scpa0305 Posted September 11 Posted September 11 21 hours ago, siouxforce19 said: Mini recruiting update on the UND Hockey podcast. 1. Berchild - Schlossman doesn’t think he ends up at UND. Minnesota, Wisconsin and Denver were the schools mentioned. So I have noted not to hold my breath on this one. 2. Beuker - sounds like he’s narrowed down to 4-5 schools. UND is believed to be one of them. 3. Zajic - hasn’t heard anything either way on whether or not UND is in on him or not. They could be, but his contacts haven’t mentioned anything. (Personally I’m thinking Big10. Chicago kids seem to favor that league) Re Berchild…I’ll take a shot in the dark and guess DU Quote
brianvf Posted September 11 Posted September 11 4 minutes ago, scpa0305 said: Re Berchild…I’ll take a shot in the dark and guess DU That's a tough one...would you rather he go B10 or NCHC, but to a school other than UND? Quote
scpa0305 Posted September 11 Posted September 11 14 minutes ago, brianvf said: That's a tough one...would you rather he go B10 or NCHC, but to a school other than UND? At this point NCHC…only because it seems the B10 has been pulling them all. Need to balance it out a bit. I definitely don’t want him going to the gophs. Quote
FSSD Posted September 11 Posted September 11 On 9/10/2024 at 4:15 PM, TwamleyShuffle said: Let’s be real, will SCSU exist in 10 years? That’s the better question A large % of the enrollment at SCSU are high school students utilizing PSCO. Without that program things would be much worse at SCSU. Those that are familiar: Postsecondary Enrollment Options (PSEO) is an opportunity for Minnesota resident high school students in grades 10, 11 or 12, to earn dual credit for both high school and college. Most commonly, PSEO courses are delivered by the postsecondary institution (PSI) online or in person on campus. 1 1 Quote
Goon Posted September 12 Posted September 12 Interesting read on Erik Pohlkamp Quote Erik Pohlkamp had a strong freshman season at Bemidji State with 11 goals and 23 points in 32 games. He’s an NHL draft pick. He tied for the NCAA lead in goals by a freshman defenseman and was seventh in points. Pohlkamp is now likely to be a key member of the defense corps at the University of Denver this season as the Pioneers seek to defend their national championship. When he entered the transfer portal, his experience playing for Carle with the United States at the WJC was top of mind. “To be honest, if I didn’t have ‘D.C.’ as a coach at world juniors, I don’t think I would have ever ended up here. Absolutely not,” Pohlkamp said Tuesday, one day after the defending champs opened training camp for the 2024-25 season. “I think it would have been North Dakota, or definitely closer to home.” Quote
scpa0305 Posted September 12 Posted September 12 24 minutes ago, Goon said: Interesting read on Erik Pohlkamp Obviously…boy that sucks. NTDP being in Plymouth, DC getting the WJC last year (and this year). Nice little advantage. Quote
scpa0305 Posted September 12 Posted September 12 Tanner Walos decommited from Wisco…he’s pretty good. Has an ‘08 younger brother that’s very good. Something to keep an eye on. Quote
brianvf Posted September 13 Posted September 13 And here we go: https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/41243185/whl-braxton-whitehead-commits-arizona-state-challenging-ncaa-rules Quote
.357 Posted September 13 Posted September 13 32 minutes ago, cberkas said: How can ASU get a verbal from a WHL player before the class action suit has even been decided? I know it's inevitable, but doesn't an NCAA school have to wait for the official ruling before a Canadian player can commit from the CHL to the NCAA? This will increase the overall talent pool in D1 hockey, but won't it exclude some marginal American players because NCAA rosters will now be inundated with CHL players? Quote
cberkas Posted September 13 Posted September 13 1 minute ago, .357 said: How can ASU get a verbal from a WHL player before the class action suit has even been decided? I know it's inevitable, but doesn't an NCAA school have to wait for the official ruling before a Canadian player can commit from the CHL to the NCAA? This will increase the overall talent pool in D1 hockey, but won't it exclude some marginal American players because NCAA rosters will now be inundated with CHL players? He's not the first player, maybe the first that aged out of the CH, but he still has to clear the NCAA first unless they remove the ban. I look him up and not surprised he's trying to go NCAA. Quote
brianvf Posted September 13 Posted September 13 1 hour ago, cberkas said: He's not the first player, maybe the first that aged out of the CH, but he still has to clear the NCAA first unless they remove the ban. I look him up and not surprised he's trying to go NCAA. Yeah I doubt that he’ll light up NCAA. He’s just looking to keep playing puck at a higher level. Quote
AlphaMikeFoxtrot Posted September 14 Posted September 14 1 hour ago, cberkas said: Kam Hendrickson to UConn Possibly the quickest decommit and recommit ever. Committed to Princeton last month. Quote
