homer Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 3 hours ago, Bison06 said: It’s funny you keep having this discussion and yet we already know how the committee ranked these teams. The outcome is already decided and you want to re-litigate it, for what purpose? Clearly the committee, whose job it is to rank these teams discounted SDSU SoS. If anything, you arguing that SDSU had a better SoS than NDSU only further bolsters my point that the committee discounted SDSU for the DII game. It’s even funnier that you keep coming back here to justify the ranking. Reality is 2,3 and 4 could have been ranked in any order and a case could have been made. You can’t fault UND fans for questioning Lason on the committee based on recent decisions. I personally do think the AQ for a conference should count for something and is a good point I never thought of before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnboyND7 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 32 minutes ago, homer said: It’s even funnier that you keep coming back here to justify the ranking. Reality is 2,3 and 4 could have been ranked in any order and a case could have been made. You can’t fault UND fans for questioning Lason on the committee based on recent decisions. I personally do think the AQ for a conference should count for something and is a good point I never thought of before. The AQ does count for something. It counts for an autobid. In most conferences, that's what determines getting into the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bison06 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 53 minutes ago, homer said: It’s even funnier that you keep coming back here to justify the ranking. Reality is 2,3 and 4 could have been ranked in any order and a case could have been made. You can’t fault UND fans for questioning Lason on the committee based on recent decisions. I personally do think the AQ for a conference should count for something and is a good point I never thought of before. SDSU fans aren’t even questioning the rankings, yet UND fans are. The AQ is decided by the conference, the rankings have nothing to do with that. Also, if you’ve read my posts, I’ve said literally word for word what you just posted. 2,3,4 could have been in any order. Yet they chose ndsu 2, sdsu 3, usd 4. Do you think they just flipped a coin? No, they looked at SoS and clearly discounted DII wins. Which part of what I’ve said do you disagree with? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Bison06 said: SDSU fans aren’t even questioning the rankings, yet UND fans are. The AQ is decided by the conference, the rankings have nothing to do with that. Not one SDSU fan is questioning it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bison06 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 7 minutes ago, homer said: Not one SDSU fan is questioning it? None that I’ve spoken to and I know a lot of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F'n Hawks Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, Bison06 said: SDSU fans aren’t even questioning the rankings, yet UND fans are. The AQ is decided by the conference, the rankings have nothing to do with that. Also, if you’ve read my posts, I’ve said literally word for word what you just posted. 2,3,4 could have been in any order. Yet they chose ndsu 2, sdsu 3, usd 4. Do you think they just flipped a coin? No, they looked at SoS and clearly discounted DII wins. Which part of what I’ve said do you disagree with? We suck so we have to complain about something 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.