The Sicatoka Posted December 6, 2012 Posted December 6, 2012 Let's see, someone goes "hatty" and they cut hat prices 33% for that day. So, instead of selling 3 hats and getting $x.xx they sell 4 hats and get the same $x.xx. So getting the same $x.xx but having one less hat in inventory (assets) is "profit"? That must be "NCAA math." Quote
siouxforeverbaby Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 You may have read that wrong. The Sioux Shop is benefitting from the athlete's achievement by selling more hats (even if they were on sale). I don't believe the Sioux Shop is a non-profit organization. I was fairly certain that they were, but I can't find where it says that other than their website. Quote
crb1 Posted December 9, 2012 Posted December 9, 2012 Women get swept today in Wisconsin. Certainly a tough team to play against especially at home but I was hoping the girls would have come home with at least a split. They need to go on a good clip coming off the Christmas break to make the tourney. Quote
sioux rube Posted December 16, 2012 Posted December 16, 2012 Why is it when I talk to any hockey folks from Grand Forks that they have nothing good to say about Idalski? Anyone care to elaborate? Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted December 16, 2012 Posted December 16, 2012 Why is it when I talk to any hockey folks from Grand Forks that they have nothing good to say about Idalski? Anyone care to elaborate? I don't know who these people are (friends of Shantel Rivard?), but they are clueless and probably care about the men's team only. Idalski is doing what Gene Roebuck did for women's BB back in the early 1990's. Lock him up and keep him as long as you can. Quote
SWSiouxMN Posted December 16, 2012 Author Posted December 16, 2012 Why is it when I talk to any hockey folks from Grand Forks that they have nothing good to say about Idalski? Anyone care to elaborate? My only guess would be that some people feel that Idalski has been underachieving with his teams the past 3 years (including this one) because he has had Jocelyn and Monique. Quote
sioux rube Posted December 16, 2012 Posted December 16, 2012 I don't know who these people are (friends of Shantel Rivard?), but they are clueless and probably care about the men's team only. Idalski is doing what Gene Roebuck did for women's BB back in the early 1990's. Lock him up and keep him as long as you can. It has alot to do with his personality or lack of. I've talked to former players who say the same thing. He has nothing good to say about North Dakota girls hockey and that is a fact. I know that first hand. Quote
gfhockey Posted December 16, 2012 Posted December 16, 2012 it could be how he acts in public he has a had a few incindents in the wedensday night amatuer hockey league in GF im not going to say what happen but im sure if faison has heard about these he has spoken with idalski about them. Quote
sioux rube Posted December 16, 2012 Posted December 16, 2012 it could be how he acts in public he has a had a few incindents in the wedensday night amatuer hockey league in GF im not going to say what happen but im sure if faison has heard about these he has spoken with idalski about them. I have heard about those too. Not liked in that league either. Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted December 20, 2012 Posted December 20, 2012 It has alot to do with his personality or lack of. I've talked to former players who say the same thing. He has nothing good to say about North Dakota girls hockey and that is a fact. I know that first hand. Well, Roebuck never had a warm, outgoing personality, but it never hurt his recruiting or his ability to get the most out of his talent. And no one seemed to have a problem with him. The program Idalski took over was below the level of most club programs. He is starting to get great talent on an annual basis now. Just like football and women's basketball in the early 1990's, it takes time to build a winning tradition and an expectation of sustained excellence in a program. It will come. People just need to be patient. Quote
sioux rube Posted January 12, 2013 Posted January 12, 2013 Amanda Kessel scores 4 goals and adds an assist in the thumping of the Sioux women 6-3. Saw her play back when she played at Shattuck. Smooth and very diciplined player. The Gophers could very well run the table. Quote
sioux rube Posted January 13, 2013 Posted January 13, 2013 And Kessel gets the last 2 today to put the game away 6-3 once again. She alone had as many goals as the enire Sioux team in both games. Quote
sioux rube Posted January 20, 2013 Posted January 20, 2013 With the talent on this team how in the hell are they only.500 in the league? Anyone? Quote
Pony1976 Posted January 20, 2013 Posted January 20, 2013 Injuries to key players will kill you in this conference. Especially long term causing lengthy absences. Not an excuse but illustrates how important team depth is. You really need a handful of players who can fill in well when key players are missing or it will cost you in the W column. Quote
the green team Posted January 21, 2013 Posted January 21, 2013 I see in today's pairwise we are 10th. Unfortunately, we could run the table and still have to win the WCHA tournament to get into the national tournament. When the twins arrived I really never envisioned the team to be in this position during the twins senior season. Shows you what I know of women's hockey, apparently there is more depth around the country than I thought. I can honestly say that when the twins arrived I felt with just by getting 2 players of that caliber, a team would automatically be a top 4 national program. I freely admit how wrong I was. Quote
sioux rube Posted January 27, 2013 Posted January 27, 2013 A much needed sweep of SCSU. I have seen SCSU play. They would get beat by some of the top D3 teams so the Sioux should sweep them every time they play. But yes it was a needed sweep. Quote
SWSiouxMN Posted January 29, 2013 Author Posted January 29, 2013 Women move up to 9th in pairwise. Wisconsin sits in 8th, Duluth sits behind us in 10th, and OSU sits behind them in 11th. Those two head to head wins over Duluth are huge right now in keeping us in our spot, but our 1-3 record against Wisconsin is hurting us from being in the last spot. Really need to keep the focus the next two weekends and not slip up against Mankato (who for whatever reason we have struggled against) and BSU. I like that Shelby has been playing very well between the pipes the last 2 series and I hope that she can keep it going. Quote
undwhockey Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 SCSU would NOT lose to any d3 team. That is absurd. Sioux rube seems to lack knowledge of the Women's game and the coaching staff. Quote
sioux rube Posted February 2, 2013 Posted February 2, 2013 SCSU would NOT lose to any d3 team. That is absurd. Sioux rube seems to lack knowledge of the Women's game and the coaching staff. Oh yes they would me boy. Yes they would. Quote
undwhockey Posted February 2, 2013 Posted February 2, 2013 RIT won the D3 Championship last year. This year they moved to the CHA. TONIGHT they tied Lindenwod 1-1. I believe my point is proven. Quote
sioux rube Posted February 2, 2013 Posted February 2, 2013 RIT won the D3 Championship last year. This year they moved to the CHA. TONIGHT they tied Lindenwod 1-1. I believe my point is proven. Basing it on one game. Brilliant. Quote
undwhockey Posted February 2, 2013 Posted February 2, 2013 By comparison, St Cloud State won their 2 game series against Lindenwood 9-2. STC is in the middle of the pack for D1. Quote
sioux rube Posted February 2, 2013 Posted February 2, 2013 By comparison, St Cloud State won their 2 game series against Lindenwood 9-2. STC is in the middle of the pack for D1. Still stand by my statement. Thanks for participating. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.