yzerman19 Posted September 14 Posted September 14 23 hours ago, .357 said: How can ASU get a verbal from a WHL player before the class action suit has even been decided? I know it's inevitable, but doesn't an NCAA school have to wait for the official ruling before a Canadian player can commit from the CHL to the NCAA? This will increase the overall talent pool in D1 hockey, but won't it exclude some marginal American players because NCAA rosters will now be inundated with CHL players? They are pushing it because they believe the NCAA won't want to fight a bunch of lawsuits on this. It's piling on to force the issue. As I said earlier, the bigger issue will be with "of age" players, especially ones who are NHL draft picks. The rules there have to be bargained by the league and NHLPA in terms of RFA status, etc. Right now the rules are different for drafted NCAA players and drafted CHL players. I agree that short term it will create some choices where a CHL "graduate" might be a better choice than a kid from say the NAHL for limited spots. Long term, however, I believe it fuels college hockey expansion. More experienced players to help make a fledgling program competitive more quickly. From a player perspective, I like that it gives kids more choices on where they develop while still keeping NCAA an option...CHL is great hockey. Blue Chippas still gonna chippa...first rounders will sign and follow the NHL/CHL rules. I don't expect them foregoing signing bonus and not signing in order to stay college eligible. Your 6th round pick out of the WHL might not sign though in order to keep college as an option. That's where the league and especially the NHLPA is going to weigh in. 2 Quote
Blackheart Posted September 17 Posted September 17 20 hours ago, gfhockey said: What have we gotten Jack Squat to UND? 1 Quote
yzerman19 Posted September 18 Posted September 18 Bummy is high end. He's a good get. Not sure who else we are going after hard. Quote
.357 Posted September 18 Posted September 18 50 minutes ago, yzerman19 said: Bummy is high end. He's a good get. Not sure who else we are going after hard. Once August 1st hit I thought UND would see a flurry of high-end commits; most D1 schools outside of a couple have been quiet. I thought that most sought-after players would have decided by now, unless they're having a hard time narrowing their choices down to just one. Quote
Frozen4sioux Posted September 18 Posted September 18 On 9/13/2024 at 4:34 PM, .357 said: How can ASU get a verbal from a WHL player before the class action suit has even been decided? I know it's inevitable, but doesn't an NCAA school have to wait for the official ruling before a Canadian player can commit from the CHL to the NCAA? This will increase the overall talent pool in D1 hockey, but won't it exclude some marginal American players because NCAA rosters will now be inundated with CHL players? On 9/14/2024 at 4:27 PM, yzerman19 said: They are pushing it because they believe the NCAA won't want to fight a bunch of lawsuits on this. It's piling on to force the issue. As I said earlier, the bigger issue will be with "of age" players, especially ones who are NHL draft picks. The rules there have to be bargained by the league and NHLPA in terms of RFA status, etc. Right now the rules are different for drafted NCAA players and drafted CHL players. I agree that short term it will create some choices where a CHL "graduate" might be a better choice than a kid from say the NAHL for limited spots. Long term, however, I believe it fuels college hockey expansion. More experienced players to help make a fledgling program competitive more quickly. From a player perspective, I like that it gives kids more choices on where they develop while still keeping NCAA an option...CHL is great hockey. Blue Chippas still gonna chippa...first rounders will sign and follow the NHL/CHL rules. I don't expect them foregoing signing bonus and not signing in order to stay college eligible. Your 6th round pick out of the WHL might not sign though in order to keep college as an option. That's where the league and especially the NHLPA is going to weigh in. I see this as a massive blow to USA Hockey overall. How I see it playing out.. There will be a huge influx of MJ age outs flooding the NCAA spots, and this will absolutely shut out opportunities for USHL and NAHL kids in the USA hockey system. Yes, eventually college hockey will expand but at a minimum It will take 7-10 years for college hockey to expand to accommodate the influx of players. Zero top talent kids will go the NCAA route immediately, they will absolutely go MJ with college being the age out option for further development. It will be easy for the MJ teams to attract and convince kids of this path, especially in the time it takes NCAA to React/FugUp that reaction/Adapt to the ne norm. NCAA Hockey will be the backup plan The other side of the shitsandwich is specifically WHO it hurts the most: 2005/2006/2007 kids (maybe even 2008s) because they will be the ones caught in the middle of the influx and expansion options, a group of kids already the most effected by the covid shutdowns, extra years, and everything they've had to go through.. In the end NCAA wont be competing with MJ for players it will be competing with the ECHL and Europe for players. Different world is coming. Losers: NCAA Hockey, USHL Massive Losers: NAHL, USA Hockey players Winners: Canadian Major Juniors, NHL teams, Canadian Junior A Massive Winners: AAA Hockey programs who can further push the need to pay for exposure and development, Quote
stoneySIOUX Posted September 18 Posted September 18 15 hours ago, .357 said: Once August 1st hit I thought UND would see a flurry of high-end commits; most D1 schools outside of a couple have been quiet. I thought that most sought-after players would have decided by now, unless they're having a hard time narrowing their choices down to just one. The CHL convo is very much a part of this, too. A lot of schools aren't going hard on a massive chunk of players because they see the CHL tap about to be wide open. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.