Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
25 minutes ago, UND1983 said:

Literally the only reason that football got their change is because the alumni/fans had enough and voiced it through several channels.  It was too much to avoid.

The same thing is happening now.  

Correct. But @iramurphy and @jdub27 will call such as alternative fact, baseless assumption, and a strawman argument. 
 

This fan board really is good ol’ entertainment, but it also is an interesting microcosm of what presently troubles UND athletics.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

Those “assumptions” are based upon more historical foundation and factual circumstance than you either realize or are willing to embrace. 

Really?  You must be pretty special to be able to have all of the answers and know what others think.  Good for you. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

Correct. But @iramurphy and @jdub27 will call such as alternative fact, baseless assumption, and a strawman argument. 

Asking where a very specific claim was stated is all those things? We're fine with making up stances and quotes of others with no basis in reality? You're above that nonsense. 

If the claim was actually accurate, the pressure put on to make a change with football wouldn't have made a difference. Enough people did what they felt they needed to in order to make the work and budget challenges worth the squeeze. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted

Always an eye-opening reminder that somethings never change around here; again, a microcosm of the problems that currently haunt UND. Two identities making countless comments on one thing while meaning another, just to try prove a point. “If it looks like a horse, then it’s probably a horse.” Some try way too hard on misdirection.  The culture of UND cannibalism needs to be eliminated. 

Anyways, here we are again at a UND coaching discussion. We all know which way this should go, but why do anything efficiently around here? 

  • Like 2
Posted

There is a recent article in the Aberdeen newspaper regarding potential candidates for the Northern State job, but it's behind a paywall. Anybody read it? Curious whether Sather was mentioned.

Posted
37 minutes ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

image.thumb.png.50b266aaa61b14d6e329250d2b14c282.png

 

Meanwhile, at UND (albeit a low-major and not exactly Villanova), after six seasons and a 73-115 record …

Our athletic department demands greatness 

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 minute ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

did drake's mcoollch apply here when sather got it?

Story goes his agent called and inquired. Said expecting salary Chavez didn’t budge 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 minute ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

did drake's mcoollch apply here when sather got it?

Good lord no.  He was too busy winning and waiting for a much better job

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, HoopsFan03 said:

I think everything comes back to our AD is not good at his job 

We are even getting our asses kicked by the South Dakota schools in the academic all-conference standings for gods sake.  

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, NewUndFan said:

The forum had the coach from minot as a front runner 

I would be surprised by that. He's got a pretty good thing going in Minot, and the pay difference isn't as much as one might think. I think Phillips was making something like $112k. Murken is at around $100k, and is probably in a position to get a raise after the season they just had. I still think the chances are decent that Sather is in the mix.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...