SiouxVolley Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 http://www.wday.com/event/article/id/72540/ Guess NDSU officials can take a hard line against a team, as long as it's a team that doesn't matter. The Forum reports that the sanctions come after the team violated team rules and athletic department policies at a team party and at a separate altercation on Nov. 30 and Dec. 1. The university says the sanctions include game suspensions ranging from three to 10 games. Ray Boyer is the director of the university's police and safety office. He says an investigation involving one or more softball players has been completed and sent to the Cass County State's Attorney's Office. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 http://www.wday.com/...ticle/id/72540/ Guess NDSU officials can take a hard line against a team, as long as it's a team that doesn't matter. Buttfootball. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagger Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 The difference in the way the football and softball incidences were handled initially(and later I am sure) by NDSU are quite dramatically different. It is very laughable. With the football team they needed to have their day in court before they would do anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 The difference in the way the football and softball incidences were handled initially(and later I am sure) by NDSU are quite dramatically different. It is very laughable. With the football team they needed to have their day in court before they would do anything. Its also a difference in athletic directors. Gene cares only about football, while the women's AD cares about the school and laying down the law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxVolley Posted December 14, 2012 Author Share Posted December 14, 2012 Its also a difference in athletic directors. Gene cares only about football, while the women's AD cares about the school and laying down the law. Wouldn't be surprised if Dorn was at the party: she's always getting in fights with people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxVolley Posted December 14, 2012 Author Share Posted December 14, 2012 The difference in the way the football and softball incidences were handled initially(and later I am sure) by NDSU are quite dramatically different. It is very laughable. With the football team they needed to have their day in court before they would do anything. And when they were found guilty in court, nothing was done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watchmaker49 Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 And when they were found guilty in court, nothing was done. Why even though the fb team is in the championship one can still not respect them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gfhockey Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Just cheching. Test post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fightingsioux4life Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 http://www.wday.com/...ticle/id/72540/ Guess NDSU officials can take a hard line against a team, as long as it's a team that doesn't matter. Hey, it's all about "Team Rules, Team Rules, Team Rules, LA, LA, LA, LA, LA, LA!". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Recently NDSU's Athletics administration stated that if they take action involving an athlete or coach it must've been because of ... - sex - drugs - violence Based on their own words, if they do anything it's because of one of those three. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDBIZ Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Recently NDSU's Athletics administration stated that if they take action involving an athlete or coach it must've been because of ... - sex - drugs - violence Based on their own words, if they do anything it's because of one of those three. So can one assume the softball team beat up and had sex with AD Dorn while high on methamphetamine?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 So can one assume the softball team beat up and had sex with AD Dorn while high on methamphetamine?? You may choose to assume that. Me? I'm awaiting the Cass County State's Attorney to chime in on subject. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Let'sGoHawks! Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Buttfootball applies here. Can you blame other programs for getting in trouble, it's okay for the buttfootball team.....why not for them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Why even though the fb team is in the championship one can still not respect them. I respect the players that didnt break the law but I don't respect the players that broke the law unpunished, Craig Bohl and Gene Taylor who thinks football is above the law. Voter fraud is a huge deal and by punishing those players by turning off their tv at 9pm is not the answer to a serious crime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watchmaker49 Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 I respect the players that didnt break the law but I don't respect the players that broke the law unpunished, Craig Bohl and Gene Taylor who thinks football is above the law. Voter fraud is a huge deal and by punishing those players by turning off their tv at 9pm is not the answer to a serious crime. Hence, why you can not respect the players, coaches, AD, et all. Along with why they can not be cheered on to win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Hence, why you can not respect the players, coaches, AD, et all. Along with why they can not be cheered on to win. Maybe you should ask Bison fans why they can't respect UND when we make the playoffs, and if you think they do you are on something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnboyND7 Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Maybe you should ask Bison fans why they can't respect UND when we make the playoffs, and if you think they do you are on something. Because UND is a school that allows hockey players to return to the lineup when it is clear that they need them for the late season push. (Frattin yeah?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Because UND is a school that allows hockey players to return to the lineup when it is clear that they need them for the late season push. (Frattin yeah?) So I guess the feelings are mutual between our two fan bases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxman Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 Because UND is a school that allows hockey players to return to the lineup when it is clear that they need them for the late season push. (Frattin yeah?) And that is a major mistatement of the facts. Frattin was suspended from the team the day after he was stopped for DWI. Hakstol did not wait for the legal system to take its course. Frattin lost his hockey scholarship. Frattin was not a "star" of the hockey team at the time. He was not brought back to the team to help the team for a late season push. He was suspended indefinitely. He came back when he was able to convince Hakstol that he had changed and asked for a chance to re-establish himself, paying his own way in college. Matt's story is quite public and is a story of rehabilitaion and paying his dues. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/03/sports/03frattin.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 And that is a major mistatement of the facts. Frattin was suspended from the team the day after he was stopped for DWI. Hakstol did not wait for the legal system to take its course. Frattin lost his hockey scholarship. Frattin was not a "star" of the hockey team at the time. He was not brought back to the team to help the team for a late season push. He was suspended indefinitely. He came back when he was able to convince Hakstol that he had changed and asked for a chance to re-establish himself, paying his own way in college. Matt's story is quite public and is a story of rehabilitaion and paying his dues. http://www.nytimes.c.../03frattin.html Buttfootball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Csonked Out Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 And that is a major mistatement of the facts. Frattin was suspended from the team the day after he was stopped for DWI. Hakstol did not wait for the legal system to take its course. Frattin lost his hockey scholarship. Frattin was not a "star" of the hockey team at the time. tea He was not brought back to the team to help them for a late season push. He was suspended indefinitely. He came back when he was able to convince Hakstol that he had changed and asked for a chance to re-establish himself, paying his own way in college. Matt's story is quite public and is a story of rehabilitaion and paying his dues. http://www.nytimes.c.../03frattin.html To be fair, I have heard rumors myself that this was the exact reason he was given a 2nd chance and it worked out for everyone involved. We don't know what these NDSU players did and why they were suspended, so it really is not the right time to act all high and mighty as I am assuming that the actions were far more severe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingranch Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 well the rest of the country must not share siouxville' s vile disdain for coach Bohl as he was just announced the winner of the Eddie Robinson award. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Csonked Out Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 well the rest of the country must not share siouxville' s vile disdain for coach Bohl as he was just announced the winner of the Eddie Robinson award. I will be shocked if he is Fargo for longer than another year, simply too good of a coach for the FCS level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FargoBison Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 I will be shocked if he is Fargo for longer than another year, simply too good of a coach for the FCS level. Only thing that has kept him here this long is his refusal take anything less than a BCS level job. Seemed like the only job he really wanted was Minnesota, amazing how stupid they were to take Brewster over Bohl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Csonked Out Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 Only thing that has kept him here this long is his refusal take anything less than a BCS level job. Seemed like the only job he really wanted was Minnesota, amazing how stupid they were to take Brewster over Bohl. I was wondering if Colorado would pursue him....seemed like a decent fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.