Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, SpudsSioux said:

This!.

I love our top end guys for this year (Emerson, Perron and the D) and the current Junior class (Boisvert, Swanson, McInnis). If we could land someone like Emery or Hensler (if he's accelerating) to that class this could turn around in a hurry. Of note, the only coach I've seen that Hensler follows is Berry.

For the Sophomores, have to hope and think we have a shot at the local kids at the NTDP (Laurila, O'Neil and Lindberg).

Edit: YHH confirmed Hensler is accelerating.  

For Hensler, he also has an insta but it's private. I've read it's down to UND, MN, and MI. Don't know how accurate that is. 

Posted

The projected roster has three goalies and fifteen forwards but only six for sure defense. 

Today'd be a good day to get clarity on the last two defense slots. 

Posted
20 hours ago, SiouxFanSince1990 said:

Temper the expectations. I see a team that may struggle to start the year, but will finish strong. 

As long as the struggles don't put us to far down in the pairwise......................

  • Upvote 1
Posted

The more I ponder it the more I think this is a "balance now / balance later" dilemma.

Balance Later: Take two more one-year portals. A year from now you have a junior, four sophs, and three freshmen. That's not very balanced but it is what it is
Balance Now: Find juniors or sophs to flatten the distribution today, but what'll you have for space in a year for (assume Strathmann and Jubenvill and McInnis). 

And does Bubs get to make this decision or is it made for him (meaning who's willing to come in from where and when). 

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

The more I ponder it the more I think this is a "balance now / balance later" dilemma.

Balance Later: Take two more one-year portals. A year from now you have a junior, four sophs, and three freshmen. That's not very balanced but it is what it is
Balance Now: Find juniors or sophs to flatten the distribution today, but what'll you have for space in a year for (assume Strathmann and Jubenvill and McInnis). 

And does Bubs get to make this decision or is it made for him (meaning who's willing to come in from where and when). 

 

McInnis is one I wouldn’t be super confident about being here in a year. He’s hardly played any games this year, so he may need more time.  Obviously a lot can happen in a year but worth keeping an eye on. 

Posted
22 minutes ago, cowboys5xsbs said:

Doesn't this cut into the freshmen class for dmen next year 

Pehrson only has one season left. He fills a need very, very well (RH, defensive, experienced, used to playing with younger guys who'll make coverage errors). 

A year from now Pyke and Pehrson will both be done. 

  • Upvote 2
Posted

I know there's still some nerves around the future pipeline, development, etc. (I, for one, love our pipeline, but as GF says, when have I ever not loved it? LOL), but my goodness, this team came into shape pretty dang well. Big props to Bubs and crew.

This looks like a playoff team on paper, without a doubt. OF COURSE, we all said that last year, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't be optimistic. 

  • Upvote 2
Posted

One more D is mandatory to get to 8D and 26-man roster (right now guessing it's not Strathmann and he plays one more USHL year). 

Now the question: If they run 27-man roster is it 16F or 9D? 

Posted
5 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

One more D is mandatory to get to 8D and 26-man roster (right now guessing it's not Strathmann and he plays one more USHL year). 

Now the question: If they run 27-man roster is it 16F or 9D? 

16F. @I Ranger called it... that decision is directly tied to the uncertainty with Montgomery. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, AJS said:

16F. @I Ranger called it... that decision is directly tied to the uncertainty with Montgomery. 

Has Zmolek's hip been tested in contact yet? That's the other open question. Hence the 16F/9D question. 

Posted

Chemistry and true leadership (or a true leader stepping up on this team) will drive this team to how far it'll go next year imho!

They'll have to gel and teach the freshie D-man and the freshie D-man will need incremental jump/progress for the 2nd half of the season. 

  • Upvote 3
Posted
31 minutes ago, AJS said:

How I think about this is Pehrson might not be the top NHL caliber defenseman that was in the portal, but for what UND desperately needed, he was most likely the most coveted player for the UND coaching staff that was in the portal. The addition of Pehrson changes expectations for next year. Here's where we're at now defensively.

  • Pyke / Pehrson would be a great Top pairing.
  • Zmolek would be a great Second pairing RHD 

Now, you can look at the talented LHD Freshman class and whoever proves it, can step into that 2nd pairing. 

The scouting reports on all three of the portal defenseman has to give everyone so much optimism. Defense first. That's exactly what they need for next year (from those portal additions).

Or split them up and pair one experienced dman with one freshman to break those guys in as well.
The team has certainly come together quickly.

Last season all these decisions took a few more months to work themselves out.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said:

As much as we bemoan the portal, it sure does make the offseason more interesting around here

It's only April. :unsure:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...