Shawn-O Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 GT better hurry....the list of SWAC/MEAC/Pioneer tomato cans with an open date is a short one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmksioux Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 I wish Bison fans would realize that UND's schedule is full. All this speculation is coming from the Fargo media because NDSU needs a game, not UND. UND has seven home games and the schedule is looking great. Take your angst out on Dom Izzo and Kolpack for even bringing it up, To be fair, Faison was quoted as saying he would "entertain" the idea. Doesn't mean he would accept, but at least he is coming across as being open minded about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeAreNorthDakota Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 You really think that Mr. Faison wants this game next year with your schedule? I doubt your fb coach does. If it means the start of an every-other-year series with NDSU @ UND in 2015 I think he at least considers it. It may be worth taking one beating to get this thing going again. Unless we see a monumental defensive turnaround next year we're not going to the playoffs whether we play the game or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jodcon Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 You really think that Mr. Faison wants this game next year with your schedule? I doubt your fb coach does. While I think it would be great for both programs to get this started again even if it meant every other year, I can't see UND wanting to sandwich this OOC game between the 2 Montana's, it wouldn't be in their best interests trying to push for a playoff spot. If the schedule fell differently it would be a possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 To be fair, Faison was quoted as saying he would "entertain" the idea. Doesn't mean he would accept, but at least he is coming across as being open minded about it. He should've used the opportunity to advertise the highlights of UND's home schedule next year: http://wiki.siouxsports.com/doku.php/football/2013_schedule We should've been reading something like this: Faison said, "Our home schedule for next season is magnificent and our overall strength of schedule doesn't need improvement. I'll entertain thoughts of a game in Fargo on September 21 against NDSU, but I'm not sure I want the team traveling between our home games against Montana and Montana State, especially after having played South Dakota State before Montana." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fightingsioux4life Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 I think a couple agree with the article and we should play, and the rest don't...one guy said their rival is SDSU not UND. Um okay roll with that theory. Just like Minnesota's real hockey rival is Wisconsin. Yeah, right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmksioux Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 He should've used the opportunity to advertise the highlights of UND's home schedule next year: http://wiki.siouxspo...l/2013_schedule We should've been reading something like this: Faison said, "Our home schedule for next season is magnificent and our overall strength of schedule doesn't need improvement. I'll entertain thoughts of a game in Fargo on September 21 against NDSU, but I'm not sure I want the team traveling between our home games against Montana and Montana State, especially after having played South Dakota State before Montana." I was just looking at egriz a bit. One of their posters claims that Montana is still looking to opt out of their non-conference game against us next year if they can get a home game out of it. If this happens, I could see UND interested in a game against NDSU...not that it would change Taylor's opinion on the matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bincitysioux Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 If the Institute is really in a bad bind to get an eleventh game, I wouldn't be opposed to helping them out and allowing them to come to the Alerus so that they have a full schedule. It would be for the greater good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothmog Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 From the Fargo Forum: http://www.inforum.c.../group/Opinion/ My God, what a pile of steaming crap! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bincitysioux Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 My God, what a pile of steaming crap! If you mean Gene Taylor's conduct, I tend to agree............... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothmog Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 C'mon, the author admits that Taylor's reasons for not playing the game are legitimate, yet concludes that NDSU ought to ignore its own best interest and play the game anyway? Yeah sure, that makes perfect sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bincitysioux Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 I think it is in FU's best interest to play 11 games this season. C'mon up to Grand Forks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothmog Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 I think it is in FU's best interest to play 11 games this season. C'mon up to Grand Forks! First, UND doesn't want the game next year. Second NDSU will find an opponent anyway. I really have to wonder what's wrong with these "NDSU owes UND a game" people. Get a life! Move on...support YOUR team...enjoy the Big Sky...figure this DI thing out. Don't worry about NDSU - both schools are better off without the rivalry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnboyND7 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 First, UND doesn't want the game next year. Second NDSU will find an opponent anyway. I really have to wonder what's wrong with these "NDSU owes UND a game" people. Get a life! Move on...support YOUR team...enjoy the Big Sky...figure this DI thing out. Don't worry about NDSU - both schools are better off without the rivalry. I hope you aren't implying that it is one-sided. Plenty of 'SU folks would like to see it back as well. Wouldn't say both are better off without the rivalry. At this point, it would probably give UND's fanbase a big jolt though. By coming to their board and telling them to get a life seems odd. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothmog Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 I hope you aren't implying that it is one-sided. Plenty of 'SU folks would like to see it back as well. Wouldn't say both are better off without the rivalry. At this point, it would probably give UND's fanbase a big jolt though. By coming to their board and telling them to get a life seems odd. It is one-sided. Sure there are NDSU fans that want the game back, just not anywhere near as many. And where else am I going to tell them to get a life? Read the thread...this is the perfect place. Just to clarify "get a life" in this context means "stop limiting yourself, strive to be more than what you have been." