsmack said: Do you know any names of players who may not have made the cut for USA (or Canada for that matter)? Just curious. Hutson (there were Canadians saying he should use his Canadian citizenship), Robertson, Fox (not even sure he’s in the top 10 American defensemen), Caufield (these are the main snubs), DeBrincat, Tuch, Pinto, and Boeser (these 4 could play roles on the team like Nelson and others). I’m sure there could be more. 1 Quote
cberkas Posted Sunday at 11:28 PM Posted Sunday at 11:28 PM Forgot Knies and Cooley, both hurt or at least Cooley is 1 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Sunday at 11:29 PM Posted Sunday at 11:29 PM 5 minutes ago, tnt said: Hopefully Canada losing will help make a push to get rid of it. yeah it's gimmicky....can you imagine how fun that 5x5 wouldv'e been in ot for the gold..... Quote
cberkas Posted Sunday at 11:31 PM Posted Sunday at 11:31 PM USA Hockey really never gives the 1960 team enough respect its all about the 1980 team. 3 Quote
sioux rube Posted Sunday at 11:38 PM Posted Sunday at 11:38 PM Funny he had no complaints after beating the Czechs in overtime during 3 on 3. And if I remember right he had a minute and a half of 5 on 3 and came up empty 2 Quote
sioux rube Posted Sunday at 11:39 PM Posted Sunday at 11:39 PM 13 minutes ago, tnt said: Cole Caulfield, and Jason Robertson were two big ones for the U.S. that were left off for a players with a different skill set. That would of been my 2 guys also Quote
Goon Posted Sunday at 11:39 PM Posted Sunday at 11:39 PM 9 hours ago, southpaw said: Gotta think Eruzione is cheering for Canada so he stays relevant and can come out of the woodwork every 4 years What kind of comment is that? The 1980 USA Olympic Team will always be relevant. This isn't even up for debate. They're golden legends. 1 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Sunday at 11:44 PM Posted Sunday at 11:44 PM wish the 2 coaches would've approached each other after reg and said/asked "5x5....winner takes all? f the rules...you in?" 1 Quote
Big Green Posted yesterday at 12:21 AM Posted yesterday at 12:21 AM 36 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: wish the 2 coaches would've approached each other after reg and said/asked "5x5....winner takes all? f the rules...you in?" Then both teams get called for too many men and play 3x3. lol 3 Quote
siouxweet Posted yesterday at 12:39 AM Posted yesterday at 12:39 AM Can a portion of the media actually get the facts correct. Yes, 46 years ago today the US beat the Soviets in the Miracle On Ice however this was in the semis and they won the gold two days later. Some are saying it was 46 years ago today they won their last gold medal. 4 Quote
Oxbow6 Posted yesterday at 12:45 AM Posted yesterday at 12:45 AM 2 minutes ago, siouxweet said: Can a portion of the media actually get the facts correct. Yes, 46 years ago today the US beat the Soviets in the Miracle On Ice however this was in the semis and they won the gold two days later. Some are saying it was 46 years ago today they won their last gold medal. I have read that a couple times as well. Not knowing the Russia game was the semifinals is ignorant and lazy in the context of today. But you know this is what the MSM does...right? 2 Quote
cberkas Posted yesterday at 01:12 AM Posted yesterday at 01:12 AM It's framed that it was for the gold against the Soviets. If they would have lost to Finland in the early game, it would have been a foot note in hockey history. Looking at how the medal round was played that game for the most part determined the Soviets might not win the gold. Also, even if everyone in the media said that wasn't the gold medal game most people wouldn't listen anyway. Plus, the feel-good narrative of capitalism vs communism would be ruined for some. Quote
Goon Posted yesterday at 01:18 AM Posted yesterday at 01:18 AM 57 minutes ago, Big Green said: Then both teams get called for too many men and play 3x3. lol That's actually funny. Quote
JohnboyND7 Posted yesterday at 02:49 AM Posted yesterday at 02:49 AM 4 hours ago, Und Princess said: I agree @SIOUXFAN97!!!! 3×3 is risky! Players risk getting hurt 3×3. 5×5 for 5 minutes is a must! What's the injury risk? Quote
brianvf Posted yesterday at 02:51 AM Posted yesterday at 02:51 AM 1 minute ago, JohnboyND7 said: What's the injury risk? If anything, there's less injury risk with all that extra open ice. Quote
Und Princess Posted yesterday at 03:04 AM Posted yesterday at 03:04 AM 11 minutes ago, JohnboyND7 said: What's the injury They could risk injuring players especially the goalie in shootouts. Quote
JohnboyND7 Posted yesterday at 03:05 AM Posted yesterday at 03:05 AM 13 minutes ago, brianvf said: If anything, there's less injury risk with all that extra open ice. And the game ends rather quickly (for better or worse) 1 Quote
cberkas Posted yesterday at 03:21 AM Posted yesterday at 03:21 AM All the injury's happened with Canada on the ice and during 5x5 🤔 1 Quote
Popular Post MafiaMan Posted 21 hours ago Popular Post Posted 21 hours ago On 2/22/2026 at 8:00 AM, southpaw said: Gotta think Eruzione is cheering for Canada so he stays relevant and can come out of the woodwork every 4 years I’ll take, “Dumb posts on the internet for $400, Alex.” 2 3 Quote
JohnboyND7 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Curious if there will be a surge in youth numbers or any sort of future value that can be derived from this. New ice sheets going up all the time. Would be nice to see the US start get some more kids playing over the next 5-10 years. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.