MafiaMan Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 On 10/4/2019 at 1:26 PM, southpaw said: No. And you don't want the Summit running the NCHC. I'd take Fenton over Duple for any league in a heartbeat. Would you want Goon in the press box though? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cberkas Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 Summit: UND, DU, UNO, UST NCHC: UND, DU, UNO CCHA: UST I'd guess it'd be more of a merger or fold-in to get the SL another men's team sport. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kab Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 Don’t need summit doing this, wouldn’t end well for nchc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 19 minutes ago, Kab said: Don’t need summit doing this, wouldn’t end well for nchc why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 makes u wonder if that soccer add has a limited shelf life for the summit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 1 hour ago, Kab said: Don’t need summit doing this, wouldn’t end well for nchc The NCAA doesn't favor single-sport conferences. You don't get a seat at some tables. B1G gets a seat; ECAC gets a seat; HEA and NCHC do not. The Summit (multi-sport) would solve this. Yes, the NCHC worries they'd be behind BB in the league office but money talks and UND, DU, and UNO hockey have loud voices. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 2 hours ago, cberkas said: A Midco deal would make a lot more sense for the CCHA if they knew they would be there along with NCHC teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 Summit merging the NCHC might force UST into leaving the CCHA. That hurts the TV value of the CCHA (no MSP). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FSSD Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 27 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: Summit merging the NCHC might force UST into leaving the CCHA. That hurts the TV value of the CCHA (no MSP). And it helps the Summit League with multiple sports in MSP, Denver and Omaha. Phoenix for hockey and KC and Tulsa for basketball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 41 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: Summit merging the NCHC might force UST into leaving the CCHA. That hurts the TV value of the CCHA (no MSP). Not sure what your point is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 2 minutes ago, nodak651 said: Not sure what your point is? TV markets. Recruiting. Alumni outreach. UST in SL(H) is good for SL and not so for CCHA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kab Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 1 hour ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: why? Just a gut feeling why not get football first Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 17 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: TV markets. Recruiting. Alumni outreach. UST in SL(H) is good for SL and not so for CCHA. But were you saying that will make a meaningful difference to the CCHA deal? I think market size makes a bigger difference to the Summit/NCHC than it does the CCHA, where it is pretty much irrelevant. I wasn't trying to be a dick, just seemed like a really vague comment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxHawkGuy Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 6 minutes ago, Kab said: Just a gut feeling why not get football first Tommies need scholarship football asap 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 11 minutes ago, nodak651 said: But were you saying that will make a meaningful difference to the CCHA deal? I think market size makes a bigger difference to the Summit/NCHC than it does the CCHA, where it is pretty much irrelevant. I wasn't trying to be a dick, just seemed like a really vague comment. I'd rather UST be part of the SL and not part of CCHA deal. Better fiscally for SL and no SL makes CCHA less media valuable (no MSP). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 This is from a national media guy who covers our niche (not a hockey guy). I messaged him about the Summit Hockey tweet: 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crb1 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 Where would this leave ASU, surely they wouldn't just join summit for hockey. Does this mean they are going to add UMD and St. Cloud too? I understand it’s all talk at this point. Just some initial thoughts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 6 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: I'd rather UST be part of the SL and not part of CCHA deal. Better fiscally for SL and no SL makes CCHA less media valuable (no MSP). Given that the NCHC talks are happening at the same time as the Midco/CCHA negotiations, I'm guessing all the cards are on the table. Just a guess, but Midco will probably know what's happening with UST/CCHA and Summit League hockey before a Midco/CCHA deal is signed. The NCHC hockey schools could still put a cubbosh on the idea of Summit League hockey, as they did last summer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 3 minutes ago, crb1 said: Where would this leave ASU, surely they wouldn't just join summit for hockey. Does this mean they are going to add UMD and St. Cloud too? I understand it’s all talk at this point. Just some initial thoughts. Zero reason they couldn't all be affiliates. Hockey could theoretically operate with separate books for the most part. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crb1 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 1 minute ago, nodak651 said: Zero reason they couldn't all be affiliates. Hockey could theoretically operate with separate books for the most part. I mean isn’t that what we are doing now to some degree. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 14 minutes ago, crb1 said: I mean isn’t that what we are doing now to some degree. Essentially. I don't think it's necessary for hockey operations to change in a meaninful way in order for the SL to add hockey. In being affiliated with the SL, the hockey schools would benefit by having more input at the NCAA governance level. They would also save overhead expenses and have more support at the conference office, as the SL has much more staff. The SL would benefit because it would help to stabilize the league, as it would be another Men's team sport to satisfy the NCAA's membership requirements for all sports conferences. Could also potentially help the league retain UST, UNO, or Denver, in the event another conference comes calling. Would also help to improve the leagues image. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux>Bison Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 18 minutes ago, crb1 said: Where would this leave ASU, surely they wouldn't just join summit for hockey. Does this mean they are going to add UMD and St. Cloud too? I understand it’s all talk at this point. Just some initial thoughts. Leave St Cloud in the dust. Only accept the MN teams that want to be a true D1 athletic department 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux>Bison Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 19 minutes ago, crb1 said: Where would this leave ASU, surely they wouldn't just join summit for hockey. Does this mean they are going to add UMD and St. Cloud too? I understand it’s all talk at this point. Just some initial thoughts. Where else would ASU go? ASU wanted in to the NCHC more than any other landing spot. Where else would ASU rather go? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 1 minute ago, Sioux>Bison said: Leave St Cloud in the dust. Only accept the MN teams that want to be a true D1 athletic department My dream: drop SCSU and Miami for UST and Mankato (not sure about FB, but probably best if Mankato dropped it). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.