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 First, UND doesn't want the game next year. Second NDSU will find an opponent anyway. I really have to wonder what's wrong with these "NDSU owes UND a game" people. Get a life! Move on...support YOUR team...enjoy the Big Sky...figure this DI thing out. Don't worry about NDSU - both schools are better off without the rivalry. UND doesn't need the game that is a fact. We have our 11 opponents all DI all count towards the playoffs. NDSU has 10 so they need that one FCS team to play (ideally in the Fargodome). So don't rip on UND for this, as this was started by Dom Izzo and the SU media. This seems to be a repetition until GT either plays 10 teams or schedules a DII team. Look how long it took to schedule Prairie View. So is this going to be an every year thing where they keep searching up to the last minute to fill out their schedule? Two years in a row says something. So that's why it makes GT look foolish to not renew the rivalry. Remember when Faison said 2015 Fargo 2017 Grand Forks, does GT still have the papers that was sen to him or did he use it for toilet paper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Did you do a survey to find out if there really is more UND fans than FU fans that want the game or are you just basing your opinion on what the 50 people who routinely post of bville think compared to the 50 people who routinely post here think? As Darrell mentioned above, this discussion was brought up by Fargo media yet I love how FU fans somehow spin it that its UND who needs this game. Play 10 games next year or pay someone $300,000 to come to Fargo. We really don't give a !@#$. Any team GT calls for the game holds all the negotiating power if their AD does their homework. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bincitysioux Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 First, UND doesn't want the game next year. Second NDSU will find an opponent anyway. I really have to wonder what's wrong with these "NDSU owes UND a game" people. Get a life! Move on...support YOUR team...enjoy the Big Sky...figure this DI thing out. Don't worry about NDSU - both schools are better off without the rivalry. Just having a little fun! I don't think FU owes North Dakota a game. In fact, I'd prefer to let the football game lie dead in the ditch. I just find it funny that the media is picking up on what I have been saying for years, which is that Taylor carries around in his front pocket a document with a long list of excuses of why the game won't work for him to reference any time the issue comes up. I've been saying it for years, the two teams won't play in football as long as Gene Taylor is employed by the Institute. That is fine by me. But like I said, for the greater good of the state, if Fargo still doesn't have 11 games come May or June, I'd be willing to let them come to Grand Forks so they have a full schedule.................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 It is one-sided. Sure there are NDSU fans that want the game back, just not anywhere near as many. And where else am I going to tell them to get a life? Read the thread...this is the perfect place. Just to clarify "get a life" in this context means "stop limiting yourself, strive to be more than what you have been." Once again, UND doesn't need a game. NDSU does. Get mad at your own media for starting this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Once again, UND doesn't need a game. NDSU does. Get mad at your own media for starting this. What I love on BVille is how they say UND is not on their level. Really? Are we still DII? I thought a win over us would count so why not play us if they think we are on the same level of a Robert Morris or Sioux Falls or Fargo South. But that's right we aren't the ones crying for a game it is the Fargo media. I guess Montana isn't on the same level as them since we beat them, and I say lets play them in the dome...we are 4-1 in their building. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
backpages Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 It is indeed a reversal of fortunes. UND has moved on. In the true Dakota spirit of Lewis and Clark their fortunes were westward. The timid remained east. Net net, UND is "America's Dakota University." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnboyND7 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 UND doesn't need the game that is a fact. We have our 11 opponents all DI all count towards the playoffs. NDSU has 10 so they need that one FCS team to play (ideally in the Fargodome). So don't rip on UND for this, as this was started by Dom Izzo and the SU media. This seems to be a repetition until GT either plays 10 teams or schedules a DII team. Look how long it took to schedule Prairie View. So is this going to be an every year thing where they keep searching up to the last minute to fill out their schedule? Two years in a row says something. So that's why it makes GT look foolish to not renew the rivalry. Remember when Faison said 2015 Fargo 2017 Grand Forks, does GT still have the papers that was sen to him or did he use it for toilet paper. I doubt it, can't help that Western Carolina is working on getting a situation that allows them to play two FBS games AND still have a shot of winning a Non-Conf game. It is indeed a reversal of fortunes. UND has moved on. In the true Dakota spirit of Lewis and Clark their fortunes were westward. The timid remained east. Net net, UND is "America's Dakota University." Lewis and Clark are not North Dakotan, hence nullifying your point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 I doubt it, can't help that Western Carolina is working on getting a situation that allows them to play two FBS games AND still have a shot of winning a Non-Conf game. Lewis and Clark are not North Dakotan, hence nullifying your point Backing out does suck (UND had Idaho St and Central Arkansas do this) but this is two years in a row of scheduling problems. GT is playing with fire and soon may be forced to pull an UNI and schedule a DII team for an 11th game or just play 10 and hope for a 10-0 record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMSioux Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 What I love on BVille is how they say UND is not on their level. Really? Are we still DII? I thought a win over us would count so why not play us if they think we are on the same level of a Robert Morris or Sioux Falls or Fargo South. But that's right we aren't the ones crying for a game it is the Fargo media. I guess Montana isn't on the same level as them since we beat them, and I say lets play them in the dome...we are 4-1 in their building. So what they are saying is Prairie View, St. Francis and whatever next years last minute choice is are at their level. Next we will start hearing that they reason they can't fill their schedule is everyone is afraid to play them. Our schedule is full and fine - the best Division 1 football schedule in the state, leave it alone. It's the media that is stirring this up. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 So what they are saying is Prairie View, St. Francis and whatever next years last minute choice is are at their level. Next we will start hearing that they reason they can't fill their schedule is everyone is afraid to play them. Our schedule is full and fine - the best Division 1 football schedule in the state, leave it alone. It's the media that is stirring this up. Correct. Somehow we are NOT at their level, but Wagner, St. Francis, Lafayette is. I am getting a feeling the NDSU fans think of themselves more and more like Alabama when reality tells them they are in the FCS like the other 100+ teams. UND, NDSU, USD, SDSU all DI playoff eligible, all at the same level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts